September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › Finance › Accounting and close › ERP systems › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

ERP systems for enterprise buyers

Asked as “ERP system”, and as “enterprise resource planning software for finance”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
48%
Clear leader
48SAP S/4HANA20Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP14Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance18others

48% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01SAP S/4HANA48%18%62endorsed leader
02Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP20%13%53accepted challenger
03Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance14%0%31accepted challenger
04Workday Financial Management6%5%38accepted challenger
05Microsoft Dynamics 3656%5%21accepted challenger
06Acumatica4%29%14criticized challenger
07Oracle NetSuite2%39%31criticized challenger
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Epicor Kinetic0%20%10accepted challenger
08Infor CloudSuite0%19%27accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
M05
06
07
08
09
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01SAP S/4HANA48%
02Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP20%
03Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance14%
04Workday Financial Management6%
05Microsoft Dynamics 3656%
06Acumatica4%
07Oracle NetSuite2%
08Infor CloudSuite0%
09Epicor Kinetic0%

What they warned about

One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Oracle NetSuite
39%
12 of 31 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Systems to Approach with High Caution or Avoid for Large Enterprises: Midmarket-Focused ERPs (e.g., NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central)” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
SAP S/4HANA
18%
11 of 62 labels negative · 9 of 12 models
“ERP systems that large enterprises should be cautious about or avoid. Some of the ERP systems mentioned include SAP S/4HANA, Oracle ERP Cloud, and Microsoft Dynamics 365.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
13%
7 of 53 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“Some of the ERP systems mentioned include SAP S/4HANA, Oracle ERP Cloud, and Microsoft Dynamics 365.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
SAP ECC
100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“SAP ECC, for example, faces a mainstream maintenance end-date of 2027 ... Buying into or remaining on these systems is highly risky” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 900 links across 295 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

50 answers · 162 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Zapier16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · NetSuite15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Spendesk15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
10 answers · 14 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best erp system”, “erp system”, “erp systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
SAP S/4HANA sap.com48%1603762,214,514$1,251232
Oracle Fusion oracle.com
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP 20%, Oracle 0%
20%121450,00066,6117,410,638 company$2471011
Microsoft Dynamics microsoft.com
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance 14%
14%10839021145,358,109 company$12,455103
Workday parent site
Workday Financial Management 6%
6%1101,220,00023,848
Microsoft Dynamics 3656%12,100604
Acumatica acumatica.com4%14212,100242130,487$2,934120
Oracle parent site
Oracle NetSuite 2%, Oracle PeopleSoft 0%
2%542450,00066,611
Infor M3 infor.com
Infor CloudSuite 0%, Infor M3 0%
0%541,60068313,194$15,42848
IFS Cloud ifs.com0%285902469,014$41738
Epicor Kinetic epicor.com0%411,3003949,61675

