November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Data platform › Orchestration › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Workflow orchestration for enterprise buyers

Asked as “workflow orchestration tool”, and as “data pipeline orchestrator”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Temporal 16%
29Apache Airflow16Temporal13Camunda Platform 842others

29% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Apache Airflow held the lead, +3 points on 26%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Apache Airflow29%24%68accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 26% → 29%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.26% → 29%
02Temporal16%14%42accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 16%
03Camunda Platform 813%0%46accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 13%
04Prefect7%18%51accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 13% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 7%
05Dagster5%23%44accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 9% → 5%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 5%
06Workato5%19%31accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 6% → 5%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 5%
07Astronomer Astro2%5%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
08Microsoft Power Automate2%22%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
09ServiceNow Workflow2%22%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10Kestra2%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the ten products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
19Make0%64%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
20Zapier0%62%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
18Appian0%42%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
16Azure Logic Apps0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
15AWS Step Functions0%38%24criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
17n8n0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11BMC Control-M0%20%20accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%
14Google Cloud Composer Lab in the set0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Argo Workflows0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Cloud Composer is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
C03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
B11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Apache Airflow29%
02Temporal16%
03Camunda Platform 813%
04Prefect7%
05Dagster5%
06Workato5%
07Astronomer Astro2%
08Microsoft Power Automate2%
09ServiceNow Workflow2%
10Kestra2%
11BMC Control-M0%
12Argo Workflows0%
13Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow0%
14Google Cloud Composer0%
15AWS Step Functions0%
16Azure Logic Apps0%
17n8n0%
18Appian0%
19Make0%
20Zapier0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zapier
62%
10 of 16 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Why avoid: These are primarily no-code tools designed for simple, lightweight automation. They are not suitable for enterprise-scale data infrastructure” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Apache Airflow
24%
16 of 68 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Apache Airflow - 31% of labels were negative, with 12 out of 14 models indicating it as a bad choice, especially for budget constraints.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Make
64%
9 of 14 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Zapier, Make, n8n | Designed for individual users or small teams; lack enterprise-grade governance, security, auditability, and scalability.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
AWS Step Functions
38%
9 of 24 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Cloud-provider-native orchestrators when portability matters... Examples include AWS Step Functions... they can also increase switching costs” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 13 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 826 links across 266 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 1 model searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition. 31 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Zapier28 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Kestra22 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · BMC20 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ONES.com16 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GitHub14 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow12 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Beta Systems11 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 15 citations · 5 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workflow orchestration tool”, “workflow orchestration tool”, “workflow orchestration tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Apache Airflow apache.org29%2028,1002711,144,0250
Temporal temporal.io16%9349,50013,89641,18170
Camunda Platform 8 camunda.com13%8113,96035
Prefect prefect.io7%14014,8001,1598,198$6916
Dagster dagster.io5%1215,40014323,40734
Workato workato.com5%8014,80040538,042$20120
Beta Systems ANOW! Suite betasystems.com4%2
IBM parent site
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 2%, IBM Business Automation Workflow 2%
4%5201,00034,098
Astronomer astronomer.io
Astronomer Astro 2%
2%291701277,826 company46
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Power Automate 2%
2%3232,240,000403,136

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (github.com, thedigitalprojectmanager.com). The first result for “best workflow orchestration tool” is guptadeepak.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best workflow orchestration tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data pipeline orchestrator would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workflow orchestration tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workflow orchestration tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workflow orchestration tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workflow orchestration tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceApache AirflowChanged
Six alternativesAzure Data Factory, BMC Control-M, Dagster, Google Cloud Composer, Prefect, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
no first choice
Five alternativesApache Airflow, BMC Control-M, Camunda Platform 8, Prefect, Workato
Prefectagainst: Apache Airflow, Dagsterno first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow, Appian, ServiceNow Workflow, Zapier
GPT-5.4 miniIBM Business Automation Workflow, IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Three alternativesApache Airflow, IBM Workload Automation, IBM watsonx Orchestrate
Apache AirflowChanged
One alternativedbt platform orchestration
against: Dagster, Prefect
Apache Airflow
Six alternativesAWS Step Functions, Argo Workflows, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, Prefect, Temporal
Apache Airflow
One alternativeTemporal
against: Dagster, Prefect
no first choiceagainst: AWS Step Functions, Azure Logic Apps, Google Cloud Workflows, Jenkins-based orchestration, Microsoft Power Automate
Gemini 3.5 FlashTemporal
