Seven of fourteen models named Cato Networks first on the direct prompt; two named Check Point Harmony SASE. Cato Networks was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Check Point Harmony SASE by thirteen and Cato Networks carries 15 labels and Check Point Harmony SASE 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the zero trust network access page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cato Networks and Check Point Harmony SASE were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 143 answers naming Cato Networks and the 153 naming Check Point Harmony SASE. In those answers Check Point Harmony SASE took the first choice one time and Cato Networks twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Want networking and security converged in one mid-market SASE platform: Cato Networks – the mid-market SASE convergence pick.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“warnings to avoid or delay adoption of Check Point Harmony SASE until you verify that their remediation for any security issues is architectural” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid vendors still pushing VPN-like ZTNA (e.g., some older Check Point or Fortinet setups without full SASE evolution).” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Also placed in the "lagging" category by QKS Reviews” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Start with Cloudflare One or Check Point Harmony if you want simplicity, transparent pricing, and fast time-to-value” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Cato Networks or Check Point Harmony SASE offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and value” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“A consolidated ZTNA and web security solution that provides secure access to applications and resources.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.