AI governance platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “AI governance platform”, and as “tool to govern AI models and AI use cases”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · IBM watsonx.governance 29%
29Credo AI29IBM watsonx.governance11OneTrust AI Governance31others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+7Since October 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.IBM watsonx.governance held the lead, +7 points on 22%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Strac43%Clear leader▲+12Since October 2026: 31% → 43%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-market
Credo AI19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseIBM watsonx.governance29%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Strac43%Clear leader▲+12Since October 2026: 31% → 43%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketCredo AI19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseIBM watsonx.governance29%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01IBM watsonx.governance29%10%62accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 29%
02Credo AI29%19%52accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 20% → 29%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 29%
Credo AI29%19%52accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 20% → 29%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 29%03
OneTrust AI Governance11%15%52accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%
OneTrust AI Governance11%15%52accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%04
Microsoft Purview7%16%38accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 7%
Microsoft Purview7%16%38accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 7%05Pillar Security7%7%15accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
06
ServiceNow AI Control Tower2%27%15criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
ServiceNow AI Control Tower2%27%15criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
ModelOp Center0%21%24accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 14% → 0%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.14% → 0%
ModelOp Center0%21%24accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 14% → 0%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.14% → 0%09
Holistic AI0%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Holistic AI0%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Fiddler AI0%12%25accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Fiddler AI0%12%25accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
BigID0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BigID0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Securiti AI Governance0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Securiti AI Governance0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Credo AI vs VantaCredo AI vs Holistic AICredo AI vs Fiddler AICredo AI vs IBM watsonx.governancedope.security vs Stracdope.security vs Microsoft Purviewdope.security vs Vantadope.security vs Holistic AIdope.security vs Fiddler AIdope.security vs IBM watsonx.governanceStrac vs Microsoft PurviewStrac vs VantaStrac vs Holistic AIStrac vs Fiddler AIStrac vs IBM watsonx.governanceMicrosoft Purview vs VantaMicrosoft Purview vs Holistic AIMicrosoft Purview vs Fiddler AIMicrosoft Purview vs IBM watsonx.governanceVanta vs Holistic AIVanta vs Fiddler AIVanta vs IBM watsonx.governanceHolistic AI vs Fiddler AIHolistic AI vs IBM watsonx.governanceFiddler AI vs IBM watsonx.governance
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
I01
020304P05
060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01IBM watsonx.governance29%
02Credo AI29%
Credo AI29%03OneTrust AI Governance11%
OneTrust AI Governance11%04Microsoft Purview7%
Microsoft Purview7%05Pillar Security7%
06ServiceNow AI Control Tower2%
ServiceNow AI Control Tower2%07Fiddler AI0%
Fiddler AI0%08Securiti AI Governance0%
Securiti AI Governance0%09Holistic AI0%
Holistic AI0%10ModelOp Center0%
ModelOp Center0%11BigID0%
BigID0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneTrust AI Governance15%
8 of 52 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“avoid legacy giants like IBM, ServiceNow, or OneTrust” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Credo AI19%
10 of 52 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Credo AI operates at the organizational policy layer without code execution instrumentation. That is the caution raised for teams needing runtime monitoring” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
IBM watsonx.governance
10%
6 of 62 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“"avoid legacy giants like IBM, ServiceNow, or OneTrust" for limited innovation or over-reliance on existing stacks” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Microsoft Purview16%
6 of 38 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“notably high "negative rate" (25%) among enterprise AI models, indicating significant concerns or dissatisfaction” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 920 links across 284 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 50 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Superblocks40 answers · 52 citations · 12 models
vendor site · IBM24 answers · 48 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 12 models
vendor site · BigID20 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
16 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · UpGuard13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Microsoft11 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
35 answers · 12 models
23 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “ai governance platform”, “ai governance platforms”, “best ai governance platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM parent site IBM watsonx.governance 29% | 29% | 141 | 201,000 | 34,098 | |||
| Credo AI credo.ai | 29% | 156 | 2,400 | 59 | 9,753 | 5 | |
| OneTrust onetrust.com OneTrust AI Governance 11% | 11% | 122 | 14,800 | 624 | 54,294 company | 58 | 2 |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Purview 7% | 7% | 514 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Pillar Security pillar.security | 7% | 21 | |||||