Eight alternativesAWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Netflix Conductor, Prefect, Workato
Apache Airflow, Dagster, PrefectChanged
One alternativeAstronomer Astro
Apache Airflow
Five alternativesAWS Step Functions, Argo Workflows, Dagster, Prefect, Temporal
Temporal
Four alternativesAmazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Camunda Platform 8
Astronomer Astro
Five alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Dagster, Prefect, Temporal, Workato
against: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Apache Oozie, Azkaban, Azure Logic Apps, GCP Workflows, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Homegrown Cron / Custom Python Scripts, Jenkins, Luigi, Make, Workato, Zapier
Perplexity SonarWorkato
Five alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Enate, Microsoft Power Automate, Temporal, n8n
Apache AirflowChanged
Five alternativesAWS Step Functions, Astronomer Astro, Azure Data Factory, Dagster, Kestra
Temporal
Nine alternativesApache Airflow, Argo Workflows, BMC Control-M, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, Microsoft Power Automate, Prefect, ServiceNow Workflow, Workato
Microsoft Power Automate
Two alternativesApache Airflow, Camunda Platform 8
against: BMC Control-M, Workato
no first choiceagainst: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Appian, Argo Workflows, Azure Logic Apps, BMC Control-M, Broadcom Automic/AutoSys, Dagster, Make, Pega, Prefect, ServiceNow Workflow, Temporal, Zapier
Grok 4.20Camunda Platform 8
Six alternativesApache Airflow, Appian, Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Workflow, UiPath, Workato
against: Make, Zapier, n8n
Apache AirflowChanged
Four alternativesAstronomer Astro, Dagster, Prefect, Temporal
against: AWS Step Functions, Azure Data Factory, GCP Workflows, Kubeflow, Luigi
Apache Airflow
Five alternativesArgo Workflows, Dagster, Kestra, Prefect, Temporal
against: ActiveBatch, BMC Control-M, RunMyJobs
ServiceNow Workflow
One alternativeCamunda Platform 8
against: Apache Airflow, Appian, Dagster, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, Prefect, UiPath, Workato
Dagster, Prefect
Four alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Kestra, Temporal, Workato
against: Apache Airflow
against: Apache Airflow, Apache Oozie, Jenkins, Luigi
Mistral SmallWorkato
Two alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Microsoft Power Automate
Apache AirflowChanged
Four alternativesBMC Control-M, Dagster, Orchestra, Prefect
Camunda Platform 8
Eight alternativesApache Airflow, Automation Anywhere, IBM watsonx Orchestrate, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Orchestration, UiPath, Workato
Beta Systems ANOW! Suiteagainst: BMC Control-M, Broadcom Automic Automationno first choiceagainst: Appian, Make, Microsoft Copilot Studio, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, ServiceNow Workflow, Workato, Zapier
DeepSeek V4 FlashCamunda Platform 8, Temporal
Two alternativesApache Airflow, Workato
Apache AirflowChanged
Three alternativesAmazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, Google Cloud Composer
against: AWS Step Functions, Azure Data Factory, Dagster, Prefect
no first choice
Ten alternativesAWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Azure Logic Apps, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, Google Cloud Workflows, Kestra, Prefect, Temporal
Camunda Platform 8
Two alternativesBMC Control-M, ServiceNow Workflow
Temporal
Three alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Hatchet, Prefect
against: Apache Airflow, n8n
against: Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Ballerina, Luigi, Oozie, Tekton, Temporal
Llama 4 MaverickApache Airflow
Four alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Kore.ai, Prefect, Temporal
Apache Airflow, PrefectChangedno first choiceBeta Systems ANOW! Suite
Four alternativesApache Airflow, BMC Control-M, Camunda Platform 8, Prefect
no first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow, Make, Zapier
Qwen 3.7 FlashApache Airflow
Three alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Temporal, Workato
Apache AirflowHeld
Five alternativesAmazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, Dagster, Google Cloud Composer, Kestra
BMC Control-M
Three alternativesRedwood Software, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center, Workato
against: Automic
Kestra, Prismatic.io
Two alternativesCamunda Platform 8, Microsoft Power Automate
against: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Workato
no first choiceagainst: AWS Step Functions, Apache Oozie, Asana, IFTTT, Jira, Kubernetes CronJobs, Luigi, Make, Python, Trello, UiPath Enterprise Automation, Zapier
Kimi K2Camunda Platform 8, Temporal
One alternativeApache Airflow
Apache AirflowChanged
Five alternativesAmazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, Dagster, Google Cloud Composer, Prefect
Apache Airflow
Seven alternativesAWS Step Functions, Argo Workflows, Azure Logic Apps, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, Prefect, Temporal
Camunda Platform 8
One alternativeApache Airflow
against: Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, Temporal, Workato, Zapier/Make
no first choice
Four alternativesApache Airflow, Camunda Platform 8, Flowable, Temporal
against: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Azure Logic Apps, Google Cloud Workflows, IFTTT, Make, Temporal, Zapier
GLM 4.7 FlashXWorkato
Four alternativesApache Airflow, Azure Logic Apps, Camunda Platform 8, Temporal
Apache AirflowChanged
One alternativeAstronomer Astro
against: Dagster, Prefect
Apache Airflow
Eight alternativesApache NiFi, Argo Workflows, Azure Data Factory, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, Prefect, Temporal, n8n
Temporal
Three alternativesAstronomer Astro, Dagster, Prefect
no first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow, Appian, Cron, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, ServiceNow Workflow, Zapier, n8n
MiniMax M2.5Camunda Platform 8
Two alternativesServiceNow Workflow, Workato
Apache AirflowChanged
Three alternativesAmazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Astronomer Astro, Dagster
against: AWS Step Functions, Azure Data Factory, Prefect
no first choice
Eight alternativesAWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Azure Logic Apps, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, Google Cloud Workflows, ServiceNow Workflow, Temporal
Orchestraagainst: Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, Apache Airflow, Dagster, Google Cloud Composer, Microsoft Power Automate, Prefect, Temporalno first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow, Apache Oozie, Azkaban, Cron-based systems, Dagster, Google Cloud Composer, Kestra, Luigi, Make, Orchest, Zapier
GPT-6 LunaTemporal
Three alternativesApache Airflow, Camunda Platform 8, Workato
DagsterChanged
One alternativeApache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Seven alternativesAWS Step Functions, Argo Workflows, BMC Control-M, Camunda Platform 8, Dagster, Prefect, Temporal
Microsoft Power Automate Process
One alternativeCamunda Platform 8
Temporal
Three alternativesAWS Step Functions, Camunda Platform 8, Prefect
