Data catalogs and governance for enterprise buyers
Asked as “data catalog”, and as “data governance platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Atlan 23%
38Collibra23Atlan10Alation29others
38% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−3Since October 2026: 41% → 38%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Collibra held the lead, −3 points on 41%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Secoda19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secoda (19%) replaces OpenMetadata (18% then, 19% now), 0 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Atlan35%Contested▼−9Since October 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Collibra38%Contested▼−3Since October 2026: 41% → 38%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Secoda19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secoda (19%) replaces OpenMetadata (18% then, 19% now), 0 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketAtlan35%Contested▼−9Since October 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseCollibra38%Contested▼−3Since October 2026: 41% → 38%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Collibra38%17%72endorsed leader▼−3Since October 2026: 41% → 38%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.41% → 38%
Collibra38%17%72endorsed leader▼−3Since October 2026: 41% → 38%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.41% → 38%02Atlan23%13%60accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 28% → 23%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.28% → 23%
Atlan23%13%60accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 28% → 23%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.28% → 23%03
Alation10%16%61accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 15% → 10%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 10%
Alation10%16%61accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 15% → 10%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 10%04
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud6%19%42accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud6%19%42accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%05
DataHub6%32%31criticized challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
DataHub6%32%31criticized challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%06
Microsoft Purview4%21%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Microsoft Purview4%21%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%07
Databricks Unity Catalog2%40%20criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Databricks Unity Catalog2%40%20criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08Secoda2%36%11criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Secoda2%36%11criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
OpenMetadata2%44%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
OpenMetadata2%44%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Snowflake Horizon0%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Snowflake Horizon0%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
data.world0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
data.world0%40%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Atlan vs Microsoft PurviewAtlan vs OvalEdgeAtlan vs AlationAtlan vs Select StarOpenMetadata vs SecodaOpenMetadata vs DataHubOpenMetadata vs Microsoft PurviewOpenMetadata vs OvalEdgeOpenMetadata vs AlationOpenMetadata vs Select StarSecoda vs DataHubSecoda vs Microsoft PurviewSecoda vs OvalEdgeSecoda vs AlationSecoda vs Select StarDataHub vs Microsoft PurviewDataHub vs OvalEdgeDataHub vs AlationDataHub vs Select StarMicrosoft Purview vs OvalEdgeMicrosoft Purview vs AlationMicrosoft Purview vs Select StarOvalEdge vs AlationOvalEdge vs Select StarAlation vs Select Star
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Collibra38%
Collibra38%02Atlan23%
Atlan23%03Alation10%
Alation10%04Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud6%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud6%05DataHub6%
DataHub6%06Microsoft Purview4%
Microsoft Purview4%07Databricks Unity Catalog2%
Databricks Unity Catalog2%08Secoda2%
Secoda2%09OpenMetadata2%
OpenMetadata2%10Snowflake Horizon0%
Snowflake Horizon0%11data.world0%
data.world0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Collibra17%
12 of 72 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Platforms to Approach with Caution or Avoid ... Collibra: Extremely long and complex implementations ... low end-user adoption rates” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Alation16%
10 of 61 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Complex architecture (multi-layered infrastructure), slow innovation cycles, poor search relevance in some cases, and adoption hurdles” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Microsoft Purview21%
12 of 57 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid for new deployments—or plan a migration ... classic catalog, classic Data Health Insights, and classic Purview Workflow aren’t accepting new customers” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
Atlan13%
8 of 60 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“"Avoid": Traditional per-user models (Collibra, Alation, Atlan at list pricing)” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 903 links across 236 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 24 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Atlan45 answers · 103 citations · 12 models
vendor site · OvalEdge27 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ER/Studio23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Decube19 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Basedash16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · DQLabs14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Informatica13 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Microsoft13 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · GitHub13 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Alation12 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data catalog”, “data catalog”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collibra collibra.com | 38% | 180 | 6,600 | 277 | 10,491 | $48 | 41 | |
