Index › IT › Network and edge › Network monitoring › Zabbix vs SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Network monitoring and management · November 2026 Edition
Zabbix vs SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
One of fourteen models named Zabbix first on the direct prompt; zero named SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor. Zabbix was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor by thirteen and Zabbix carries 49 labels and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share27%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4935A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zabbix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ManageEngine OpManager was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager · Zabbix vs Auvik · Zabbix vs Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network monitoring and management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ZabbixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Direct103 against Zabbix
Paraphrase001 against SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Comparative051 against Zabbix
Budget-constrained120
Scale-constrained011 against Zabbix
Negative015 against Zabbix · 4 against SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zabbix and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Zabbix SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zabbix on the left and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zabbix and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor stood in it.
Zabbix first, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickZabbix alternatives: Checkmk, Kentik, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, NinjaOne
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: Auvik, ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Mistral SmallManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, Kentik, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Qwen 3.7 FlashManageEngine OpManager alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
GLM 4.7 FlashXPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Gemini 3.5 FlashLogicMonitor alternatives: Auvik, Datadog Network Monitoring, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Grok 4.20ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Auvik, NinjaOne, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Kimi K2Auvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
MiniMax M2.5ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor
GPT-6 LunaAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Muse Glimmer 30BLogicMonitor alternatives: LiveNX, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zabbix leads by thirteen points.
Zabbix13%#3 of 11SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor0%#11 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Zabbix leads by twenty-four points.
Zabbix27%#1 of 12SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor2%#7 of 12Enterprise
The order flips: SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor leads at enterprise.
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor8%#5 of 15Zabbix2%#9 of 15What the models said about Zabbix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Free/Open Source. Extremely powerful and customizable, but requires significant Linux/sysadmin expertise to maintain and tune. Only choose this if you have strong engineering talent.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“The best network monitoring tool for a company with a limited budget is Zabbix, as it is open-source and free to self-host” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Many organizations banned it entirely due to security concerns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“The 2020 SUNBURST supply-chain attack ... eroded trust. Ongoing vulnerabilities in the broader suite; use only with strict segmentation.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution is advised due to potential vulnerabilities and the need for rigorous security audits before deployment.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“The industry standard for pure network monitoring... extremely powerful packet-level troubleshooting; excellent reporting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SolarWinds NPM | Best Overall | Comprehensive network performance monitoring, strong alerting, intuitive interface” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For large, on‑prem networks with complex SNMP/flow needs: SolarWinds NPM or ManageEngine OpManager.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManagerZabbix vs AuvikZabbix vs Paessler PRTG Network MonitorZabbix vs LibreNMSZabbix vs LogicMonitorZabbix vs NagiosManageEngine OpManager vs SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorAuvik vs SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorPaessler PRTG Network Monitor vs SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorLibreNMS vs SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorLogicMonitor vs SolarWinds Network Performance MonitorSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor vs NagiosAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full network monitoring standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.