Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › RPA › UiPath vs Robocorp
Robotic process automation · November 2026 Edition

UiPath vs Robocorp

Five of fourteen models named UiPath first on the direct prompt; zero named Robocorp. UiPath was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Robocorp by nine and UiPath carries 71 labels and Robocorp 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

UiPath

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

Robocorp

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share28%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 7; printed, not drawn.
Labels7111A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, UiPath reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Power Automate was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPath · Microsoft Power Automate vs Robocorp · UiPath vs Automation Anywhere

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the robotic process automation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UiPathFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRobocorp
Direct501 against UiPath
Paraphrase60
Comparative130
Budget-constrained21
Scale-constrained20
Negative207 against UiPath · 1 against Robocorp
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, UiPath and Robocorp were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 231 answers naming UiPath and the 39 naming Robocorp. In those answers Robocorp took the first choice one time and UiPath six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where UiPath and Robocorp stood in it.
ModelDirectROParaphraseROComparativeROBudget-constrainedROScale-constrainedRONegativeRO
Claude Haiku 4.5RO
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashRORO
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral SmallRO
DeepSeek V4 FlashRO
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashRO
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashXRO
MiniMax M2.5RO
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30BRO
UiPathRO Robocorp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, UiPath on the left and Robocorp on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where UiPath and Robocorp stood in it.

UiPath first, Robocorp not the choice

5 of 14 modelsRobocorp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniUiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
Mistral SmallUiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, ElectroNeek
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Zoho RPA
MiniMax M2.5UiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, ThinkAutomation

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Workato
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, UiPath
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Make, UiPath, Zapier
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Nintex, UiPath
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, UiPath
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: UiPath

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Muse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: ElectroNeek RPA and AI Platform, Rocketbot

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
UiPath leads by eight points.
UiPath9%#2 of 8
Robocorp2%#6 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
UiPath leads by twenty-six points.
UiPath28%#2 of 7
Robocorp2%#4 of 7
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Robocorp is not named for this buyer.
UiPath74%#1 of 9
Robocorp—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about UiPath

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Some AI models explicitly recommend avoiding UiPath unless you have a clear, large-scale need and budget” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if: You are a small team with limited budget → Stay away from UiPath” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-grade leaders such as UiPath continue to dominate overall RPA market share and enterprise rankings, but they are most often positioned for enterprise with dedicated automation teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · soft negative
“UiPath offers a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface with comprehensive toolset and strong community support, though it has high costs and a complex licensing model” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate are the top recommendations due to their scalability, strong feature sets, and integration capabilities” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“You want the market leader with proven scalability and AI | UiPath | Best overall feature set, strong community, and clear path to scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Robocorp

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“strong fit for Python developers, but not for teams looking for traditional drag-and-drop RPA builders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Recommended as the top free option... If you need a free solution, Robocorp is the best choice.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“For very tight budgets: Start with Robocorp or Microsoft Power Automate's free tier to learn and prototype.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for teams with Python developers looking to eliminate per-bot license fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.