Source control hosting for enterprise buyers
Asked as “source control hosting platform”, and as “Git hosting service”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
68%
Clear leader
68GitHub20GitLab06Azure DevOps06others
68% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+14Since October 2026: 54% → 68%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.GitHub held the lead, +14 points on 54%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
GitHub86%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 72% → 86%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub78%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 70% → 78%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseGitHub68%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 54% → 68%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page
GitHub86%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 72% → 86%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub78%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 70% → 78%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseGitHub68%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 54% → 68%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01GitHub68%24%93endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 54% → 68%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.54% → 68%
GitHub68%24%93endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 54% → 68%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.54% → 68%02
GitLab20%17%88accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 30% → 20%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.30% → 20%
GitLab20%17%88accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 30% → 20%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.30% → 20%03
Azure DevOps6%14%57accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
Azure DevOps6%14%57accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%04
Bitbucket2%38%71criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Bitbucket2%38%71criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%05
Gitea2%55%11criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Gitea2%55%11criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07
AWS CodeCommit0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
AWS CodeCommit0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
Azure Repos0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Azure Repos0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
One product takes 68% of first choices here, so the chart would put six markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Bitbucket38%
27 of 71 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Bitbucket has faced criticism for vulnerabilities and security flaws that have prompted some teams to move to more secure alternatives.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
GitHub24%
22 of 93 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid cloud GitHub/GitLab at this scale unless negotiating massive custom caps—their usage fees (Actions, compute) make totals unpredictable” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
GitLab17%
15 of 88 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid using the public cloud tier (Premium/Business) without enterprise negotiation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Gitea55%
6 of 11 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Gitea | