Index › IT › Network and edge › Network monitoring › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Network monitoring and management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “network monitoring tool”, and as “network management and automation software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · ManageEngine OpManager 15%
15LogicMonitor15ManageEngine OpManager11Datadog Network Monitoring58others

15% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: LogicMonitor (15%) replaces SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (16% then, 8% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.LogicMonitor leads at 15%, replacing SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, which led at 16% and stands at 8% now: 7 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01LogicMonitor15%9%43accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 15%
02ManageEngine OpManager15%3%33accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.4% → 15%
03Datadog Network Monitoring11%18%38accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 4% → 11%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 11%
04Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform9%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 9%
05SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor8%15%33accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 16% → 8%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 8%
06Kentik6%9%23accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
07Checkmk6%6%16accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
08Cisco Catalyst Center6%0%11accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 15% → 6%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 6%
09Zabbix2%22%41accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
10Paessler PRTG Network Monitor2%41%37criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Nagios2%45%22criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Auvik0%25%12criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
14New Relic0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Dynatrace0%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Cisco ThousandEyes0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01LogicMonitor15%
02ManageEngine OpManager15%
03Datadog Network Monitoring11%
04Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform9%
05SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor8%
06Kentik6%
07Checkmk6%
08Cisco Catalyst Center6%
09Zabbix2%
10Paessler PRTG Network Monitor2%
11Nagios2%
12Dynatrace0%
13Cisco ThousandEyes0%
14New Relic0%
15Auvik0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
41%
15 of 37 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Sensor-based pricing can lead to unpredictable costs (200% price increases reported)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Nagios
45%
10 of 22 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“large enterprises should avoid legacy, manually configured open source stacks like Nagios Core for production-wide monitoring” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Datadog Network Monitoring
18%
7 of 38 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Cost Predictability: Avoid Datadog, Dynatrace, or ThousandEyes if your primary goal is cost control.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
SolarWinds Orion
100%
6 of 6 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“the SolarWinds supply chain attack, where hackers compromised a digitally signed SolarWinds Orion network monitoring component, opening a backdoor” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 847 links across 256 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 5 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Kentik29 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Checkmk29 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · New Relic25 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ManageEngine21 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Domotz20 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SolarWinds14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 18 citations · 5 models
12 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best network monitoring tool”, “network monitoring tool”, “network monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
LogicMonitor logicmonitor.com15%1845,40023682,441$1,63631
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine OpManager 15%
15%2238,100675
Datadog parent site
Datadog Network Monitoring 11%
11%8074,0003,541
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform redhat.com9%181,300101,347,338$281117
SolarWinds parent site
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor 8%, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager 2%, SolarWinds Observability 0%
9%9114,8001,396
Cisco parent site
Cisco Catalyst Center 6%, Cisco NSO 2%, Cisco ThousandEyes 0%
8%21165,00048,352
Kentik kentik.com6%33246,00062110,56924
Checkmk checkmk.com6%642,400535,59668
Gluware Intelligent Network Automation gluware.com4%5
Zabbix zabbix.com2%31312,10099218,8503

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.domotz.com, solarwinds.com). The first result for “best network monitoring tool” is itpro.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best network monitoring tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which network management and automation software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade network monitoring tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best network monitoring tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a network monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which network monitoring tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Three alternativesDatadog Infrastructure Pro, LogicMonitor, Zabbix
Cisco Catalyst CenterChanged
Four alternativesArista CloudVision, Juniper Contrail Enterprise Multicloud, Nokia AVA Network Services, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
no first choiceManageEngine OpManager
Two alternativesNetCrunch, Zabbix
against: Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
no first choiceagainst: SolarWinds Orion
GPT-5.4 miniDatadog Network Monitoring, Kentik
Three alternativesIBM SevOne, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Cisco NSOChanged
Three alternativesCisco Catalyst Center, HPE Edge Infrastructure Automation, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager
Datadog Network Monitoring
Three alternativesIBM SevOne, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, ThousandEyes
against: Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
ManageEngine OpManager
One alternativePaessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashDatadog Network Monitoring
Four alternativesCisco ThousandEyes, Dynatrace, Kentik, LogicMonitor
Itential Automation Platform, Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformChanged
Seven alternativesCisco Network Services Orchestrator, Cisco ThousandEyes, Gluware, Kentik, Nautobot, NetBox, ServiceNow
