November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Financial close manageme › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Financial close management for small business buyers

Asked as “financial close management software”, and as “month-end close software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · Numeric 19%
28FloQast19Numeric12QuickBooks Online40others

28% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: FloQast (28%) replaces Numeric (25% then, 19% now), 9 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.FloQast leads at 28%, replacing Numeric, which led at 25% and stands at 19% now: 9 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01FloQast28%29%63criticized challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 19% → 28%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.19% → 28%
02Numeric19%2%47accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 25% → 19%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.25% → 19%
03QuickBooks Online12%0%19accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 12%
04Datarails9%0%33accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 9%
05Xero7%11%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 7%
06DOKKA Close5%10%31accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12BlackLine0%78%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Workiva0%64%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Prophix0%15%13accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
08Vena0%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Lucanet0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Sage Intacct0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01FloQast28%
02Numeric19%
03QuickBooks Online12%
04Datarails9%
05Xero7%
06DOKKA Close5%
07Sage Intacct0%
08Vena0%
09Prophix0%
10Lucanet0%
11Workiva0%
12BlackLine0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BlackLine
78%
28 of 36 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“Why avoid: High annual contracts (frequently $20,000–$50,000+ per year), steep learning curves... vastly over-engineered for small accounting teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
FloQast
29%
18 of 63 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“BlackLine and FloQast are the most prominent examples of tools designed primarily for enterprise-level organizations” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Trintech
56%
5 of 9 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise solutions like BlackLine or Trintech ... they're overkill and overpriced” Kimi K2, direct prompt
OneStream
86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise EPM/Close suites like BlackLine, Workiva, OneStream, or Trintech Cadency.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 843 links across 217 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · DOKKA44 answers · 62 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra33 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Prophix27 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Netgain26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Numeric17 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GetApp13 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Sourceforge12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · PivotXL11 answers · 14 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial close management software”, “close management tools”, “financial close management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
FloQast floqast.com28%3899,90019441,324$5,03976
Numeric numeric.io19%20112,10038,00694,254$42693
QuickBooks quickbooks.ninja
QuickBooks Online 12%
12%6921,000,00054,681253 company
Datarails datarails.com9%3746,60013418,964$16,697107
Xero xero.com7%72990,5004,6101,200,289$500119
DOKKA dokka.com
DOKKA Close 5%
5%469,606 company17
ScaleXP scalexp.com4%32
PivotXL pivotxl.com4%287009,1140
CloseCore closecore.com
CloseCore 2%, CloseCore Close Management 2%
4%7
Double doublehq.com2%15135,000350,3135,86011

