Index › IT › Network and edge › Network monitoring › SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor vs Nagios
Network monitoring and management · November 2026 Edition

SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor vs Nagios

Zero of fourteen models named SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor first on the direct prompt; zero named Nagios. SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Nagios by thirteen and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor carries 35 labels and Nagios 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in three categories this edition.

Nagios

criticized challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%32%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3537A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ManageEngine OpManager was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Zabbix vs SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor · Zabbix vs Nagios · ManageEngine OpManager vs SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network monitoring and management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNagios
Direct00
Paraphrase001 against SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Comparative503 against Nagios
Budget-constrained013 against Nagios
Scale-constrained10
Negative104 against SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor · 6 against Nagios
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor and Nagios were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 105 answers naming SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor and the 161 naming Nagios. In those answers Nagios took the first choice zero times and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor and Nagios stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor Nagios first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor on the left and Nagios on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor and Nagios stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: Auvik, ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Mistral SmallManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, Kentik, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Qwen 3.7 FlashManageEngine OpManager alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
GLM 4.7 FlashXPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Gemini 3.5 FlashLogicMonitor alternatives: Auvik, Datadog Network Monitoring, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Grok 4.20ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Auvik, NinjaOne, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Llama 4 MaverickZabbix alternatives: Checkmk, Kentik, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, NinjaOne
Kimi K2Auvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
MiniMax M2.5ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor
GPT-6 LunaAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Muse Glimmer 30BLogicMonitor alternatives: LiveNX, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Nagios leads by two points.
Nagios2%#8 of 11
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor0%#11 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor2%#7 of 12
Nagios2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor leads at enterprise.
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor8%#5 of 15
Nagios2%#11 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Many organizations banned it entirely due to security concerns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“The 2020 SUNBURST supply-chain attack ... eroded trust. Ongoing vulnerabilities in the broader suite; use only with strict segmentation.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution is advised due to potential vulnerabilities and the need for rigorous security audits before deployment.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“The industry standard for pure network monitoring... extremely powerful packet-level troubleshooting; excellent reporting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SolarWinds NPM | Best Overall | Comprehensive network performance monitoring, strong alerting, intuitive interface” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For large, on‑prem networks with complex SNMP/flow needs: SolarWinds NPM or ManageEngine OpManager.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Nagios

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“I'd suggest starting with Zabbix or Nagios Core since they're completely free and enterprise-grade” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Stick to well-established, actively maintained tools like SolarWinds NPM, PRTG, Nagios, or Zeek” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.