| Atlan atlan.com | 23% | 157 | 5,400 | 432 | 41,147 | 8 | 4 | |
| Alation alation.com | 10% | 141 | 4,400 | 482 | 53,500 | 0 | 2 | |
| Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud informatica.com | 6% | 366 | 390 | 1 | 73,321 | 120 | 9 | |
| DataHub datahub.com | 6% | 111 | 5,400 | 275 | 7,220 | 79 | 8 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Purview 4% | 4% | 514 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Databricks databricks.com Databricks Unity Catalog 2% | 2% | 53 | 135,000 | 8,368 | 689,756 company | $34,664 | 120 | 1 |
| Metaphor | 2% | |||||||
| Alex Solutions alexsolutions.com | 2% | 1 | ||||||
| Collibra Platform | 2% |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (alation.com, atlan.com, github.com, informatica.com). The first result for “best data catalog” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best data catalog for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data governance platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade data catalogs and governance platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data catalog for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a data catalog. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data catalogs and governance platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Atlan, CollibraCollibraChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Ab Initio, Atlan, Collibra, IBM Data Governance, data.world
Two alternatives
Alation, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTwo alternatives
Atlan, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudOne alternative
CollibraGPT-5.4 miniAtlan, CollibraCollibraChangedCollibraCollibraagainst: AWS Glue Data Catalog, Microsoft Purviewno first choiceagainst: Collibra, Microsoft Purview Data Governance, ServiceNow Data Catalog
One alternative
AlationTwo alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewTen alternatives
Alation, Ataccama ONE, Atlan, BigID, DataGalaxy, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OvalEdge, ServiceNowOne alternative
AlationGemini 3.5 FlashAtlanagainst: Databricks Unity Catalog, Snowflake HorizonCollibraChangedCollibraDataHub, OpenMetadataagainst: Alation, Collibrano first choiceagainst: AWS Glue Data Catalog, Apache Atlas, Databricks Unity Catalog, Google Cloud Dataplex, IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, Legacy SAP Information Steward / Enterprise Metadata Management, Lyft Amundsen / LinkedIn DataHub, Microsoft Purview, Oracle Enterprise Metadata Management
Three alternatives
Alation, Collibra, DataHubFour alternatives
Alation, Atlan, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewFive alternatives
Alation, Atlan, IBM Knowledge Catalog, Informatica Cloud Data Governance & Catalog, Microsoft PurviewFive alternatives
Acryl Data, Atlan, Databricks Unity Catalog, Microsoft Purview, Snowflake HorizonPerplexity SonarAlationCollibraChangedCollibraCollibraagainst: Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadatano first choiceagainst: AWS Glue Data Catalog, Alation, BigID, Collibra, Databricks Unity Catalog, IBM Knowledge Catalog, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, Snowflake Horizon, watsonx.data intelligence
Two alternatives
Atlan, CollibraFour alternatives
Atlan, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OneTrustTen alternatives
Alation, Atlan, BigID, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Securiti, Snowflake HorizonTwo alternatives
Atlan, DataHub CloudGrok 4.20Atlanagainst: DataHub, OpenMetadataCollibraChangedagainst: Atlan, Databricks Unity CatalogCollibraagainst: Amundsen, Apache Atlas, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Snowflake HorizonMicrosoft Purviewagainst: Atlan, Collate, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OpenMetadata, data.worldAlation, Collibraagainst: Amazon DataZone, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Google Cloud Dataplex, OpenMetadata, Secoda, Select Star, Snowflake Horizonagainst: Alation, Amundsen, Collibra, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OpenMetadata, Oracle
Four alternatives
Alation, Collibra, Informatica Cloud Data Governance & Catalog, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewFour alternatives
Alation, Atlan, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Alation, CollibraThree alternatives
Atlan, Microsoft Purview, data.worldMistral SmallCollibraCollibraHeldCollibraAlation, Collibraagainst: DataHub, OpenMetadatano first choiceagainst: DataHubagainst: Alation, Atlan, Collibra, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Snowflake Horizon, Unity Catalog for Databricks
Two alternatives
Alation, AtlanThree alternatives
Atlan, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewThree alternatives
Alation, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OvalEdgeThree alternatives
Atlan, Microsoft Purview, OvalEdgeDeepSeek V4 FlashAtlanCollibraChangedCollibraMicrosoft Purviewagainst: Alation, Atlan, Collate, DataHub, Dawiso, Informatica CDGCno first choiceagainst: Actian Zeenea, Alation, Apache Atlas, Castor, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Secoda, Select Star, data.world
Three alternatives
Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTwo alternatives
Atlan, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudFive alternatives
Alation, Atlan, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewOne alternative
CollibraLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldCollibraAtlan, Collibrano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Alation, Atlan, CloudEagle.ai, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudTwo alternatives
DataHub, Microsoft PurviewQwen 3.7 FlashCollibraCollibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudChangedAlation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudOpen Metadataagainst: Alation, Collibra, ImmutaAlationagainst: Amundsen, Apache Atlas, Collibra, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OpenText, Secoda
