Zero trust network access for enterprise buyers
Asked as “ZTNA solution”, and as “zero trust remote access tool to replace a VPN”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
63%
Clear leader
63Zscaler Private Access21Cloudflare One12Microsoft Entra Private Access04others
63% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Zscaler Private Access held the lead, +10 points on 53%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cloudflare One53%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 58% → 53%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketCloudflare One36%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cloudflare One (36%) replaces Twingate (39% then, 36% now), 0 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Zscaler Private Access63%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Cloudflare One53%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 58% → 53%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketCloudflare One36%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cloudflare One (36%) replaces Twingate (39% then, 36% now), 0 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseZscaler Private Access63%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Zscaler Private Access63%10%69endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.53% → 63%
Zscaler Private Access63%10%69endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.53% → 63%02Cloudflare One21%6%65accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 12% → 21%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 21%
Cloudflare One21%6%65accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 12% → 21%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 21%03
Microsoft Entra Private Access12%0%28accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 5% → 12%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 12%
Microsoft Entra Private Access12%0%28accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 5% → 12%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 12%04
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access2%9%53accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 2%
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access2%9%53accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08
Twingate0%25%24criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Twingate0%25%24criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09
Cisco Secure Access0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Cisco Secure Access0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Fortinet Universal ZTNA0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Fortinet Universal ZTNA0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05
Netskope Private Access0%3%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Netskope Private Access0%3%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%06iboss ZTNA0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
Cloudflare One vs TwingateCloudflare One vs Cato NetworksCloudflare One vs Microsoft Entra Private Access
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Cloudflare One vs Zscaler Private AccessCloudflare One vs Check Point Harmony SASETwingate vs Cato NetworksTwingate vs Microsoft Entra Private AccessTwingate vs Zscaler Private AccessTwingate vs Check Point Harmony SASECato Networks vs Microsoft Entra Private AccessCato Networks vs Zscaler Private AccessCato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASEMicrosoft Entra Private Access vs Zscaler Private AccessMicrosoft Entra Private Access vs Check Point Harmony SASEZscaler Private Access vs Check Point Harmony SASE
One product takes 63% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zscaler Private Access10%
7 of 69 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Zscaler Private Access (due to security vulnerabilities and cost increases)” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access9%
5 of 53 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“often has more variable elements (e.g., bandwidth tiers or inspection-based costs), leading to less predictability in high-traffic scenarios” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Twingate25%
6 of 24 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid lighter tools like Tailscale or Twingate, which are better for smaller/dev-heavy teams” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt
Check Point Harmony SASE33%
3 of 9 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“rebranded VPNs like some Cisco or Check Point variants: These often lack continuous monitoring post-access” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 850 links across 209 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 35 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Cloudflare28 answers · 66 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zscaler27 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
vendor site · iboss19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CyberPress15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Portnox14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Fortinet13 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 5 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ztna solution”, “ztna solution”, “ztna solutions”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zscaler zscaler.com Zscaler Private Access 63%, Zscaler B2B 2% | 65% | 166 | 60,500 | 3,104 | 103,886 company | $9,116 | 66 | 1 |
| Cloudflare parent site Cloudflare One 21% | 21% | 355 | 550,000 | 10,897 | ||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra Private Access 12% | 12% | 51 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Palo Alto Networks parent site Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access 2% | 2% | 111 | 40,500 | 1,088 | ||||
| Netskope netskope.com Netskope Private Access 0% | 0% | 49 | 18,100 | 830 | 42,119 company | 27 | ||
| iboss ZTNA iboss.com | 0% | 16 | ||||||
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet Universal ZTNA 0%, Fortinet FortiSASE 0%, Fortinet FortiGate 0% | 0% | 179 | 49,500 | 2,339 | ||||
| Twingate twingate.com | 0% | 170 | 9,900 | 126 | 119,706 | 5 | ||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Secure Access 0% | 0% | 136 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| Akamai parent site Akamai Enterprise Application Access 0% | 0% | 15 | 27,100 | 1,614 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloudflare.com, fortinet.com, portnox.com, zscaler.com). The first result for “best ztna solution” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best ZTNA solution for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which zero trust remote access tool to replace a VPN would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade ZTNA solutions and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ZTNA solution for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a ZTNA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ZTNA solutions should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceZscaler Private AccessChangedno first choiceZscaler Private Accessagainst: Cloudflare Oneno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessEleven alternatives
Appgate SDP, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiGate, Google BeyondCorp Enterprise, Prisma Access, Prisma Cloud, Tailscale, Twingate, Zscaler Private AccessOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDGPT-5.4 miniZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldCloudflare OneMicrosoft Entra Private Accessagainst: Cloudflare Oneno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private AccessTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra Private Access, Privileged Remote AccessSix alternatives
Cato Networks, Cisco Secure Access, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessOne alternative
Netskope ZTNA NextGemini 3.5 FlashZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldagainst: Cisco AnyConnect, Palo Alto GlobalProtectZscaler Private AccessCloudflare Oneno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessSix alternatives
Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiSASE, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Netskope Private Access, Twingate, Zscaler Private AccessPerplexity SonarZscaler Private Accessagainst: Cisco Duo, Cisco Secure Access, TwingateZscaler Private AccessHeldagainst: TwingateZscaler Private AccessMicrosoft Entra Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Prisma AccessSix alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessGrok 4.20Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldagainst: Tailscale, TwingatePalo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private Accessagainst: Tailscale, TwingateZscaler Private Accessagainst: Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessZscaler Private Accessagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco, Citrix, Cloudflare One, Cytracom ControlOne, Ivanti Connect Secure, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Four alternatives