against: AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Camunda Self-Managed, Temporal, n8n
Muse Glimmer 30BCamunda Platform 8, Temporal
Nine alternativesAppian, BMC Control-M, Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Pega, Redwood Software, ServiceNow Workflow, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center, Workato
Apache AirflowChanged
Two alternativesBMC Control-M, Dagster
no first choice
Eight alternativesAWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow, Argo Workflows, Azure Data Factory, BMC Control-M, Camunda Platform 8, Google Cloud Workflows, Temporal
Frends, Tray.ai
Three alternativesApache Airflow, Cflow, Microsoft Power Automate
no first choiceagainst: Azkaban, Cadence, Dagster, Kestra, Luigi, Maestro, Orchest, Prefect
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:06no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:40yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:35no013 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:45yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:16yes515 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:51yes510 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:58yes2319 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:48yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:34yes528 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:23yes1035 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:00yes1432 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:10yes528 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:01yes410 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:44yes1420 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:29yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:19yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:06no018 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:24yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:05yes543 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:39yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:18yes2534 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:31yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:12no028 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:54yes1423 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:13yes2544 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:52yes553 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:45yes213 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:00yes1520 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:40yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:44yes610 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:59no022 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:46yes109 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:14yes517 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:04yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:03yes2454 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:33yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:01yes1030 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:07yes2545 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:59no029 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:06yes1032 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:23yes933 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:28yes2448 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:35yes199 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:29yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:40no018 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:45yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:48yes510 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:52yes59 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 19:23yes2447 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:42yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:50yes971 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:28yes2565 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:54yes2438 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:07yes835 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:44yes320 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:01yes2038 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:31yes1816 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:54yes38 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:38no020 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:58yes1010 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:57yes1018 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:39no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:33yes2557 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:19yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:24yes1046 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:05yes1530 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:33yes1015 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:36no018 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:28yes523 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:10yes1522 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:53yes1911 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:36yes47 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:10no020 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:30yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:56yes2519 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:55yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:01no020 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:25yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:36no035 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:33yes2565 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:29yes2536 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:04yes2588 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:30yes517 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:15yes2338 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Argo read as Argo Workflows
Astronomer read as Astronomer Astro
Astronomer (Astro) read as Astronomer Astro
Astronomer (Managed Apache Airflow) read as Astronomer Astro
BMC read as BMC Control-M
BMC (Control-M) read as BMC Control-M
Camunda read as Camunda Platform 8
Camunda (Camunda 8 Enterprise) read as Camunda Platform 8
Camunda 8 read as Camunda Platform 8
Camunda 8 (Enterprise) read as Camunda Platform 8
Camunda Enterprise read as Camunda Platform 8
MuleSoft read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Workflow
Stonebranch read as Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
Unresolved, counted raw
Ballerina
Camunda Self-Managed
Cron-based systems
Durable Functions
Frends
Hatchet
Homegrown Cron / Custom Python Scripts
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
IBM Workload Automation
Informatica Data Integration / Talend
Jenkins-based orchestration
Kubernetes CronJobs
Microsoft Power Automate Process
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Orchestration
Oracle Integration/Process Automation
Prismatic.io
Self-Hosted Airflow
ServiceNow Orchestration
UiPath Enterprise Automation
dbt platform orchestration
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Vector databasesPassword managers →