Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Account reconciliation › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition
Account reconciliation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “account reconciliation software”, and as “bank reconciliation automation”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
63%
Clear leader
63BlackLine Transaction Matching06HighRadius06Trintech25others
63% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
FloQast vs Zoho BooksFloQast vs HighRadiusFloQast vs XeroFloQast vs Prophix OneNumeric vs Trintech AdraNumeric vs QuickBooks OnlineNumeric vs Zoho BooksNumeric vs HighRadiusNumeric vs XeroNumeric vs Prophix OneTrintech Adra vs QuickBooks OnlineTrintech Adra vs Zoho BooksTrintech Adra vs HighRadiusTrintech Adra vs XeroTrintech Adra vs Prophix OneQuickBooks Online vs Zoho BooksQuickBooks Online vs HighRadiusQuickBooks Online vs XeroQuickBooks Online vs Prophix OneZoho Books vs HighRadiusZoho Books vs XeroZoho Books vs Prophix OneHighRadius vs XeroHighRadius vs Prophix OneXero vs Prophix One
One product takes 63% of first choices here, so the chart would put seven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Six of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BlackLine Transaction Matching14%
8 of 59 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid these if you have thousands of users ... No published rates—you're at the mercy of sales negotiations.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Using spreadsheets like Microsoft Excel for reconciliation poses significant risks, including errors, inefficiencies, and potential regulatory and audit issues” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
FloQast24%
6 of 25 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Mid-market platforms like DOKKA, Numeric, and FloQast ... not as the best fit for large regulated enterprises” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Trintech Adra50%
4 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“mid-market sub-products like Trintech’s *Adra*—which Trintech itself positions below its enterprise suite, *Cadency*” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1001 links across 207 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · HighRadius41 answers · 65 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Numeric41 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Bluecopa36 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Airwallex30 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Maxima26 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ramp25 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Trintech24 answers · 41 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Prophix23 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics21 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Reconciler21 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “account reconciliation software”, “best account reconciliation software”, “reconciliation tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackLine blackline.com BlackLine Transaction Matching 63% | 63% | 147 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 company | $4,066 | 79 | 2 |
| Trintech trintech.com Trintech 6%, Trintech Cadency 6%, Trintech Adra 2% | 14% | 134 | 1,900 | 44 | 30,370 | 13 | 2 | |
| HighRadius highradius.com | 6% | 604 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | 1 |
| FloQast floqast.com | 4% | 389 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud 4%, Oracle NetSuite 0% | 4% | 542 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 4% | 4% | 326 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| OneStream onestream.com | 2% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 5 |
| Xero xero.com | 2% | 729 | 90,500 | 4,610 | 1,200,289 | $500 | 119 | |
| insightsoftware JustPerform | 2% | |||||||
| ReconArt reconart.com | 0% | 47 | 110 | 0 | 384 | 17 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bluecopa.com, gartner.com, highradius.com, numeric.io, ramp.com, trintech.com). The first result for “account reconciliation software” is highradius.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best account reconciliation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which bank reconciliation automation would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade reconciliation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best account reconciliation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an account reconciliation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reconciliation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechXeroagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech Cadencyno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Two alternatives
OneStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
HighRadius, Trintech CadencyThree alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Sage IntacctOne alternative
Oracle Account Reconciliation CloudGPT-5.4 miniBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadiusChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: CCH Tagetik, Trintech Adrano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
FloQast, TrintechSeven alternatives
CCH Tagetik, HighRadius, Lucanet, OneStream, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, SAP Financial Close, TrintechOne alternative
Trintech CadencyGemini 3.5 FlashBlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechBlackLine Transaction MatchingChangedBlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechTrintech Cadencyagainst: BlackLine Transaction MatchingFloQast, Trintech Adraagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech Cadencyagainst: FloQast, Numeric, QuickBooks/Xero add-ons, Trintech Adra
Three alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, LedgeThree alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, TrintechFour alternatives
Duco, FloQast, ReconArt, SmartStreamOne alternative
ReconArtThree alternatives
HighRadius, Maxima, NumericPerplexity SonarBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choiceagainst: DOKKA, FloQast, Numeric
Three alternatives
Numeric, OneStream, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
ReconArt, TrintechFive alternatives
AutoRek, HighRadius, OneStream, SmartStream, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Trintech CadencyGrok 4.20BlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction MatchingOracle Account Reconciliation Cloudagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, ReconArt, Trintech Adra, Trintech CadencyBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, Microsoft Excel, Trintech Adra, Workiva
Three alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, TrintechThree alternatives
HighRadius, ReconArt, TrintechSix alternatives
AutoRek, FloQast, OneStream, ReconArt, SmartStream, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
OneStream, Trintech CadencyMistral SmallBlackLine Transaction MatchingHighRadiusChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, ReconArtTwo alternatives
BlackLine Transaction Matching, NomentiaSeven alternatives
AutoRek, HighRadius, OneStream, Osfin, SmartStream, SolveXia, TrintechOne alternative