Cato Networks SASE, Cloudflare One, CrowdStrike Falcon Zero Trust, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft, Okta Access Gateway, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Akamai Enterprise Application Access, Cisco, Cloudflare One, Netskope Private AccessOne alternative
Microsoft Entra Private AccessFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessMistral SmallCloudflare One, Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private Accessno first choiceagainst: Cisco Duoagainst: Zscaler Private Access
Three alternatives
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Twingate, iboss ZTNAFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, TwingateSeven alternatives
Cato Networks ZTNA, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco Duo, Cloudflare One, FortiClient, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Akamai Enterprise Application Access, iboss ZTNADeepSeek V4 FlashZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private Accessagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Versa Networks ZTNA
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFour alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessEight alternatives
Akamai Enterprise Application Access, Cato Networks, Cisco, Cloudflare One, Microsoft, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, TwingateOne alternative
Cloudflare OneFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessLlama 4 MaverickZscaler Private AccessZscaler B2BChangedZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private Accessno first choiceagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private Access
Three alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, iboss ZTNATwo alternatives
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, Cloudflare OneThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, iboss ZTNAFour alternatives
Cato Networks, Cloudflare One, Twingate, iboss ZTNAQwen 3.7 FlashCloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private Accessagainst: TwingateMicrosoft Entra Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private Accessno first choiceagainst: AppGate ZTNA, Cisco Universal ZTNA, Citrix SecurAccess ZTNA, Okta Access Gateway, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Twingate, Zscaler Private Access
Two alternatives
Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Microsoft Entra Private AccessTwo alternatives
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessThree alternatives
Cisco, Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
Cloudflare OneKimi K2Cloudflare One, Zscaler Private AccessMicrosoft Entra Private Access, Zscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessCloudflare Oneagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessMicrosoft Entra Private Access, Zscaler Private Accessagainst: Cisco Secure Access
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessSeven alternatives
Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, iboss ZTNAOne alternative
Microsoft Entra Private AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessGLM 4.7 FlashXCloudflare One, Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessChangedagainst: Cisco Secure Client (AnyConnect) with Zero TrustZscaler Private AccessCloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Accessagainst: Zscaler Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Appgate SDP, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFive alternatives
Appgate SDP, Cato Networks, Cisco, Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessOne alternative
TwingateMiniMax M2.5no first choiceCloudflare One, Zscaler Private AccessChangedZscaler Private AccessCloudflare Oneno first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Netskope Private Access, Zscaler Private Access
Three alternatives
Cisco, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, TwingateSeven alternatives
Akamai Enterprise Application Access, Cato Networks SASE, Cloudflare One, CrowdStrike Falcon Zero Trust, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, TwingateTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra Private Access, Zscaler Private AccessGPT-6 LunaZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldno first choiceCloudflare Oneno first choiceagainst: BlackBerry CylanceGATEWAY, Proofpoint ZTNA
Four alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Global Secure Access, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, Prisma Access ZTNA ConnectorOne alternative
TwingateFour alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessMuse Glimmer 30BZscaler Private AccessZscaler Private AccessHeldZscaler Private AccessCloudflare Oneagainst: Zscaler Private Accessno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Okta Identity-Driven Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwo alternatives
Cloudflare One, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFive alternatives
Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Netskope Private Access, NPA, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, iboss ZTNATwo alternatives
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:02 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:42 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:19 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 138 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:51 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:06 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:16 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:10 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:41 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:13 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:39 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:31 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 15 | 59 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:52 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:04 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 21 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:10 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:43 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:24 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 20 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:20 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 14 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 14 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:27 | yes | 9 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:37 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:49 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:12 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 16 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 18 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 22 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 23 | 65 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:16 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akamai read as Akamai Enterprise Application Access
AppGate read as Appgate SDP
Appgate read as Appgate SDP
Check Point read as Check Point Harmony SASE
Check Point (Harmony SASE / Perimeter 81) read as Check Point Harmony SASE
Check Point (Perimeter 81) read as Check Point Harmony SASE
Cloudflare read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare (Cloudflare One) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare (Zero Trust Platform) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access (Cloudflare One) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access (Cloudflare Zero Trust) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access (part of Cloudflare One) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access (part of Cloudflare Zero Trust) read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Access / Cloudflare One read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare One / Access read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Zero Trust / Access read as Cloudflare One
Cloudflare Zero Trust / Cloudflare Access read as Cloudflare One
Fortinet read as Fortinet Universal ZTNA
Fortinet FortiClient read as Fortinet Universal ZTNA
Netskope read as Netskope Private Access
Okta read as Okta Access Gateway
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks (Cortex SecureConnect) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Access) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Zscaler read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (ZPA + ZIA) read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (ZPA) read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler (Zscaler Private Access) read as Zscaler Private Access
Zscaler Private Access, ZPA read as Zscaler Private Access
iboss read as iboss ZTNA
Unresolved, counted raw
AppGate ZTNA
BlackBerry CylanceGATEWAY
Cato Networks SASE
Cato Networks ZTNA
Cisco Secure Client
Cisco Secure Client (AnyConnect) with Zero Trust
Cloudflare Tunnel
CrowdStrike Falcon Remote Access
Cytracom ControlOne
Netskope Private Access, NPA
Netskope ZTNA Next
Prisma Access ZTNA Connector
Privileged Remote Access
Proofpoint ZTNA
Versa Networks ZTNA
Zscaler B2B
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.