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Five alternativesCisco ThousandEyes, Datadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, NetBrain
Zabbix
Three alternativesCheckmk, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor
against: Datadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, ThousandEyes
no first choiceagainst: Cacti, MRTG, Nagios, Nmap, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Engineer's Toolset, SolarWinds Orion Platform, Spiceworks Network Monitor, Wireshark
Perplexity SonarLogicMonitor
Four alternativesCheckmk, Cisco ThousandEyes, Kentik, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
against: Zabbix
LogicMonitorHeld
Nine alternativesCisco Catalyst Center, IP Fabric, ManageEngine OpManager, NetBox Enterprise or NetBox Cloud, NetBrain, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Unimus
against: Cisco Crosswork
LogicMonitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Seven alternativesCheckmk, Datadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace, Kentik, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, ThousandEyes, Zabbix
ManageEngine OpManager
One alternativeZabbix
no first choiceagainst: LibreNMS, Nagios, Zabbix
Grok 4.20Datadog Network Monitoring
Three alternativesLogicMonitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Cisco Catalyst CenterChanged
Three alternativesGluware Intelligent Network Automation, Juniper Apstra, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
against: SolarWinds Network Automation Manager
ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Five alternativesDatadog Network Monitoring, ExtraHop, LogicMonitor, Nagios, Zabbix
against: Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
One alternativeCheckmk
against: Datadog Network Monitoring, Kentik, LibreNMS, LogicMonitor, New Relic, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Prometheus, Zabbix
no first choiceagainst: SolarWindsagainst: Nagios, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds, Zabbix
Mistral SmallDatadog Network Monitoring, Kentik, Virtana
Five alternativesManageEngine OpManager, PathSolutions TotalView, Site24x7, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Cisco Catalyst CenterChanged
Six alternativesHPE Aruba Central, Juniper Apstra, Nokia NSP, Red Hat Ansible Network Automation, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, VMware Aria Automation
Kentik
Five alternativesCisco ThousandEyes, Datadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Domotz, LogicMonitoragainst: Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Observabilityno first choiceagainst: SolarWinds Orionagainst: Auvik, Device42, LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpUtils, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
DeepSeek V4 FlashKentik, LogicMonitor
Four alternativesManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
against: Datadog Network Monitoring
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformChanged
Three alternativesCisco Catalyst Center, Gluware Intelligent Network Automation, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
against: ManageEngine OpManager
no first choice
Ten alternativesCisco ThousandEyes, Datadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace, Kentik, LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Checkmk
Three alternativesLogicMonitor, PRTG Enterprise Monitor, Zabbix
against: Datadog Network Monitoring, Kentik, New Relic, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
no first choiceagainst: Cacti, MRTG, Monit, Nagios, Observium, OpenNMS, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Orion, npm
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceLogicMonitorChanged
Two alternativesJuniper/Mist, ManageEngine OpManager
no first choiceCheckmk
Three alternativesLogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
no first choiceagainst: Auvik, Device42, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Qwen 3.7 FlashLogicMonitor
Three alternativesDatadog Network Monitoring, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
against: Nagios
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformChanged
Four alternativesItential, ManageEngine OpManager, NetBrain, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
no first choice
Four alternativesLogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Zabbix
against: SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
ManageEngine OpManager
Two alternativesPaessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
against: Datadog Network Monitoring, Splunk, Zabbix
no first choiceagainst: Auvik, Nagios, NetBrain, OpenNMS, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Orion, Zabbix
Kimi K2ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Three alternativesDatadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Zabbix
Gluware Intelligent Network AutomationChanged
Three alternativesAnsible, Cisco Catalyst Center, Juniper/Mist
Datadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace
Six alternativesLogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Nagios, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
ManageEngine OpManager
One alternativeZabbix
against: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds
no first choiceagainst: Checkmk, Zabbixagainst: Cacti, Nagios, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatadog Network Monitoring
Five alternativesLogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
NetBrain Systems, SolarWinds Network Automation ManagerChanged
Four alternativesGluware Intelligent Network Automation, ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, New Relic, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Datadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace
Six alternativesIBM Instana, LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, SolarWinds Observability, Zabbix
Checkmk
One alternativeLogicMonitor
against: Datadog Network Monitoring
no first choiceagainst: SolarWinds
MiniMax M2.5ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Three alternativesDatadog Network Monitoring, Dynatrace, Zabbix
Gluware Intelligent Network AutomationChanged
Three alternativesNETSCOUT nGenius, NetBrain Next-Gen, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
no first choiceNagios
One alternativeLogicMonitor
no first choiceagainst: Splunkagainst: SolarWinds Orion
GPT-6 LunaLogicMonitor
Three alternativesCisco ThousandEyes, Datadog Network Monitoring, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformChanged
Four alternativesCisco Catalyst Center, HPE Aruba Networking Central, Juniper/Mist, SolarWinds Observability
no first choiceNagios XI Sitewide
One alternativeZabbix
no first choice
Four alternativesDatadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds Observability, ThousandEyes
against: Nagios, Network Atlas, Observium Community Edition, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Orion
Muse Glimmer 30BDatadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor
Three alternativesPaessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformChanged
Four alternativesCisco Catalyst Center, ManageEngine OpManager, NetBox, SolarWinds Observability