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, numeric.io). The first result for “best financial close management software” is bcsprosoft.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best financial close management software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which month-end close software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top close management tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial close management software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a financial close management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which close management tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5FloQast
Three alternativesCube, DOKKA Close, Datarails
Easy Month EndChanged
Three alternativesFloQast, Numeric, ScaleXP
FloQast
Four alternativesDOKKA Close, Datarails, Double, Numeric
Numeric
Five alternativesDatarails, Double, Novacly, Planful, QuickBooks Online
no first choiceagainst: BlackLine, Redwood
GPT-5.4 miniFloQast
Three alternativesDatarails, Joiin, LiveFlow
FloQastHeld
Four alternativesBlackLine, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho Books
no first choiceJoiin
One alternativeCloseCore
against: FloQast
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashFloQast, Numeric
Three alternativesCube, Datarails, Keeper
against: BlackLine, OneStream, Trintech Cadency, Workiva
NumericChanged
Three alternativesFloQast, Keeper, ScaleXP
against: BlackLine, Workiva
Numeric
Four alternativesFloQast, Keeper, Netgain, ScaleXP
against: BlackLine, Trintech Cadency
ScaleXP
Five alternativesCoefficient, Double, LiveFlow, Numeric, Xenett
against: BlackLine, FloQast
no first choice
Two alternativesFloQast, Numeric
against: BlackLine, Workiva
against: Anaplan, Asana, BlackLine, ClickUp, FloQast, Monday.com, OneStream, Oracle Cloud FCCS, Planful, SAP Financial Close, Trello, Trintech, Vena, Workiva
Perplexity SonarNumeric
One alternativeFloQast
against: BlackLine, OneStream, Planful
QuickBooks Online, XeroChanged
Four alternativesDouble, Financial Cents, Numeric, ScaleXP
against: FloQast
Close, Pipedrive
Two alternativesHubSpot, Salesflare
against: Asana, Trello
Numeric
Three alternativesDOKKA Close, Datarails, Excel or Google Sheets
against: BlackLine, FloQast, Lucanet, OneStream, Planful
no first choiceagainst: BlackLine, Excel, FloQast, Numeric, Trintech Cadency
Grok 4.20Datarails, FloQast
Three alternativesQuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, Xero
against: Trintech, Workiva
DatarailsChanged
Four alternativesDOKKA Close, FloQast, Numeric, PivotXL
FloQast, Numeric
Three alternativesDOKKA Close, Datarails, Vena
against: BlackLine, Trintech Cadency, Workiva
QuickBooks Online
Two alternativesSage Intacct, Xero
against: BlackLine, FloQast, Workiva
no first choiceagainst: Oracle, SAPagainst: BlackLine, Close, Excel/Google Sheets, FloQast, Oracle Close Management, Salesforce, Workiva, Zoho CRM
Mistral SmallFloQast
One alternativeDigits
DOKKA Close, FloQastChanged
Two alternativesNumeric, QuickBooks Online
DOKKA Close
Five alternativesDatarails, FloQast, Numeric, Prophix, Vena
DOKKA Close, FloQast
Three alternativesDatarails, Numeric, Vena
no first choiceagainst: BlackLine, Close.com, Workiva
DeepSeek V4 FlashDatarails
Four alternativesDOKKA Close, FloQast, Numeric, Sage Intacct
against: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Planful, Trintech
QuickBooks OnlineChanged
Two alternativesXero, Zoho Books
against: DOKKA Close, FloQast
DOKKA Close, FloQast
Three alternativesDatarails, Sage Intacct, Vena
PivotXL
One alternativeDouble
against: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, FloQast, OneStream
FloQast
Three alternativesDatarails, Numeric, Sage Intacct
against: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik
against: HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics 365 CRM, Oracle NetSuite CRM, Salesforce, SugarCRM
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceNumericChanged
Two alternativesBlackLine, QuickBooks Online
against: Xero
FloQast
One alternativeTrintech
FloQast
Two alternativesPlanful, Prophix
no first choiceagainst: Close
Qwen 3.7 FlashFloQast
Five alternativesCorrode, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, Sage Intacct, Xero
QuickBooks OnlineChanged
Three alternativesDOKKA Close, FloQast, LiveFlow
against: Xero
no first choiceCloseCore, Numeric
Five alternativesAsana, Monday.com, Oracle NetSuite, PivotXL, Sage Intacct
against: BlackLine, FloQast
FloQast
Three alternativesApproach, ClosePeriod, Vena
against: BlackLine, Trintech
against: Jira, Microsoft Project, Oracle NetSuite, SAP, Shopify, Slack
Kimi K2FloQast, Numeric
Two alternativesDatarails, Double
against: BlackLine, Trintech
QuickBooks Online, XeroChanged
Four alternativesDOKKA Close, FloQast, Numeric, Zoho Books
FloQast, Numeric
Two alternativesDOKKA Close, Digits Core
against: BlackLine
QuickBooks Online, Xero
Three alternativesDOKKA Close, Double, Numeric
against: FloQast
FloQast
One alternativeBlackLine
against: BlackLine, FloQast, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, SAP BPC, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXFloQast
Three alternativesDataSnipper, QuickBooks Online, Xero
against: DOKKA Close
ScaleXPChanged
Two alternativesFinlens, Numeric
against: FloQast
no first choiceDigits, Financial Cents Month-End Close
Two alternativesFloQast, Numeric
against: Novacly
no first choiceagainst: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle ERP Cloud, Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, SAP
MiniMax M2.5FloQast
Four alternativesDOKKA Close, DataSnipper, Numeric, Sage Intacct
DOKKA CloseChanged
Three alternativesDatarails, Digits Core, Numeric
DOKKA Close, FloQast, Numeric
Two alternativesDatarails, Digits
Datarails, PivotXL
Two alternativesDOKKA Close, DataSnipper
Datarails
Three alternativesNetClose, Planful, Sage Intacct
against: BlackLine, FloQast
GPT-6 LunaNumeric
Two alternativesCloseCore, FloQast
NumericHeldNumeric
Three alternativesFloQast, NetClose, Trintech Adra
against: BlackLine
CloseCore Close Management
One alternativeDigits
no first choice
Three alternativesFloQast, Netgain NetClose, Numeric
against: BlackLine
against: BlackLine, FloQast, Trintech Cadency
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice
Seven alternativesDOKKA Close, Datarails, FloQast, Numeric, PivotXL, Prophix, Vena
Numeric, QuickBooks Online, XeroChanged
Two alternativesDatarails, FloQast
no first choice
Three alternativesFinlens, Prophix, Vena
against: BlackLine, FloQast
Double
Two alternativesDatarails, PivotXL
against: DOKKA Close, FloQast, Wave
no first choiceagainst: Close, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Salesforce, Zoho
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:43yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:54yes15 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:44yes817 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:17yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:30yes2133 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:55yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:20yes2524 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:01yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:41no029 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:39yes1122 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:43yes1829 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:41yes1185 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:36yes318 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:59yes1120 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:26yes107 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:23yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:35yes620 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:46yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:23yes527 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:07yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:35yes2331 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:14yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:00yes1562 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:53yes1016 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:43yes1856 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:06yes531 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:27yes213 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:50yes1319 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:31yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:24yes05 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:37yes922 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:27yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes1034 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:20yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:56yes2536 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:55yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:13yes536 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:39yes1439 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:19yes957 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:37yes2258 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:40yes520 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:52yes1529 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:34yes179 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:59yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:17yes1322 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:05yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:05yes531 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:08yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:18yes2418 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:16yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:19yes1028 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:41yes1724 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:53yes2121 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:34yes520 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:45yes214 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:11yes1932 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:20no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:50no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:22no014 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:27yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes531 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:47no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:42yes1737 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:18yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:14no027 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:24yes1455 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:53yes14119 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:46yes1039 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:17yes420 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:43yes1018 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:25yes98 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:01yes35 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:20yes1122 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:32yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:30yes1836 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:31yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:00yes2332 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:13yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:47yes1031 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:57yes2430 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:59yes1955 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:01yes2458 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:43yes218 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:44yes2431 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adra by Trintech read as Trintech Adra
DOKKA read as DOKKA Close
HubSpot CRM read as HubSpot
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Oracle) read as Oracle NetSuite
Prophix One read as Prophix
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
Salesforce Sales Cloud read as Salesforce
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Unresolved, counted raw
Approach
Avalara Rev Rec
ClosePeriod
Corrode
Financial Cents Month-End Close
Less Annoying CRM
Microsoft Dynamics 365 CRM
Netgain NetClose
Oracle Close Management
Oracle Cloud FCCS
Oracle NetSuite CRM
SugarCRM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← ERP systemsFinancial consolidation →