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forbes.com, reddit.com). The first result for “best erp system” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best ERP system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which enterprise resource planning software for finance would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade ERP systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ERP system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a ERP system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ERP systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceSAP S/4HANAChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
no first choiceMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
One alternativeOdoo
against: SAP S/4HANA
no first choiceagainst: Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA
GPT-5.4 miniSAP S/4HANA
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
against: Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial Management
no first choiceSAP S/4HANA
One alternativeMicrosoft Dynamics 365
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashSAP S/4HANA
Five alternativesAcumatica, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite
SAP S/4HANAHeld
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial Management
against: Oracle NetSuite
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Three alternativesIFS Cloud, Infor CloudSuite, Workday Financial Management
Acumatica
Five alternativesERPNext, IFS Cloud, Odoo, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Workday Financial Management
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
against: Oracle NetSuite
against: Acumatica, ERPNext, Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Odoo, Oracle JD Edwards, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle PeopleSoft, QuickBooks, SAP ECC, Sage 50, Sage Intacct, Zoho One
Perplexity SonarSAP S/4HANA
Four alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAChanged
One alternativeWorkday Financial Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternativesInfor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial Management
Acumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Financeagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks, SAP Business One, Sage Intacct, Workday Financial Management
Grok 4.20Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial Management
SAP S/4HANAChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial Management
SAP S/4HANA
Five alternativesInfor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial Management
against: Odoo
SAP S/4HANA
One alternativeMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance
against: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
no first choiceagainst: Infor M3, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle JD Edwards, Oracle NetSuite, SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA
Mistral SmallSAP S/4HANA
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Workday Financial Management
no first choiceSAP S/4HANA
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial Management
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashSAP S/4HANA
Four alternativesEpicor Kinetic, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternativesIFS Cloud, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Workday Financial Management
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Two alternativesOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
no first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Infor Legacy On-Premise, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA, Sage, Sage X3
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceMicrosoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementChangedno first choiceSAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Qwen 3.7 FlashOracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA
Two alternativesInfor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, SAP S/4HANAChanged
Two alternativesOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial Management
SAP S/4HANA
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial Management
against: Oracle NetSuite
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Four alternativesAcumatica, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial Management
no first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Nav Business, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Sage Intacct, Workday Financial Management
Kimi K2SAP S/4HANA
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Workday Financial ManagementChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
SAP S/4HANA
Four alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial Management
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, SAP S/4HANA
One alternativeOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
no first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Odoo, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Business One, SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA, Sage
GLM 4.7 FlashXSAP S/4HANA
Three alternativesInfor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAChanged
Three alternativesIFS Cloud, Infor CloudSuite, Workday Financial Management
no first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
One alternativeMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance
no first choiceagainst: Infor CloudSuite, MACH, Oracle NetSuite, SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
One alternativeSAP S/4HANA
SAP S/4HANAChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial Management
SAP S/4HANA
Three alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial Management
Microsoft Dynamics 365
One alternativeOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
against: SAP S/4HANA
no first choiceagainst: Infor CloudSuite, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 19:21no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 20:25yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 18:18yes722 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 20:50yes207 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 18:39yes3616 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 18:29yes98 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 20:02yes1013 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 20:33yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 20:27no021 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 20:00yes1035 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 20:24no012 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 20:12yes1023 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 19:46no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 19:47yes59 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 19:23yes922 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 20:24yes208 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 18:24yes3115 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 20:55yes56 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 18:30yes1015 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 20:43yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 20:09no025 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 20:17yes1546 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 19:55yes942 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 18:49yes1327 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 18:10yes97 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 18:20yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 21:53yes2248 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 18:07yes1511 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 19:11yes1311 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 20:11yes1020 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 20:52yes1920 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 18:16yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 19:51yes535 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 20:43yes1030 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 20:02yes1593 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 18:03yes529 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 19:32yes1810 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 18:27yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 19:25yes2431 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 18:20yes2010 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 21:03yes4122 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 19:39yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 20:40yes2733 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 19:29yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 19:41yes1044 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 19:53yes2027 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 21:00yes22105 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 18:55yes1464 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 19:45yes2816 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 20:28no011 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 21:56no056 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 19:16yes1510 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 19:03yes1313 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 18:35no013 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-09-17 17:56yes2771 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 18:15yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 19:01no030 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 20:19yes2442 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 19:45yes25181 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 19:47yes522 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 18:35yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 19:02no07 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 18:26yes1724 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 17:53yes209 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 18:39yes1916 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 20:45yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 20:53yes2848 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 20:38yes84 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 18:37yes1051 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 19:50yes2545 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 21:10yes14116 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 17:59yes2051 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica Cloud ERP read as Acumatica
Dynamics 365 Business Central read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (F&O) read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Epicor read as Epicor Kinetic
Infor read as Infor CloudSuite
Infor (CloudSuite) read as Infor CloudSuite
Infor (like LN or M3) read as Infor CloudSuite
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Oracle) read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud ERP read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Cloud ERP (Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Cloud ERP (Oracle Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud (Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud (or Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
SAP read as SAP S/4HANA
Workday read as Workday Financial Management
Workday Enterprise Management Cloud read as Workday Financial Management
Workday Financials read as Workday Financial Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Infor Distribution
Infor Legacy On-Premise (LN, Baan, XA, SX.e, LX)
Infor M3
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Crypto accountingFinancial close manageme →