Data masking and test data management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “data masking tool”, and as “test data management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Delphix 8%
27Perforce Delphix08Delphix08Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud57others
27% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Perforce Delphix (27%) replaces Delphix (27% then, 8% now), 19 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Perforce Delphix leads at 27%, replacing Delphix, which led at 27% and stands at 8% now: 19 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
DataVeil18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: DataVeil (18%) replaces IRI FieldShield (22% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketDATPROF Privacy22%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 17% → 22%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Perforce Delphix27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Perforce Delphix (27%) replaces Delphix (27% then, 8% now), 19 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This page
DataVeil18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: DataVeil (18%) replaces IRI FieldShield (22% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketDATPROF Privacy22%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 17% → 22%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterprisePerforce Delphix27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Perforce Delphix (27%) replaces Delphix (27% then, 8% now), 19 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Perforce Delphix27%0%20accepted challenger▲+17Since October 2026: 10% → 27%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.10% → 27%
Perforce Delphix27%0%20accepted challenger▲+17Since October 2026: 10% → 27%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.10% → 27%02
Delphix8%26%42criticized challenger▼−19Since October 2026: 27% → 8%, −19 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.27% → 8%
Delphix8%26%42criticized challenger▼−19Since October 2026: 27% → 8%, −19 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.27% → 8%03
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud8%30%37criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud8%30%37criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%04
K2View Test Data Management6%5%40accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
K2View Test Data Management6%5%40accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%05
Broadcom Test Data Manager6%10%20accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Broadcom Test Data Manager6%10%20accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%06
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting4%21%28accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting4%21%28accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%07DATPROF Privacy4%9%11accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
08IBM InfoSphere Optim2%4%23accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 2%
09IRI FieldShield2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Protegrity0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
DATPROF Privacy vs DelphixDATPROF Privacy vs K2View Test Data ManagementDATPROF Privacy vs GreenmaskDataVeil vs IRI FieldShieldDataVeil vs Tonic.aiDataVeil vs DelphixDataVeil vs K2View Test Data ManagementDataVeil vs GreenmaskIRI FieldShield vs Tonic.aiIRI FieldShield vs DelphixIRI FieldShield vs K2View Test Data ManagementIRI FieldShield vs GreenmaskTonic.ai vs DelphixTonic.ai vs K2View Test Data ManagementTonic.ai vs GreenmaskDelphix vs K2View Test Data ManagementDelphix vs GreenmaskK2View Test Data Management vs Greenmask
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506D07
I08
I09
P10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Perforce Delphix27%
Perforce Delphix27%02Delphix8%
Delphix8%03Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud8%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud8%04K2View Test Data Management6%
K2View Test Data Management6%05Broadcom Test Data Manager6%
Broadcom Test Data Manager6%06Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting4%
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting4%07DATPROF Privacy4%
08IBM InfoSphere Optim2%
09IRI FieldShield2%
10Protegrity0%
What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Delphix26%
11 of 42 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“avoid per-user SaaS and per-TB consumption models such as Delphix per-TB” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud30%
11 of 37 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid consumption" and "Avoid consumption-based models - Tools like Informatica (IPU-based) ... can have variable costs that spike with usage.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Fogger
100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“tools like Fogger or Masked-AI exist, they are generally not recommended for enterprises due to scalability and support limitations” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting21%
6 of 28 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Examples include relying strictly on Oracle Data Masking or IBM DB2 utilities when your architecture spans AWS, Azure, Snowflake, and on-prem legacy systems.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 971 links across 252 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 47 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · K2view42 answers · 94 citations · 13 models
vendor site · OvalEdge32 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Perforce24 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G224 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · IRI22 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
publisher (Gane)16 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Airbyte15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 12 models
20 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data masking tool”, “data masking tool”, “data masking tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perforce perforce.com Perforce Delphix 27% | 27% | 30 | 110 | 3 | 161,450 company | $2,860 | 100 | |
| Delphix delphix.com Delphix 8%, Delphix Masking 2% | 10% | 105 | 1,900 | 19 | 758 | |||
| Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud informatica.com | 8% | 366 | 390 | 1 | 73,321 | 120 | ||
| K2View Test Data Management k2view.com K2View Test Data Management 6%, K2view Enterprise Data Masking 2% | 8% | 94 | 40 | 0 | 22,241 | 38 | 1 | |
| Informatica parent site Informatica TDM 4%, Informatica Cloud Data Masking 2%, Informatica Persistent Data Masking 2% | 8% | 13 | 14,800 | 1,414 | ||||