no first choice
Twelve alternativesAuvik, Checkmk, Datadog Network Monitoring, Dotcom-Monitor, Kentik, LibreNMS, LogicMonitor, New Relic, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds, ThousandEyes, Zabbix
Netdata, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
One alternativeDomotz
against: Zabbix
no first choiceagainst: ManageEngine OpUtils, Nagios, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Orion NPM
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:42yes107 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:02yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:00yes1423 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:52yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:18yes514 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:46yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:36yes1729 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:37yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:55yes525 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:22yes936 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:18yes1424 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:29yes516 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:51yes425 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:31yes1220 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:34no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:35yes77 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:37no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:19yes105 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:34yes514 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:36no06 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:52yes2429 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:44yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:30yes537 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:45yes2025 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:41yes1422 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:36yes539 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:57yes513 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:29yes1519 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:24yes109 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:20yes510 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:38no015 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:12yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:01yes916 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:51yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:39yes2343 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:55yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:25no033 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:55yes1529 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:25yes24106 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:38yes1080 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:42yes937 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:53yes1228 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:54yes178 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:03yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:37yes1021 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:41yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:30yes512 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:43yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 19:15yes2569 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:09yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:08no031 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:33yes1931 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:21yes2442 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:13yes1339 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:46yes216 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:10yes2439 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:33no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:45yes27 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:49no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:40yes1010 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:34yes1014 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:57no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:55yes2242 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:59yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:11yes949 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:15yes2544 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:35yes2530 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:18no014 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:58yes419 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:36yes1524 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:31yes2710 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:50yes77 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:39no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:57yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:52yes1022 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:36yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:26yes2554 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:56yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:54yes1044 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:33yes2430 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:55yes1540 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:25yes2051 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:41yes522 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:08yes2433 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Datadog read as Datadog Network Monitoring
Datadog (Network Monitoring) read as Datadog Network Monitoring
Datadog Network Performance Monitoring read as Datadog Network Monitoring
PRTG read as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
PRTG (Paessler) read as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
PRTG Network Monitor read as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
PRTG Network Monitor (Paessler) read as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Paessler PRTG read as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
SolarWinds NPM read as SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Spiceworks read as Spiceworks Network Monitor
Unresolved, counted raw
Aruba IntroSpect
Cisco Crosswork
Cisco Network Services Orchestrator (NSO)
Cisco Stealtheatch
FirstWave NMIS
HPE Edge Infrastructure Automation
IBM Network Monitoring
Itential Automation Platform
Juniper Contrail Enterprise Multicloud
Kilter
LiveAction LiveNX
Nagios XI Sitewide
NetBox Enterprise or NetBox Cloud
NetBrain Next-Gen
NetBrain Systems
NetCrunch
Network Atlas
Nokia AVA Network Services
Nokia NSP (Network Services Platform)
OpenText Network Automation
Panopta
Red Hat Ansible Network Automation
SolarWinds Engineer's Toolset
SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability
SolarWinds Observability Self-Hosted
SolarWinds Orion NPM
SolarWinds Orion Platform
VMware Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← NACFirewalls →