Crypto accounting for enterprise buyers
Asked as “crypto accounting platform”, and as “digital asset subledger”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
66%
Clear leader
66Bitwave18Cryptio06Breezing10others
66% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+9Since October 2026: 57% → 66%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Bitwave held the lead, +9 points on 57%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Breezing38%Contested▼−9Since October 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Bitwave33%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 27% → 33%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBitwave66%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 57% → 66%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
Breezing38%Contested▼−9Since October 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketBitwave33%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 27% → 33%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBitwave66%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 57% → 66%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Bitwave66%7%71endorsed leader▲+9Since October 2026: 57% → 66%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.57% → 66%
Bitwave66%7%71endorsed leader▲+9Since October 2026: 57% → 66%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.57% → 66%02
Cryptio18%6%65accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 14% → 18%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.14% → 18%
Cryptio18%6%65accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 14% → 18%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.14% → 18%03
SoftLedger4%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
SoftLedger4%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%04
Cryptoworth2%18%38accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Cryptoworth2%18%38accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%05
Lukka2%21%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Lukka2%21%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
CoinLedger0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CoinLedger0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Koinly0%83%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Koinly0%83%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
CoinTracker0%38%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
CoinTracker0%38%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Ledgible0%32%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Ledgible0%32%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
TaxBit0%32%19criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
TaxBit0%32%19criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%06
TRES Finance0%8%36accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
TRES Finance0%8%36accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Bitwave vs KoinlyBitwave vs SoftLedgerBitwave vs CoinLedgerCryptoworth vs BreezingCryptoworth vs CryptioCryptoworth vs KoinlyCryptoworth vs SoftLedgerCryptoworth vs CoinLedgerBreezing vs CryptioBreezing vs KoinlyBreezing vs SoftLedgerBreezing vs CoinLedgerCryptio vs KoinlyCryptio vs SoftLedgerCryptio vs CoinLedgerKoinly vs SoftLedgerKoinly vs CoinLedgerSoftLedger vs CoinLedger
One product takes 66% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Five products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Koinly83%
15 of 18 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid using as your primary enterprise sub-ledger: Platforms like Koinly, TokenTax, CoinLedger, and the consumer/individual versions of CoinTracker” Kimi K2, negative prompt
CoinLedger92%
12 of 13 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid using as your primary enterprise sub-ledger: Platforms like Koinly, TokenTax, CoinLedger, and the consumer/individual versions of CoinTracker” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Cryptoworth18%
7 of 38 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Appears better suited to growing or smaller-to-mid-sized finance teams than to the most demanding public-company environments.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
CoinTracker38%
6 of 16 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Optimized for personal investors; lacks enterprise controls, multi-entity support, and SOC certifications.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 957 links across 188 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Bitwave55 answers · 116 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Cryptoworth47 answers · 75 citations · 13 models
