Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Financial close manageme › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition
Financial close management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial close management software”, and as “month-end close software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
65%
Clear leader
65BlackLine08FloQast06OneStream21others
65% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−2Since October 2026: 67% → 65%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.BlackLine held the lead, −2 points on 67%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
FloQast28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: FloQast (28%) replaces Numeric (25% then, 19% now), 9 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast53%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 55% → 53%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
BlackLine65%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 67% → 65%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
FloQast28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: FloQast (28%) replaces Numeric (25% then, 19% now), 9 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast53%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 55% → 53%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBlackLine65%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 67% → 65%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01BlackLine65%12%73endorsed leader▼−2Since October 2026: 67% → 65%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.67% → 65%
BlackLine65%12%73endorsed leader▼−2Since October 2026: 67% → 65%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.67% → 65%02FloQast8%34%65criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 8%
FloQast8%34%65criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 8%03
OneStream6%11%53accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
OneStream6%11%53accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%04
Workiva4%6%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Workiva4%6%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%05
Numeric4%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Numeric4%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%06
Trintech2%6%33accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Trintech2%6%33accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
HighRadius2%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
HighRadius2%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
Prophix2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Prophix2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Vena0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Vena0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
Trintech Cadency0%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Trintech Cadency0%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
CCH Tagetik0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CCH Tagetik0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%8%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%8%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
FloQast vs PlanfulFloQast vs DatarailsFloQast vs BlackLineNumeric vs ProphixNumeric vs DOKKA CloseNumeric vs PlanfulNumeric vs DatarailsNumeric vs BlackLineProphix vs DOKKA CloseProphix vs PlanfulProphix vs DatarailsProphix vs BlackLineDOKKA Close vs PlanfulDOKKA Close vs DatarailsDOKKA Close vs BlackLinePlanful vs DatarailsPlanful vs BlackLineDatarails vs BlackLine
One product takes 65% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
FloQast34%
22 of 65 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Also quote-based and scales with "accounting team size." ... the percentage increase is often opaque.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
BlackLine12%
9 of 73 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“the following tools are generally not recommended because their pricing models are opaque” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
OneStream11%
6 of 53 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Uses a quote-based model driven by "entity and data volume." This is highly unpredictable” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Cube67%
4 of 6 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Cube, Datarails, and Vena are competent FP&A platforms, but their close functionality is secondary to planning and forecasting — they don’t replace a dedicated close engine.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 933 links across 231 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
38 answers · 58 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Bluecopa35 answers · 48 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Prophix33 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 57 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G230 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
vendor site · BlackLine19 answers · 35 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · DOKKA15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ChatFin14 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Trintech13 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Stacks13 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra13 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial close management software”, “close management tools”, “financial close management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackLine blackline.com | 65% | 249 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 | $4,066 | 79 | 9 |
| FloQast floqast.com | 8% | 389 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| OneStream onestream.com | 6% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 1 |
| Workiva workiva.com | 4% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | 4 |
| Numeric numeric.io | 4% | 201 | 12,100 | 38,006 | 94,254 | $426 | 9 | 3 |
| Trintech trintech.com Trintech 2%, Trintech Cadency 0% | 2% | 134 | 1,900 | 44 | 30,370 | 13 | ||
| HighRadius highradius.com | 2% | 604 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | 1 |
| Prophix prophix.com | 2% | 249 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 | |
| Double doublehq.com | 2% | 15 | 135,000 | 350,313 | 5,860 | 11 | ||
| Oracle oracle.com Oracle 2%, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 0% | 2% | 326 | 450,000 | 66,611 | 7,410,638 | $247 | 101 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blackline.com, g2.com). The first result for “best financial close management software” is bcsprosoft.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial close management software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which month-end close software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade close management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial close management software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial close management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which close management tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BlackLineBlackLineHeldBlackLine, OneStreamNumericagainst: FloQastno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, FloQast
Three alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
OneStream, Trintech CadencyThree alternatives
FloQast, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Trintech AdraTwo alternatives
BlackLine, OneStreamGPT-5.4 miniOracle Fusion Cloud EPM Financial Consolidation and CloseBlackLineChangedBlackLineBlackLineno first choicenothing named
One alternative
BlackLineThree alternatives
FloQast, SAP Advanced Financial Closing, WorkivaFive alternatives