| ServiceNow parent site ServiceNow AI Control Tower 2% | 2% | 27 | 135,000 | 13,451 | |||
| Asenion | 2% | ||||||
| Databricks Unity Gateway / Unity Catalog | 2% | ||||||
| Nexos.ai nexos.ai | 2% | 3 | |||||
| OptScale AI optscale.ai | 2% | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, ibm.com). The first result for “ai governance platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best AI governance platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to govern AI models and AI use cases would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade AI governance platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best AI governance platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an AI governance platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AI governance platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldCredo AIIBM watsonx.governance, Nexos.aiagainst: Credo AI, DataRobot, OneTrust AI Governanceno first choiceagainst: Azure AI Content Safety, IBM watsonx.governance
Three alternatives
Fiddler AI, IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI GovernanceGPT-5.4 miniCredo AIIBM watsonx.governanceChangedno first choiceDatabricks Unity Gateway / Unity Catalogno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
DataRobot, Dataiku, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Databricks Unity Catalog, MicrosoftSix alternatives
Collibra AI Command Center / AI Governance, DataRobot AI Governance, Databricks Unity Catalog, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Foundry Control Plane / Azure AI governance, OneTrust AI GovernanceOne alternative
IBM watsonx.governanceGemini 3.5 FlashCredo AICredo AIHeldCredo AICredo AIno first choicenothing named
Seven alternatives
Databricks Unity Catalog, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp Center, Monitaur, OneTrust AI Governance, Pillar Security, Snowflake HorizonFour alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governance, Securiti AI Governance, ServiceNow AI GovernanceSeven alternatives
Fiddler AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, Monitaur, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control TowerFive alternatives
AWS SageMaker Governance, Azure AI Studio, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, ServiceNow AI GovernancePerplexity SonarCredo AICredo AIHeldCredo AIIBM watsonx.governanceagainst: Credo AI, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control Towerno first choiceagainst: AWS SageMaker Governance, Arize AX, Credo AI, Fiddler AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Responsible AI Dashboard, ModelOp Center, Modulos, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control Tower
Three alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceEleven alternatives
Arize AI, Fiddler AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Lakera, Microsoft Purview, ModelOp Center, Netskope, NeuralTrust, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control Tower, ZscalerEleven alternatives
Arthur, Collibra AI Governance, DataRobot, Dataiku, Fiddler AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control TowerGrok 4.20Pillar Security, TrustibleIBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft PurviewChangedagainst: Bifrost, KongCredo AI, IBM watsonx.governanceOneTrust AI Governanceagainst: Arthur, BigID, Credo AI, Holistic AI, WhyLabsno first choiceagainst: AWS SageMaker Clarify, Credo AI, Google Cloud Vertex AI Risk Management, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Governance
Three alternatives
BigID, IBM watsonx.governance, Securiti AI GovernanceFour alternatives
Credo AI Governance Platform, Deeploy, Microsoft Agent 365 / Foundry, OneTrust AI GovernanceFive alternatives
Fiddler AI, Holistic AI, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, Securiti AI GovernanceThree alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, Kore.ai, ServiceNow AI Control TowerTen alternatives
BigID, Blue Border, DataRobot, Fiddler AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Island, Microsoft Purview, Netskope One, OneTrust AI Governance, UpGuard User RiskMistral SmallCredo AI, IBM watsonx.governanceMicrosoft PurviewChangedCredo AI, OneTrust AI Governanceagainst: ModelOp CenterIBM watsonx.governanceno first choiceagainst: Collibra, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI Governance
Three alternatives
OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control Tower, SuperblocksFour alternatives
Collibra Data Governance Center, Dataiku Governance, IBM Watsonx Governance, SAS Model ManagerTwo alternatives
Fiddler AI, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Credo AI, Pillar SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashCredo AICredo AIHeldBifrostOneTrust AI Governanceagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Stracno first choiceagainst: Amazon SageMaker, Anthropic, Credo AI, Fiddler AI, Google Cloud, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, OpenAI, ServiceNow AI Control Tower
Four alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governance, Openlayer, Pillar SecurityFive alternatives
Bifrost, Defender for AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceFive alternatives
Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview AI Governance, OneTrust AI Governance, Securiti AI GovernanceOne alternative
SaidotLlama 4 MaverickPillar Securityno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Collibra, Microsoft Purview
Five alternatives
BigID, Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceQwen 3.7 FlashPillar SecurityIBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft PurviewChangedCredo AIAsenionagainst: Arize AX, Pillar Securityno first choiceagainst: Archer, Collibra, LogicGate, Microsoft Purview, ServiceNow AI Control Tower
Four alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governance, Openlayer, Securiti AI GovernanceThree alternatives
Blue Border, OneTrust AI Governance, Securiti AI GovernanceSeven alternatives