vendor site · CoinLedger47 answers · 50 citations · 13 models
vendor site · TRES36 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Spark26 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Breezing24 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Cryptio16 answers · 23 citations · 6 models
vendor site · CoinTracker11 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 13 models
28 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best crypto accounting platform”, “crypto accounting platform”, “crypto accounting platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitwave bitwave.io | 66% | 185 | 590 | 6 | 929 | 6 | 1 | |
| Cryptio cryptio.co | 18% | 169 | 201,000 | 1 | 187 | 6 | 2 | |
| Breezing breezing.io | 6% | 67 | 673,000 | 63,251 | 282 | 4 | ||
| SoftLedger softledger.com | 4% | 69 | 210 | 0 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 | |
| Cryptoworth cryptoworth.com | 2% | 130 | 320 | 1 | 1,335 | 0 | 6 | |
| Lukka lukka.tech | 2% | 41 | 880 | 49 | 425 | 3 | ||
| SAP Financial Products Subledger | 2% | |||||||
| TRES Finance tres.finance | 0% | 73 | 260 | 4 | 200 | 17 | 7 | |
| TaxBit taxbit.com | 0% | 26 | 1,300 | 17 | 4,748 | $5 | 27 | |
| Ledgible ledgible.io | 0% | 76 | 1,300 | 10 | 1,666 | 3 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 7 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bitwave.io, breezing.io, coinledger.io, cryptio.co, cryptoworth.com, g2.com, tres.finance). The first result for “best crypto accounting platform” is linkedin.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best crypto accounting platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which digital asset subledger would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade crypto accounting platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best crypto accounting platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a crypto accounting platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which crypto accounting platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BitwaveBitwaveHeldBitwave, CryptioBreezingagainst: BitwaveCryptioagainst: CoinLedger, Cryptoworth, Koinly, QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, Xero
Two alternatives
Cryptio, CryptoworthTwo alternatives
Cryptio, CryptoworthThree alternatives
Cryptoworth, Lukka, TRES FinanceOne alternative
MonocryptGPT-5.4 miniBitwaveagainst: KoinlySAP Financial Products SubledgerChangedBitwaveBitwaveagainst: Koinlyno first choiceagainst: CoinLedger, Ledgible, SoftLedger
One alternative
CryptioOne alternative
Universal LedgerTwo alternatives
Coinbase Business, TaxBitGemini 3.5 FlashBitwaveagainst: CoinTracker, KoinlyCryptioChangedBitwaveBitwaveno first choiceagainst: Breezing, CoinLedger, CoinTracker, Coinpanda, Koinly, ZenLedger
Four alternatives
Cryptio, Cryptoworth, Lukka, TRES FinanceTwo alternatives
Bitwave, LukkaFour alternatives
Cryptio, Lukka, TRES Finance, TaxBitTwo alternatives
Cryptio, SoftLedgerPerplexity SonarBitwaveBitwaveHeldBitwave, CryptioSoftLedgeragainst: Breezingno first choiceagainst: Cryptoworth, Ledgible, SoftLedger, TaxBit
Four alternatives
Cryptio, Ledgible, SoftLedger, TRES FinanceFour alternatives
Cryptio, Cryptoworth, Lukka, TRES FinanceSix alternatives
Cryptoworth, Ledgible, Lukka, SoftLedger, TRES Finance, TaxBitTwo alternatives
Bitwave, CryptioGrok 4.20Bitwaveagainst: CoinLedger, LukkaBitwaveHeldTRES Financeagainst: Ledgible, Lukka, SoftLedgerBitwaveagainst: LedgibleCryptioagainst: CoinLedger, CryptoTaxCalculator, Cryptoworth, Integral, Koinly, Lukka, TaxBit
Two alternatives
Cryptio, TRES FinanceTwo alternatives
Cryptio, CryptoworthTwo alternatives
Bitwave, CryptioTwo alternatives
Cryptio, CryptoworthThree alternatives
Bitwave, Cryptoworth, TRES FinanceMistral SmallBitwave, CryptioBitwaveChangedBitwaveBitwaveno first choiceagainst: CoinLedger, CoinTracking, Koinly
Two alternatives
CoinTracker, CryptioFour alternatives
Cryptio, Cryptoworth, Lukka, TRES FinanceTwo alternatives
Cryptio, TRES FinanceDeepSeek V4 FlashBitwaveBitwaveHeldLukkaCryptioagainst: Bitwave, Cryptoworth, LukkaCryptioagainst: CoinLedger, CoinTracker, Coinpanda, Cryptoworth, Integral, Koinly, ZenLedger
Two alternatives
Cryptio, TRES FinanceThree alternatives
Cryptio, Cryptoworth, TRES FinanceFour alternatives
Bitwave, Cryptio, TRES Finance, TaxBitOne alternative
TRES FinanceThree alternatives
