Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Financial consolidation › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition
Financial consolidation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial consolidation software”, and as “multi-entity consolidation tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
67%
Clear leader
67OneStream12Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close08Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM12others
67% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+4Since October 2026: 63% → 67%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.OneStream held the lead, +4 points on 63%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Joiin50%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 46% → 50%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Prophix31%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 24% → 31%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
OneStream67%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 63% → 67%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
Joiin50%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 46% → 50%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketProphix31%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 24% → 31%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseOneStream67%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 63% → 67%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01OneStream67%3%60endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 63% → 67%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.63% → 67%
OneStream67%3%60endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 63% → 67%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.63% → 67%02
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close12%8%26accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 12%
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close12%8%26accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 12%03
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM8%6%35accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM8%6%35accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%04
CCH Tagetik4%10%42accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
CCH Tagetik4%10%42accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%05Prophix2%8%25accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Prophix2%8%25accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
SAP BPC0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP BPC0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Workday Adaptive Planning0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday Adaptive Planning0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10Anaplan Financial Consolidation0%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08
Planful0%12%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Planful0%12%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%06
SAP Group Reporting0%11%28accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
SAP Group Reporting0%11%28accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
BlackLine0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BlackLine0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Vena0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Vena0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Board0%0%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Board0%0%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Prophix vs VenaProphix vs OneStreamProphix vs Oracle NetSuiteProphix vs DatarailsJoiin vs PlanfulJoiin vs Sage IntacctJoiin vs VenaJoiin vs OneStreamJoiin vs Oracle NetSuiteJoiin vs DatarailsPlanful vs Sage IntacctPlanful vs VenaPlanful vs OneStreamPlanful vs Oracle NetSuitePlanful vs DatarailsSage Intacct vs VenaSage Intacct vs OneStreamSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs DatarailsVena vs OneStreamVena vs Oracle NetSuiteVena vs DatarailsOneStream vs Oracle NetSuiteOneStream vs DatarailsOracle NetSuite vs Datarails
One product takes 67% of first choices here, so the chart would put twelve markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP BPC38%
5 of 13 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“many large enterprises are planning structured migrations off SAP BPC/BFC/BOFC, Oracle HFM and similar legacy consolidation backbones” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“relying solely on spreadsheet models for consolidation at the enterprise level is widely considered a critical vulnerability” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
CCH Tagetik10%
4 of 42 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“subscription pricing can still vary by user count/features/customization, so it may be less ideal if "predictable cost" is the primary constraint” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
Anaplan Financial Consolidation
14%
3 of 21 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Anaplan and Oracle Cloud EPM are mentioned as tools that should be avoided or approached with caution” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 912 links across 274 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 26 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Prophix35 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OneStream23 answers · 48 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HighRadius16 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Simetrik15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Anaplan13 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Sourceforge13 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial consolidation software”, “consolidation tools”, “financial consolidation software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OneStream onestream.com | 67% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 2 |
| Oracle parent site Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close 12% | 12% | 36 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 8% | 8% | 326 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| CCH Tagetik wolterskluwer.com | 4% | 213 | 390 | 0 | 2,373,906 | $15,481 | 28 | 5 |
| Prophix prophix.com | 2% | 249 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 | |
| Workiva workiva.com | 2% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | |
| HighRadius highradius.com | 2% | 604 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | 2 |
| Quick Consols quickconsols.com | 2% | 4 | ||||||
| SAP S/4HANA Finance sap.com SAP Group Reporting 0%, SAP S/4HANA 0%, SAP 0%, SAP Analytics Cloud 0% | 0% | 160 | 135,000 | 74,309 | 2,214,514 company | $1,251 | 23 | |
| Board board.com | 0% | 147 | 90,500 | 612,482 | 44,405 | 106 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (anaplan.com, highradius.com, onestream.com). The first result for “best financial consolidation software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial consolidation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-entity consolidation tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade consolidation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial consolidation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial consolidation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which consolidation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5OneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Closeno first choiceChangedOneStreamOneStream, Prophixagainst: Joiinno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, Planful, VenaThree alternatives
Lucanet, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMOne alternative
BlackLineGPT-5.4 miniOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseOracle Financial Consolidation and Closeagainst: CCH Tagetikno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingFour alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Group Reporting, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Adaptive PlanningEight alternatives
BlackLine, Board, CCH Tagetik, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group Reporting, Vena, WorkivaThree alternatives
