Static application security testing for enterprise buyers
Asked as “SAST tool”, and as “static code security scanner”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53Checkmarx One12SonarQube12Veracode Static Analysis22others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−1Since October 2026: 54% → 53%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Checkmarx One held the lead, −1 point on 54%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessSemgrep AppSec Platform82%Clear leader▲+29Since October 2026: 53% → 82%, +29 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketSemgrep AppSec Platform71%Clear leader▲+35Since October 2026: 36% → 71%, +35 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Checkmarx One53%Clear leader▼−1Since October 2026: 54% → 53%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Checkmarx One53%Clear leader▼−1Since October 2026: 54% → 53%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Checkmarx One53%21%75endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 54% → 53%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.54% → 53%
Checkmarx One53%21%75endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 54% → 53%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.54% → 53%02
Veracode Static Analysis12%17%65accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 13% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 12%
Veracode Static Analysis12%17%65accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 13% → 12%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 12%03SonarQube12%22%65accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 12%
04Semgrep AppSec Platform8%28%54criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%
05
Snyk Code2%20%35accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Snyk Code2%20%35accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%06
GitHub Advanced Security2%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
GitHub Advanced Security2%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10CodeQL0%30%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
07
OpenText Fortify0%21%52accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OpenText Fortify0%21%52accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Snyk0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Snyk0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Black Duck Coverity0%6%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Black Duck Coverity0%6%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Semgrep AppSec Platform vs SonarQubeSemgrep AppSec Platform vs Aikido SecuritySemgrep AppSec Platform vs Snyk Code
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
One product takes 53% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Checkmarx One21%
16 of 75 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Checkmarx pricing is opaque and typically starts at $100,000+/year... Avoid enterprise solutions with opaque pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
SonarQube
22%
14 of 65 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid open-source SAST tools without enterprise support (e.g., Semgrep, SonarQube) for mission-critical use” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Semgrep AppSec Platform
28%
15 of 54 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid open-source SAST tools without enterprise support (e.g., Semgrep, SonarQube) for mission-critical use” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Veracode Static Analysis17%
11 of 65 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Tools to avoid for predictable enterprise pricing ... Costs balloon with scanning frequency; add-ons for every feature” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 804 links across 183 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 42 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
40 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Safeguard33 answers · 58 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Checkmarx32 answers · 60 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Aikido28 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Augment Code17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Offensive36016 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Corgea16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
publisher (Gane)13 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sast tool”, “sast tool”, “sast tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checkmarx checkmarx.com Checkmarx One 53% | 53% | 159 | 260 | 3 | 54,982 company | 61 | 8 | |
| Veracode Static Analysis veracode.com | 12% | 100 | 40 | 2 | 12,543 | 17 | ||
| SonarQube | 12% | 14,800 | 1,353 | |||||
| Semgrep AppSec Platform semgrep.dev | 8% | 167 | 3,461 | 43 | ||||
| GitLab parent site GitLab SAST 4% | 4% | 24 | 90,500 | 4,844 | ||||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Code 2%, Snyk 0% | 2% | 150 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| GitHub parent site GitHub Advanced Security 2%, GitHub Code Security 0% | 2% | 78 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | ||||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| Offensive360 offensive360.com Offensive360 SAST 2%, Offensive360 0% | 2% | 4 | ||||||
| SonarQube Enterprise or Data Center Edition | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, safeguard.sh). The first result for “best sast tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SAST tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which static code security scanner would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SAST tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SAST tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SAST tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SAST tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Checkmarx OneSonarQubeChangedCheckmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: GitLab SASTGitHub Advanced Securityagainst: Checkmarx One, Codacyno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, Codacy, Fortify from OpenText, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code
Four alternatives
Black Duck, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Snyk, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, SnykGPT-5.4 miniCheckmarx OneVeracode Static AnalysisChangedCheckmarx OneSonarQubeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
HCL AppScan, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk CodeFour alternatives
Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeSix alternatives
CodeQL, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
Checkmarx OneGemini 3.5 FlashSemgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk CodeCheckmarx OneChangedCheckmarx One, OpenText FortifySonarQubeagainst: GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Codeno first choiceagainst: Bandit, Brakeman, ESLint, SonarQube, gosec
Four alternatives
Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security, SonarQube Enterprise Edition, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk Code, SonarQubeFive alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static AnalysisPerplexity SonarCheckmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldCheckmarx OneCheckmarx Oneno first choiceagainst: Bandit, Brakeman, Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube
Five alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
CodeQL, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Veracode Static AnalysisSeven alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, CodeQL, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
OpenText FortifyGrok 4.20Checkmarx One, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: Semgrep AppSec PlatformCheckmarx OneChangedCheckmarx One, Veracode Static Analysisagainst: Bandit, ESLint, Mend SASTVeracode Static Analysisagainst: Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk, SonarQubeno first choiceagainst: Bandit, Bearer, Checkmarx One, CodeQL, DevSkim, Dlint, FindBugs, Pysa/Facebook Infer, SonarQube, SpotBugs, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, SonarQubeFive alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisSix alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQubeTwo alternatives