Bitwave, Lukka, TRES FinanceLlama 4 MaverickBitwaveBitwaveHeldno first choiceBitwaveBitwave, Cryptionothing named
Two alternatives
Cryptio, CryptoworthThree alternatives
Cryptio, Cryptoworth, SoftLedgerOne alternative
SoftLedgerQwen 3.7 FlashCryptioBitwaveChangedCryptioSoftLedgeragainst: Bitwave, Cryptio, Ledgible, TRES Financeno first choiceagainst: Bitwave, CoinLedger, Cryptio, Cryptonator, Koinly, Summ, TokenMetrics Crypto Accounting
Four alternatives
Chainalysis Accounting, CoinTracker, Ledger Ledger, TaxBitTwo alternatives
CoinTracker, TRES FinanceFour alternatives
Bitwave, Cryptoworth, Ledgible, TRES FinanceKimi K2BitwaveBitwaveHeldCryptioBitwave, Cryptio, Lukkaagainst: Breezingno first choiceagainst: CoinLedger, CoinTracker, Koinly, TokenTax
One alternative
CryptioOne alternative
TRES FinanceFour alternatives
Bitwave, Cryptoworth, Lukka, TRES FinanceOne alternative
SoftLedgerGLM 4.7 FlashXBitwaveBitwaveHeldTRES Financeagainst: Integral, Lukkano first choiceno first choiceagainst: Breezing, CoinLedger, CoinTracker, CoinTracking.info, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, FreshBooks, Gilded, Koinly, Ledgible, Lukka, Lykke, TRES Finance
Five alternatives
CoinTracker, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, Ledgible, TaxBitOne alternative
CryptoworthFour alternatives
Bitwave, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, LedgibleMiniMax M2.5Bitwave, CryptoworthBitwaveChangedBitwaveBreezingagainst: CryptaCountno first choiceagainst: Crypto.com, Koinly
Two alternatives
Cryptio, SoftLedgerTwo alternatives
CoinTracker, CryptoworthFour alternatives
Cryptio, Lukka, TRES Finance, TaxBitThree alternatives
Bitwave, Cryptio, HeshiGPT-6 LunaBitwaveagainst: Fireblocks, TRES FinanceBitwaveHeldno first choiceagainst: Fireblocks Financial Data / TRESBitwaveagainst: CoinTrackingno first choiceagainst: CoinTracker, CoinTracking Corporate, Koinly, ZenLedger
One alternative
CryptioTwo alternatives
Cryptio, TRES Finance, now part of FireblocksSix alternatives
Bitwave, Cryptio, Ledgible, Lukka, SoftLedger, TaxBitOne alternative
CryptioMuse Glimmer 30BBitwaveagainst: CoinLedger, Koinly, TaxBitBitwaveHeldBitwave, Cryptioagainst: TaxBitBreezingagainst: Bitwave, Cryptio, Cryptoworth, TaxBitno first choiceagainst: Accointing, Blockpit, CoinLedger, CoinTracking, Koinly, Summ formerly CryptoTaxCalculator, TaxBit, ZenLedger
Two alternatives
Cryptio, CryptoworthOne alternative
CryptioTwo alternatives
CoinTracker, TRES FinanceOne alternative
SoftLedgerBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 12 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:32 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 21 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 22 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 5 | 127 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 17 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 24 | 297 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 23 | 52 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 6 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 16 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 22 | 83 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 24 | 78 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 21 | 84 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 23 | 136 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:14 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:31 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:57 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 15 | 64 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:06 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 17 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 7 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 24 | 81 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 21 | 116 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 23 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
TRES read as TRES Finance
TRES (Fireblocks) read as TRES Finance
Unresolved, counted raw
Chainalysis Accounting
CoinTracking Corporate
Cryptonator
Fireblocks Financial Data / TRES
KPMG Digital Asset Hub
Ledgebrook
Ledger Ledger
Lykke
Monocrypt
NYDIG Bridge
OpenEden
SAP Financial Products Subledger (FPSL)
Sablier
Silvergate
Summ formerly CryptoTaxCalculator
TRES Finance Fireblocks
TRES Finance, now part of Fireblocks
TokenMetrics Crypto Accounting
Universal Ledger
Xero‑Crypto
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.