Three alternatives
Alation, Atlan, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Atlan, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Atlan, IBM watsonx.governanceTwo alternatives
Atlan, Microsoft PurviewFour alternatives
Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, TIBCO SpotfireKimi K2Alation, AtlanCollibraChangedno first choiceDataHubagainst: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudAtlan, Metaphor, Secodaagainst: Collibra, Databricks Unity, Informatica MDM, Snowflake Polaris
Three alternatives
Collibra, Informatica Cloud Data Governance & Catalog, Microsoft PurviewThree alternatives
Alation, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewSix alternatives
Alation, Atlan, Collibra, Databricks Unity Catalog, Informatica Cloud Data Governance & Catalog, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Atlan, Microsoft PurviewFive alternatives
Alation, Apache Polaris, Collibra, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudGLM 4.7 FlashXAtlanagainst: IBM Knowledge Catalog, Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, OpenMetadataInformatica Intelligent Data Management CloudChangedAtlan, CollibraAtlanagainst: Microsoft Purviewno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Purview
Three alternatives
Alation, Collibra, Microsoft PurviewThree alternatives
Collibra, IBM, Microsoft PurviewSeven alternatives
Alation, DataHub, IBM Knowledge Catalog, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, SecodaTwo alternatives
Alation, CollibraMiniMax M2.5AtlanInformatica Intelligent Data Management CloudChangedCollibraAlex Solutionsagainst: Alation, Atlan, Decube, Microsoft Purviewno first choiceagainst: Amazon AWS Glue Data Catalog
Two alternatives
Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudFour alternatives
Alation, Collibra, Databricks Unity Catalog, Microsoft PurviewFive alternatives
Alation, Databricks Unity Catalog, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, Snowflake HorizonOne alternative
CollibraGPT-6 LunaAtlanCollibraChangedAlation, CollibraDataHubagainst: Atlan, Microsoft Purviewno first choiceagainst: AWS Glue Data Catalog, Collibra Data Governance Center, Databricks Unity Catalog, Microsoft Purview, Snowflake Horizon, data.world Open Data Community
Two alternatives
Collibra, Microsoft PurviewThree alternatives
Alation, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewFour alternatives
Atlan, IBM watsonx.data intelligence, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewMuse Glimmer 30BCollibraCollibra PlatformChangedCollibraDatabricks Unity Catalogno first choiceagainst: Alation, Atlan, Collibra, DataHub, Google Cloud Data Catalog, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, Secoda, Select Star, Zeenea, data.world
Four alternatives
Alation, Atlan, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PurviewSeven alternatives
Alation, Atlan, DataHub, IBM watsonx.data intelligence, Informatica Cloud Data Governance and Catalog / IDMC, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadataThree alternatives
Aiven DataHub, Alex, MetaKartaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:09 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 18 | 147 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:41 | yes | 15 | 69 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:08 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:42 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:00 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:59 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:30 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 7 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:00 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 19 | 71 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 15 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:45 | yes | 24 | 99 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:58 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:00 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:12 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:04 | yes | 21 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:29 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:34 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 20 | 98 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:46 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:36 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 20 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:39 | yes | 25 | 175 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:09 | no | 0 | 85 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 6 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Glue read as AWS Glue Data Catalog
Ataccama read as Ataccama ONE
Google Dataplex read as Google Cloud Dataplex
IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog read as IBM Knowledge Catalog
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (Cloud Data Governance & Catalog - CDGC) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (Informatica Axon Data Governance) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (Salesforce) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Microsoft Purview Data Catalog (classic) read as Microsoft Purview
Snowflake read as Snowflake Horizon
Snowflake Horizon Catalog read as Snowflake Horizon
Unresolved, counted raw
Actian Zeenea
Aiven DataHub
Amazon AWS Glue Data Catalog
Amazon DataZone
Apache Polaris
Castor Doc
Collibra Data Catalog & Governance
Collibra Platform
DataHub Cloud
Databricks Unity
IBM Data Governance
IBM Information Governance
Informatica Cloud Data Governance and Catalog / IDMC
Legacy SAP Information Steward / Enterprise Metadata Management
Lyft Amundsen / LinkedIn DataHub
MetaKarta
Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Open Metadata
Orchestry Software
Quest Data Intelligence (erwin)
Snowflake Data Catalog
Snowflake Polaris
Unity Catalog for Databricks
Veeam Data Cloud Vault
data.world Open Data Community
watsonx.data intelligence
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.