| Broadcom parent site Broadcom Test Data Manager 6% | 6% | 32 | 20 | 0 | ||||
| DataVeil dataveil.com | 6% | 36 | ||||||
| Oracle parent site Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting 4% | 4% | 53 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| DATPROF Privacy datprof.com | 4% | 61 | 790 | 8 | ||||
| Gigantics gigantics.io | 4% | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (iri.com, k2view.com, ovaledge.com). The first result for “best data masking tool” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best data masking tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which test data management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade data masking tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data masking tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a data masking tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data masking tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceBroadcom Test Data ManagerChangedDelphixMicrosoft SQL Serveragainst: Delphixno first choiceagainst: DATPROF Privacy, Microsoft's Dynamic Data Masking
Three alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management, Informatica Test Data Management, K2View Test Data ManagementThree alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Optim, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data ManagementThree alternatives
Informatica Cloud Data Masking, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, ProtegrityGPT-5.4 miniDelphix Masking, Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingDATPROF PrivacyChangedIBM InfoSphere Optim, Oracle Data Masking and Subsettingagainst: ProtegrityOracle Data Masking and Subsettingagainst: K2View Test Data Managementno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Informatica Data & AI Governance, Privacy, K2View Test Data ManagementFive alternatives
Broadcom CA Test Data Manager, Delphix, K2View Test Data Management, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Tonic.aiThree alternatives
Broadcom CA Test Data Manager / Data Masking, Delphix Data Masking, Informatica Cloud Data MaskingOne alternative
Informatica's masking/Test Data Management offeringsGemini 3.5 FlashImmuta, Tonic.aiDelphixChangedDelphix, IBM InfoSphere OptimPerforce Delphixno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data Management, Perforce Delphix, PrivaceraThree alternatives
Informatica Enterprise Data Masking & TDM, K2view TDM, Tonic.aiFour alternatives
Immuta, Informatica Cloud Data Masking, Privacera, SecuPiFour alternatives
Databricks, IRI FieldShield, MS SQL Server, Snowflake Dynamic Data MaskingPerplexity SonarDelphixPerforce DelphixChangedDelphixagainst: Microsoft SQL ServerGiganticsagainst: Delphix, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Redgate Data Maskerno first choiceagainst: ARX, Microsoft Presidio, Microsoft SQL Server Dynamic Data Masking, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting
Two alternatives
Informatica Persistent Data Masking, K2View Test Data ManagementFour alternatives
Broadcom Test Data Manager, Informatica TDM, K2View Test Data Management, Tonic.aiSeven alternatives
DATPROF Privacy, IBM InfoSphere Optim, Immuta, Informatica Cloud Data Masking, K2View Test Data Management, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, ProtegrityGrok 4.20Informatica Cloud Data Maskingagainst: Faker, HashiCorp VaultBroadcom Test Data ManagerChangedInformatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Perforce Delphixagainst: HashiCorp VaultDelphixInformatica Persistent Data Maskingagainst: Delphix, Fogger, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Masked-AI, Oracle Data Redaction, SQL Server Dynamic Data Masking
Four alternatives
K2View Test Data Management, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Protegrity, Thales CipherTrust Data Security PlatformThree alternatives
Delphix, Informatica Test Data Management, K2View Test Data ManagementFour alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Optim, K2View Test Data Management, Protegrity Data Protection Platform, Thales CipherTrust Data Security PlatformFive alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Optim / Guardium, Informatica Persistent Data Masking, K2View Test Data Management, Privacera, ProtegrityFive alternatives
Delphix, IBM InfoSphere Optim, K2View Test Data Management, Privacera, ProtegrityMistral SmallInformatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Perforce DelphixIBM InfoSphere Optim, Informatica TDMChangedno first choiceGiganticsagainst: Delphix, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data Managementno first choiceagainst: Fogger, Informatica IPU-based models, Masked-AI, SQL Server's native masking
Three alternatives
Baffle, K2view Enterprise Data Masking, Protegrity's Data Protection PlatformDeepSeek V4 FlashPerforce DelphixBroadcom Test Data ManagerChangedPerforce DelphixK2View Test Data Managementagainst: DataMasque, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Masking Pack, PrivacyScrubberPerforce Delphixagainst: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloudagainst: ARX, Broadcom Test Data Manager, Delphix, Faker, Greenmask, PostgreSQL Anonymizer
Two alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data ManagementThree alternatives
Delphix, Informatica TDM, K2View Test Data ManagementSix alternatives
Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM Guardium Data Protection, IRI FieldShield, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2view Enterprise Data Masking, Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingOne alternative
DelphixThree alternatives
Immuta, K2View Test Data Management, ProtegrityLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceK2View Test Data ManagementChangedDelphixno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Delphix, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft SQL Server Dynamic Data Masking
Four alternatives
Delphix, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Tonic.aiSix alternatives
IBM, Immuta, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data Management, Microsoft, OracleQwen 3.7 FlashInformatica Intelligent Data Management CloudInformatica TDM, K2View Test Data ManagementChangedDelphixDataVeilagainst: Dell EMC PowerStore, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloudno first choiceagainst: IBM DB2 utilities, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting
Three alternatives
K2View Test Data Management, Perforce Delphix, ProtegrityOne alternative
IBM InfoSphere OptimSix alternatives
IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Micro Focus, Microsoft, OpenText, RedgateThree alternatives