Arize AI, BigID, Fiddler AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Foundry, OneTrust AI GovernanceTwo alternatives
Bifrost, Microsoft PurviewKimi K2IBM watsonx.governanceServiceNow AI Control TowerChangedagainst: Amazon SageMakerIBM watsonx.governanceGovarnaagainst: Credo AI, Fiddler AI, Holistic AI, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governanceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI GovernanceSix alternatives
Credo AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, Pillar SecurityFive alternatives
AWS AI Governance, Collibra AI Governance, Credo AI, Fiddler AI, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Domino Data Lab, IBM watsonx.governanceGLM 4.7 FlashXCredo AIIBM watsonx.governanceChangedCredo AICredo AIno first choiceagainst: UpGuard User Risk
Four alternatives
Aurascape, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI GovernanceFour alternatives
Credo AI, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control TowerEight alternatives
BigID, Collibra AI Governance, Fiddler AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI GovernanceTwo alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft PurviewMiniMax M2.5IBM watsonx.governanceIBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI GovernanceChangedCredo AIOptScale AIagainst: Govarnano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Governance, TruyoThree alternatives
Fiddler.ai, Holistic AI, Securiti AI GovernanceFive alternatives
BigID, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Govern365, VDF.AIGPT-6 LunaOneTrust AI GovernanceOneTrust AI GovernanceHeldagainst: Microsoft Purviewno first choiceOrgLogicno first choiceagainst: Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Purview
Three alternatives
Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp CenterTwo alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, ServiceNow AI Control TowerSix alternatives
Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Foundry Control Plane + Purview, Entra, and Defender, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control TowerOne alternative
Microsoft 365 CopilotMuse Glimmer 30BCredo AI, IBM watsonx.governanceagainst: Databricks Lakehouse Platform / Unity Catalog, MLflow, Lakehouse MonitoringCredo AIChangedno first choiceIBM watsonx.governanceagainst: Collibra, Credo AI, OneTrust AI Governanceno first choiceagainst: Amazon SageMaker, Credo AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Superblocks
Four alternatives
BigID, Fiddler AI, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceThree alternatives
IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceFive alternatives
BigID, Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceOne alternative
SmartSuiteBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:53 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:00 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:39 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:40 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:47 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:31 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:36 | yes | 15 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:03 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 25 | 15 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:13 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 20 | 73 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 6 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:00 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:43 | yes | 25 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:59 | yes | 18 | 57 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 22 | 146 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 22 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:06 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:34 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:14 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:15 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:59 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 15 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:10 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:41 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:37 | yes | 6 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:19 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:56 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 23 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:11 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Arize read as Arize AX
Fiddler read as Fiddler AI
Microsoft Purview AI Hub read as Microsoft Purview
ModelOp read as ModelOp Center
ModelOp (ModelOp Center) read as ModelOp Center
OneTrust read as OneTrust AI Governance
OneTrust (AI Governance) read as OneTrust AI Governance
OneTrust AI-Ready Governance Platform read as OneTrust AI Governance
Securiti read as Securiti AI Governance
Securiti AI read as Securiti AI Governance
Securiti.ai read as Securiti AI Governance
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow AI Control Tower
ServiceNow (AI Governance / AI Control Tower) read as ServiceNow AI Control Tower
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS AI Governance
AWS's AI/ML governance tools
Asenion (formerly Fairly AI)
BRI.AI
Calypso
Collibra AI Command Center / AI Governance
CortX
Credo AI Governance Platform
DataRobot AI Governance
Databricks Lakehouse Platform / Unity Catalog, MLflow, Lakehouse Monitoring
Databricks Unity Gateway / Unity Catalog
Dataiku Governance
Defender for AI
Entra ID for AI agents
Fiddler.ai
Glean Protect
Google Cloud AI Governance
Google Cloud Vertex AI Risk Management
Google Cloud's Vertex AI Governance
Google Vertex AI governance features
Governed
IBM Watsonx Governance
Iterative
Lemonade AI
Microsoft Agent 365 / Foundry
Microsoft Foundry Control Plane + Purview, Entra, and Defender
Microsoft Foundry Control Plane / Azure AI governance
Microsoft Purview AI Governance
Mona
OptScale AI
Oracle AI Registry / AI Data Platform
OrgLogic
Pritect
SAS Model Manager
SmartSuite AI Governance Software
Tremirre
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.