Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Financial consolidation › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition
Financial consolidation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial consolidation software”, and as “multi-entity consolidation tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 37 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
78%
OneStreamClear leader
78OneStream08Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM03Board11others
78% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Prophix vs Oracle NetSuiteProphix vs VenaProphix vs FathomProphix vs BlackLineJoiin vs Sage IntacctJoiin vs PlanfulJoiin vs Oracle NetSuiteJoiin vs VenaJoiin vs FathomJoiin vs BlackLineSage Intacct vs PlanfulSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs VenaSage Intacct vs FathomSage Intacct vs BlackLinePlanful vs Oracle NetSuitePlanful vs VenaPlanful vs FathomPlanful vs BlackLineOracle NetSuite vs VenaOracle NetSuite vs FathomOracle NetSuite vs BlackLineVena vs FathomVena vs BlackLineFathom vs BlackLine
One product takes 78% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Ten of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5.4 mini changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM12%
4 of 34 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Anaplan and Oracle Cloud EPM (without an ELA)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Planful23%
5 of 22 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Your Use Case - Planful — Best for mid-market; per-user pricing makes scale expensive.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Anaplan Financial Consolidation
27%
3 of 11 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid Anaplan and Oracle Cloud EPM (without an ELA)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
CCH Tagetik8%
3 of 37 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Options to Avoid ... Quote-based with less pricing transparency” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1035 links across 271 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · HighRadius41 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OneStream38 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Maxima30 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
29 answers · 47 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Prophix29 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics19 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Planful17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 9 models
29 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial consolidation software”, “consolidation tools”, “financial consolidation software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OneStream onestream.com | 78% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 2 |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 8% | 8% | 326 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 3%, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close 3% | 5% | 542 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Workiva workiva.com | 3% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | |
| Board board.com | 3% | 147 | 90,500 | 612,482 | 44,405 | 106 | ||
| Workday parent site Workday Financial Management 3% | 3% | 110 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| CCH Tagetik wolterskluwer.com | 0% | 213 | 390 | 0 | 2,373,906 | $15,481 | 28 | 5 |
| SAP S/4HANA Finance sap.com SAP Group Reporting 0%, SAP BPC 0% | 0% | 54 | 720 | 98 | 2,214,514 company | $1,251 | 23 | |
| BlackLine blackline.com | 0% | 249 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 | $4,066 | 79 | |
| Prophix prophix.com | 0% | 249 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, highradius.com, onestream.com). The first result for “best financial consolidation software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial consolidation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-entity consolidation tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade consolidation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial consolidation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial consolidation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which consolidation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5OneStreamOracle NetSuiteChangedOneStreamOneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, HighRadius, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PlanfulThree alternatives
BlackLine, HighRadius, OneStreamFive alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
BoardGPT-5.4 miniOracle Financial Consolidation and Closeagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, WorkivaWorkday Financial ManagementChangedOneStreamagainst: Anaplan Financial Consolidation, HighRadiusOracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
OneStream, SAP Group ReportingTwo alternatives
Oracle Cloud Financials, SAP Group ReportingEleven alternatives
BlackLine, Board, CCH Tagetik, IBM Cognos Controller, Lucanet, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group Reporting, Vena, WorkivaOne alternative
OneStreamGemini 3.5 FlashOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamBoard, OneStreamagainst: Anaplan Financial Consolidation, BrizoConsol, Joiin, Konsolidator, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Oracle, SAP
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP Group ReportingThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PlanfulFour alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingOne alternative
Acumatica Cloud ERPPerplexity SonarOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamOneStreamno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteSix alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPC, SAP Group Reporting, WorkivaThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Group ReportingGrok 4.20OneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamOneStream, Workivaagainst: Oracle Financial Consolidation and Closeno first choiceagainst: Excel add-ons
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuiteEight alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Planful, Prophix, SAP Group Reporting, Vena, WorkivaTwo alternatives
CCH Tagetik, SAP BPCMistral SmallOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamOneStreamagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctSix alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, Planful, SAP Group ReportingDeepSeek V4 FlashOneStreamagainst: BlackLineOneStreamHeldOneStreamOneStreamagainst: Joiin, Konsolidator, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PlanfulOneStreamagainst: BlackLineagainst: Cube, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, Prophix, SAP BPC, SAP Group Reporting, Vena
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingSix alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, SAP Consolidation, VenaOne alternative
SAP Group ReportingTwo alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldOneStreamOneStreamno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, ProphixQwen 3.7 FlashOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamOneStreamagainst: CCH Tagetik, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Business Analyticsno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, BlackLine, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP S/4HANATwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuiteFour alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMKimi K2OneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamagainst: Informatica PowerCenter, Qlik Talend, SAP BPCOneStreamagainst: Anaplan Financial Consolidation, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Planfulno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, IBM Cognos Controller, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Group ReportingFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, WorkivaOne alternative
IBM Planning AnalyticsGLM 4.7 FlashXOneStreamOneStreamHeldFivetranOracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, SAP S/4HANA FinanceFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, HighRadius, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Group ReportingSix alternatives
Airbyte, Alteryx, Hevo Data, Nutanix, PlateSpin, VMware vSphereThree alternatives
HighRadius, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, OneStreamMiniMax M2.5OneStreamOneStreamHeldagainst: PlanfulOneStreamagainst: SAP Group Reportingno first choiceagainst: Acumatica Cloud ERP, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planfulno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Financial Close, Workday Financial ManagementOne alternative
Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMOne alternative
JoiinBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:27 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:01 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:19 | yes | 11 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:21 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:54 | yes | 25 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 18:22 | yes | 28 | 73 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:21 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:11 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:26 | yes | 19 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:37 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:57 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:15 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 17 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 30 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:15 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:39 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 10 | 69 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:57 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:36 | yes | 29 | 111 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:15 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:11 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:30 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:35 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:33 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:45 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:53 | yes | 13 | 14 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:54 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:00 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:28 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:43 | yes | 27 | 85 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:18 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:03 | yes | 17 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:05 | yes | 26 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:46 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 40 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 18:34 | yes | 25 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:23 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:53 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:36 | yes | 26 | 92 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:27 | yes | 20 | 71 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:04 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:13 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:18 | no | 0 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:43 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:30 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:08 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 27 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:18 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:38 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:08 | yes | 13 | 78 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:19 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:35 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:36 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:24 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:57 | yes | 23 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:42 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 19:11 | yes | 26 | 71 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 14 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 28 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:21 | yes | 25 | 250 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:24 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Anaplan read as Anaplan Financial Consolidation
Centage read as Centage Planning Maestro
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation and Close - FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud Service - FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation and Close) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle FCCS read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Oracle FCCS (Enterprise Tier) read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Prophix One read as Prophix
SAP Group Reporting read as SAP Group Reporting
SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting read as SAP Group Reporting
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wolters Kluwer read as CCH Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer / CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Apache Airflow
Dagster
Excel add-ons
Nutanix
Oracle Cloud Financials
PlateSpin (Broadcom)
Prefect
SAP Business Analytics
VMware vSphere
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.