Five of fourteen models named Signifyd first on the direct prompt; zero named Forter. Both were named by all fourteen models and Signifyd carries 57 labels and Forter 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Signifyd and Forter were named in the same answer ninety-two times, of the 216 answers naming Signifyd and the 99 naming Forter. In those answers Forter took the first choice five times and Signifyd eighteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“reviews highlight issues with accuracy and billing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“far more accessible than enterprise-focused tools like Signifyd, Riskified, or Sift, which often target mid-market+ businesses and can cost thousands per month” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Guaranteed protection, zero liability for approved orders. | Higher fees per order; potential increase in false decline rates on borderline orders.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“One of the most widely adopted platforms, especially for mid-to-large merchants on Shopify, Magento, and BigCommerce.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Compare Signifyd or Riskified if your priority is covered chargeback exposure and automated order decisions.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best ecommerce fraud prevention platform for a mid-market B2B company is Signifyd.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Riskified, Forter, and Kount” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Premium pricing: Listed at $120K/year on AWS Marketplace for under 1M decisions—significantly more expensive than competitors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“if you need enterprise-grade protection with chargeback guarantees (though they're primarily enterprise-focused)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Tier 1 (Enterprise/High Touch): Forter, Signifyd. (High cost, full liability guarantee, heavy focus on human-in-the-loop workflows).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Riskified or Forter for high-volume retail, international sales, and aggressive false-decline reduction.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is widely considered the industry standard for high-volume transactions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.