Offensive360, OpenText FortifyMistral SmallCheckmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldagainst: Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk CodeCheckmarx OneGitLab SAST, SonarQubeagainst: Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Codeno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisNine alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab SAST, HCL AppScan, Mend SAST, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisDeepSeek V4 FlashCheckmarx One, Semgrep AppSec Platformagainst: OpenText FortifyCheckmarx OneChangedagainst: SonarQubeCheckmarx OneGitLab SASTagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceagainst: SonarQubeagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, Veracode Static AnalysisSeven alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, Perforce Klocwork, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
Offensive360Llama 4 MaverickCheckmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldno first choiceCheckmarx Oneno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisQwen 3.7 FlashSonarQubeagainst: OpenText FortifyCheckmarx OneChangedBlack Duck Coverityagainst: Mend SAST, OpenText FortifyCheckmarx Oneno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
Checkmarx One, Snyk, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Checkmarx One, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisKimi K2Checkmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldCheckmarx Oneagainst: Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeSonarQube Enterprise or Data Center Editionagainst: Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, Graudit, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Four alternatives
Black Duck, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFive alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisFour alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify, Perforce Klocwork, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, Offensive360GLM 4.7 FlashXCheckmarx OneCheckmarx OneHeldCheckmarx OneAikido Securityagainst: Checkmarx One, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx One, Ghost Security, Old Fortify, SonarQube
Four alternatives
GitHub Code Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisThree alternatives
OpenText Fortify, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisNine alternatives
Aikido Security, Black Duck Coverity, CodeQL, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis, ZeroPathTwo alternatives
Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQubeMiniMax M2.5Checkmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisCheckmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisHeldCheckmarx OneCheckmarx Oneno first choiceagainst: Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static Analysis
Three alternatives
OpenText Fortify, Snyk Code, SonarQubeThree alternatives
OpenText Fortify, Snyk Code, SonarQubeSeven alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, HCL AppScan, OpenText Fortify, Perforce Klocwork, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisGPT-6 LunaSemgrep AppSec PlatformSemgrep AppSec PlatformHeldno first choiceSonarQubeagainst: GitHub Code Securityno first choiceagainst: CodeQL, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube
Three alternatives
Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security, Veracode Static AnalysisTwo alternatives
Checkmarx One, GitHub Code SecurityEight alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, Checkmarx One, GitHub Advanced Security, OpenText Fortify, Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
Semgrep AppSec PlatformMuse Glimmer 30BCheckmarx One, Veracode Static AnalysisCheckmarx OneChangedCheckmarx Oneagainst: CodeQL, Snyk CodeOffensive360 SASTagainst: Checkmarx One, Snyk, Veracode Static Analysisno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx CxSAST, SonarQube, Veracode Static Analysis
Five alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, Mend SAST, OpenText Fortify, Perforce Klocwork, SnykTwo alternatives
OpenText Fortify, Veracode Static AnalysisSix alternatives
Black Duck Coverity, OpenText Fortify SCA / Fortify on Demand, Perforce Klocwork, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube, Veracode Static AnalysisOne alternative
SonarQubeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:46 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:33 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:38 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:12 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 14 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:43 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:36 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:53 | no | 0 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:34 | yes | 25 | 79 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:50 | yes | 7 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:30 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 17 | 69 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 14 | 109 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:38 | yes | 14 | 62 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:06 | yes | 13 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:33 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:13 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 25 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 5 | 89 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:58 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:49 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:34 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:34 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:23 | yes | 22 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:47 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:19 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:12 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:01 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:58 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:04 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 24 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 23 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:42 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One
Checkmarx (Checkmarx One / CxSAST) read as Checkmarx One
Checkmarx (CxOne) read as Checkmarx One
Checkmarx (CxSAST / Checkmarx One) read as Checkmarx One
GitHub read as GitHub Advanced Security
GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL read as GitHub Advanced Security
GitHub Code Security / CodeQL read as GitHub Advanced Security
GitLab read as GitLab SAST
GitLab (with built-in SAST) read as GitLab SAST
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab SAST
Mend (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend SAST
Mend.io read as Mend SAST
Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) read as Mend SAST
Semgrep read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep (Community Rules) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep (Enterprise) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep (Semgrep Code) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep (Semgrep Pro/Enterprise) read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Code read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Community Edition read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Enterprise read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep OSS read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Semgrep Teams read as Semgrep AppSec Platform
Veracode read as Veracode Static Analysis
Unresolved, counted raw
DevSkim
Dlint
Fortify from OpenText
Ghost Security
IBM Security AppScan
Offensive360 SAST
Old Fortify (Micro Focus / OpenText)
OpenText Fortify SCA / Fortify on Demand
Pysa/Facebook Infer
SonarQube Enterprise Edition
SonarQube Enterprise or Data Center Edition
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.