OneStream, SAP Financial Consolidation, SAP Group ReportingGemini 3.5 FlashOneStreamOneStreamHeldagainst: QuickBooks Online, Sage IntacctOneStreamOneStreamOneStreamagainst: Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Five alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP Group ReportingThree alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingFour alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingThree alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Cloud EPM: Financial Consolidation and CloseSix alternatives
Fluence Technologies, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group Reporting, VenaPerplexity SonarOneStreamOneStreamHeldagainst: Planful, ProphixOneStreamOracle Financial Consolidation and Closeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Group ReportingThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingSeven alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group Reporting, Vena, WorkivaTwo alternatives
OneStream, SAP Group ReportingGrok 4.20OneStreamOneStreamHeldCCH Tagetik, OneStreamOneStreamagainst: Planful, SAP Group Reporting, Workday Adaptive PlanningOneStream, Workivaagainst: Anaplan Financial Consolidationagainst: Cisco, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, SAP Group Reporting
Seven alternatives
BlackLine, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group Reporting, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMThree alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Planful, SAP Group ReportingMistral SmallCCH Tagetik, OneStreamno first choiceChangedOneStreamOneStreamno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Prophix, VenaSeven alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group Reporting, VenaTwo alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseDeepSeek V4 FlashOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamagainst: BlackLineOneStreamagainst: CCH Tagetik, Prophix, SAP S/4HANA FinanceOneStreamagainst: IBM Cognos Controller, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, SAP Financial Consolidation
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMFive alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC, SAP Group Reporting, WorkivaSeven alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, SAP, VenaOne alternative
Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseFive alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC, WorkivaLlama 4 MaverickOneStreamno first choiceChangedno first choiceOneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, SAP BPC
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, ProphixFour alternatives
Aleph, CCH Tagetik, DOKKA, ProphixQwen 3.7 FlashCCH Tagetik, OneStreamOneStreamChangedagainst: Oracle NetSuiteOneStreamno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperionagainst: Microsoft Excel, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, SAP BPC
Two alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC, SAP Group ReportingFour alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, PlanfulKimi K2OneStreamOneStreamHeldagainst: Cube, Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, VenaOneStreamagainst: Anaplan Financial ConsolidationOracle Financial Consolidation and Closeno first choiceagainst: Datarails, Jirav, Mosaic, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Group Reporting, Workday Adaptive Planningnothing named
Six alternatives
BlackLine, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Group Reporting, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Board, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, ProphixTwo alternatives
OneStream, VenaSix alternatives
Cube, Fluence Technologies, OneStream, Planful, Prophix, VenaGLM 4.7 FlashXOneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMOneStreamChangedAnaplan Financial ConsolidationHighRadiusagainst: CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel, Oracle, QuickBooks Online, SAP
Three alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, SAPThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, WorkivaThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANATwo alternatives
BrizoConsol, OneStreamMiniMax M2.5Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMOneStreamChangedCCH Tagetik, OneStreamOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: OneStream, SAP S/4HANA Financeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, SAPTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuiteSix alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, BlackLine, Board, FloQast, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics CloudGPT-6 LunaOneStreamOneStreamHeldBoard, OneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseOracle Financial Consolidation and Closeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Group Reporting, Workday Financial Close & ConsolidationTwo alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Group ReportingFour alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, CCH Tagetik, SAP Group Reporting, Workday Close and ConsolidationOne alternative
OneStreamMuse Glimmer 30BOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamQuick Consolsagainst: CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Cloud EPM FCCS, Planfulno first choiceagainst: Cartesis, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, SAP BPC
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingSeven alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group ReportingTwo alternatives
BrizoConsol, RephopBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 20 | 53 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 14 | 81 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:59 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 72 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 13 | 82 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 15 | 45 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 21 | 110 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 24 | 99 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 3 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:25 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:20 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 5 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 15 | 83 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:46 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 14 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 25 | 129 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Anaplan read as Anaplan Financial Consolidation
Anaplan (Financial Consolidation and Reporting - FCR) read as Anaplan Financial Consolidation
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Fluence read as Fluence Technologies
Host Analytics read as Planful
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation & Close / FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation and Close - FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation and Close) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud Financial Consolidation and Close (FCC) read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Oracle Cloud Financial Consolidation and Close (FCCS) read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud (Financial Consolidation and Close - FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle FCCS read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Oracle FCCS (Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud) read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Prophix One read as Prophix
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Advanced read as QuickBooks Online
SAP Group Reporting read as SAP Group Reporting
SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting read as SAP Group Reporting
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik) read as CCH Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Boomi Data Hub
Cisco
CrowdStrike
IBM InfoSphere DataStage
Informatica IDMC
Microsoft SSIS / Azure Data Factory
Oracle Cloud EPM FCCS
Oracle Cloud EPM: Financial Consolidation and Close (FCCS)
Palo Alto Networks
Talentia
Talentia Software
Workday Close and Consolidation
Workday Consolidation
Workday Financial Close & Consolidation
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.