Databricks Native Masking, Delphix, Snowflake Dynamic Data MaskingKimi K2Perforce DelphixPerforce DelphixHeldagainst: Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudPerforce DelphixDataVeilagainst: DataMasque, IBM InfoSphere Optimno first choiceagainst: Fogger
Four alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data Management, OvalEdge, Protegrity Data Protection PlatformOne alternative
K2View Test Data ManagementSix alternatives
Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Data Product Platform, Protegrity Data Protection Platform, Thales CipherTrust Data Security PlatformTwo alternatives
Delphix, IRI FieldShield / DarkShieldGLM 4.7 FlashXInformatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Perforce DelphixPerforce DelphixChangedDelphixDataVeilagainst: Delphixno first choiceagainst: Fogger, Masked‑AI, Percona Server
Three alternatives
BMC AMI DevX, Broadcom Test Data Manager, K2view Enterprise Data MaskingTwo alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Optim, Informatica Test Data ManagementFour alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Optim, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data Management, ProtegrityOne alternative
Redgate Test Data ManagerMiniMax M2.5K2view Enterprise Data Masking, Perforce DelphixDelphix, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudChangedK2View Test Data ManagementGuepardagainst: Delphix, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloudno first choiceagainst: AWS Comprehend, Microsoft Presidio, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Salesforce Data Mask
Three alternatives
Broadcom Test Data Manager, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Protegrity Data Protection PlatformTwo alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Optim, K2View Test Data ManagementSix alternatives
Delphix, IBM InfoSphere Optim, IRI FieldShield, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Protegrity, SatoriTwo alternatives
Gigantics, PrivacyScrubberGPT-6 LunaDelphix Continuous CompliancePerforce DelphixChangedno first choiceagainst: SQL Server Dynamic Data MaskingIRI FieldShieldagainst: Delphixno first choiceagainst: Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Snowflake Dynamic Data Masking
Two alternatives
Informatica Test Data Management, Tonic.aiTwo alternatives
Informatica TDM, K2View Test Data ManagementSeven alternatives
Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim, Informatica Cloud Data Masking, K2View Test Data Management, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Perforce Delphix, Tonic.aiOne alternative
DATPROF PrivacyMuse Glimmer 30BPerforce DelphixPerforce DelphixHeldDelphixagainst: Oracle Data Masking and SubsettingDATPROF Privacyagainst: DataMasque, Delphix, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloudno first choiceagainst: Broadcom Test Data Manager, Dataprof, Delphix, Fogger, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Informatica Persistent Data Masking, Masked-AI, Microsoft SQL Server Dynamic Data Masking, Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, Percona Server
Three alternatives
IBM Guardium Data Protection, Informatica Persistent Data Masking, K2View Test Data ManagementTwo alternatives
Informatica TDM, K2View Test Data ManagementSeven alternatives
Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim, Immuta, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, K2View Test Data Management, Protegrity, Thales CipherTrust Data Security PlatformThree alternatives
Gigantics, IRI FieldShield, Tonic.aiBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:23 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:52 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 23 | 59 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:21 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:29 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:40 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 24 | 97 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:40 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:53 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:45 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 18 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:42 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:59 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:11 | yes | 22 | 112 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:26 | yes | 21 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 21 | 81 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:18 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:30 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:44 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 24 | 123 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:14 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:25 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:37 | yes | 23 | 105 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 22 | 73 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 16 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Broadcom read as Broadcom Test Data Manager
DATPROF read as DATPROF Privacy
Datprof read as DATPROF Privacy
IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy read as IBM InfoSphere Optim
IBM Optim read as IBM InfoSphere Optim
IBM Optim Data Privacy read as IBM InfoSphere Optim
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (CDGC) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (IDMC) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (Persistent Data Masking) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
K2View read as K2View Test Data Management
K2view read as K2View Test Data Management
Oracle Data Masking read as Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting
Oracle Data Masking & Subsetting read as Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting
Snowflake read as Snowflake Dynamic Data Masking
Unresolved, counted raw
Baffle Advanced Data Protection
Broadcom CA Test Data Manager
Broadcom CA Test Data Manager / Data Masking
Compuguard/IRI FieldShield
Databricks Native Masking
Dataprof
Delphix Continuous Compliance
Google Cloud Data Loss Prevention
Guepard
IBM DB2 utilities
IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management
Informatica Enterprise Data Masking & TDM
Informatica Enterprise Data Protection
Informatica IPU-based models
Informatica's masking/Test Data Management offerings
MS SQL Server
Masked‑AI
Microsoft's Dynamic Data Masking
Oracle Data Masking Pack
Privitar
SQL Server's native masking
Tapestritech
TokenEx
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.