Trintech CadencyDeepSeek V4 FlashBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: FloQastBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldagainst: AutoRek, FloQast, SmartStreamBlackLine Transaction Matchinginsightsoftware JustPerformagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadius, TrintechBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: Spreadsheets
Two alternatives
HighRadius, TrintechThree alternatives
HighRadius, ReconArt, Trintech CadencyFive alternatives
Aico, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, ReconcilerFour alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Numeric, Trintech CadencyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceBlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQastChangedno first choiceBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech CadencyBlackLine Transaction Matching, OneStream, Trintechnothing named
Three alternatives
HighRadius, Nomentia, Vic.aiOne alternative
NumericQwen 3.7 FlashBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction Matchingagainst: FloQastBlackLine Transaction Matchingno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
Copper Mountain Systems, Fathom, VenaTwo alternatives
HighRadius, Trintech CadencyFour alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, SmartStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
OneStream, SAP Analytics CloudKimi K2BlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechBlackLine Transaction MatchingChangedBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction Matching, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech Cadencyagainst: Microsoft Excel
Two alternatives
FloQast, WorkivaThree alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle NetSuite, Trintech CadencyFive alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, ReconArt, TrintechTwo alternatives
OneStream, Trintech CadencyOne alternative
FloQastGLM 4.7 FlashXBlackLine Transaction MatchingBlackLine Transaction MatchingHeldBlackLine Transaction Matching, TrintechOracle Account Reconciliation Cloudagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadiusno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Five alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix One, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
HighRadius, TrintechEight alternatives
AutoRek, Bluecopa, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Prophix One, SmartStream, SolveXiaOne alternative
NumericMiniMax M2.5BlackLine Transaction Matching, HighRadiusBlackLine Transaction MatchingChangedBlackLine Transaction Matching, Trintech CadencyOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: BlackLine Transaction Matching, FloQast, Trintechno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, SAP ReconciliationThree alternatives
Bluecopa, HighRadius, SAP FIMSeven alternatives
AutoRek, FloQast, HighRadius, Osfin, SmartStream, SolveXia, Trintech AdraFour alternatives
HighRadius, Nanonets, Numeric, insightsoftwareBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:13 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:33 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:54 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:30 | yes | 30 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:49 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:47 | yes | 18 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:37 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:05 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:40 | yes | 8 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:17 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:46 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:57 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 27 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:06 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:39 | yes | 11 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:17 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:01 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 27 | 75 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:10 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:20 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:44 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:46 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:20 | yes | 32 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:45 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:39 | yes | 29 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:43 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:55 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:21 | yes | 17 | 56 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:12 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:56 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:40 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:38 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:09 | yes | 38 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:51 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:20 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:41 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:09 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:11 | yes | 25 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:48 | yes | 17 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:17 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:36 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:13 | yes | 7 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:53 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:59 | yes | 12 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:08 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:12 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:42 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:37 | yes | 27 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 12 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:10 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:56 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:53 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:57 | yes | 16 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:25 | yes | 40 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:40 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:12 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:58 | yes | 27 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:37 | yes | 23 | 81 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:09 | yes | 17 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adra read as Trintech Adra
Adra (Trintech) read as Trintech Adra
BlackLine read as BlackLine Transaction Matching
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Hevo read as Hevo Data
Maxima AI read as Maxima
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud Service (ARCS) read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Account Reconciliation) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix read as Prophix One
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Unresolved, counted raw
Blue Ridge
Copper Mountain Systems
Gresham
Oracle or OneStream
Rexi
SAP FIM
insightsoftware JustPerform
reconcile.one
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.