FloQast, NetSuite Close Management and Consolidation, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Advanced Financial ClosingTwo alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Advanced Financial ClosingGemini 3.5 FlashBlackLineBlackLineHeldBlackLineTrintechBlackLineagainst: Cube, Datarails, FloQast, Oracle Financial Close Management, Planful, SAP Financial Closing Cockpit, Trintech Adra, Vena
Four alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Trintech, WorkivaThree alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, TrintechFive alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Trintech, WorkivaFour alternatives
BlackLine, FloQast, OneStream, Redwood Finance AutomationThree alternatives
FloQast, Trintech, WorkivaPerplexity SonarBlackLineBlackLineHeldagainst: FloQast, OneStream, WorkivaBlackLine, Trintech CadencyBlackLineagainst: Numericno first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, FloQast, Rillet, Vena
Six alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Cloud ERP, Simetrik, VenaOne alternative
Trintech CadencySix alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Redwood, WorkivaTwo alternatives
OneStream, Trintech CadencyGrok 4.20BlackLineagainst: FloQastBlackLineHeldBlackLineBlackLineagainst: FloQastno first choiceagainst: Asana, BlackLine, FloQast, Jira, Monday.com, SAP Cloud ERP, UiPath, Workiva
Five alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Financial Close Management, SAP Cloud ERP, Trintech, WorkivaThree alternatives
FloQast, Trintech, WorkivaFour alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Trintech, WorkivaOne alternative
OneStreamMistral SmallWorkivaBlackLineChangedBlackLineBlackLine, OneStreamno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, Trintech Cadency
Four alternatives
BlackLine, FloQast, OneStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
FloQast, TrintechSeven alternatives
Bluecopa, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, SAP Cloud ERP, Trintech, WorkivaDeepSeek V4 FlashBlackLineagainst: FloQastBlackLineHeldBlackLine, FloQastFloQastagainst: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Close, Trintech CadencyBlackLineagainst: Close.com, Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, FloQast, Trintech Adra, Trintech Cadency, Vena
Four alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, Trintech Cadency, WorkivaTwo alternatives
FloQast, Trintech CadencyThree alternatives
OneStream, Trintech, WorkivaFive alternatives
FloQast, Oracle, SAP, Trintech, WorkivaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceBlackLineChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Close.com CRM, FloQast
Three alternatives
FloQast, Rillet, TrintechQwen 3.7 FlashBlackLineBlackLineHeldBlackLineBlackLineagainst: Anaplan, Datalens / Double, FloQast, OneStreamno first choiceagainst: OccupEye, Sapience Analytics
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, FloQast, OneStream, WorkivaFour alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP S/4HANAFour alternatives
Concero, OneStream, Trullion, WorkivaKimi K2BlackLine, OneStreamagainst: FloQastBlackLineChangedagainst: OneStreamBlackLineWorkivaagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, Trintech CadencyFloQast, Numeric, Prophixagainst: Trintechagainst: Anaplan, BlackLine, FloQast, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, OneStream, Oracle, SAP, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
HighRadius, TrintechOne alternative
FloQastFive alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Trintech, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Cube, DoubleThree alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, OneStreamGLM 4.7 FlashXBlackLineBlackLine, HighRadiusChangedBlackLineOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Managementagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, OneStreamBlackLineagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, CloudHealth/Broadcom
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Trintech, WorkivaTwo alternatives
OneStream, WorkivaTen alternatives
CCH Tagetik, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Sage Intacct, Trintech Cadency, Vena, WorkivaOne alternative
VenaFive alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Prophix, TrintechMiniMax M2.5BlackLineagainst: FloQastBlackLineHeldBlackLineFloQastBlackLineagainst: FloQast, SAP Advanced Financial Closing
Three alternatives
OneStream, Trintech Cadency, WorkivaThree alternatives
Datarails, FloQast, OneStreamNine alternatives
Bluecopa, FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, Prophix Software, SAP S/4HANA, Trintech, WorkivaThree alternatives
BlackLine, OneStream, SAP Advanced Financial ClosingFour alternatives
Anaplan, FloQast, OneStream, TrullionGPT-6 LunaBlackLineBlackLineHeldno first choiceFloQastno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, Trintech Cadency
Three alternatives
FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMThree alternatives
FloQast, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Trintech CadencyEight alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Advanced Financial Closing, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
BlackLine, Trintech CadencyMuse Glimmer 30BBlackLine, OneStream, Oracleagainst: FloQastBlackLineChangedagainst: FloQastBlackLine, FloQastDoubleagainst: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Trintechno first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, FloQast, Vena
Four alternatives
HighRadius, Prophix, SAP Cloud ERP, WorkdayTwo alternatives
OneStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
OneStream, TrintechOne alternative
PivotXLBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 11 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 19 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:58 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 12 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 18 | 102 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 11 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 7 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:27 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 20 | 64 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 23 | 69 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 25 | 106 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 25 | 124 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 21 | 82 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 1 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:30 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:06 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 81 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 19 | 292 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:38 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 24 | 62 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 25 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 25 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adra read as Trintech Adra
Adra by Trintech read as Trintech Adra
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Close and Consolidation / FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix One read as Prophix
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Cost Explorer
Adra Suite
Akamai Bot Manager
AvePoint
Close.com CRM
CloudHealth/Broadcom
Cloudflare Bot Management
Concero
Datalens / Double
NetSuite Close Management and Consolidation
OccupEye
Oracle Financial Close
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM Financial Consolidation and Close
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM)
Redwood Finance Automation
Rencore
Sapience Analytics
Sixthfin
Studio360
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.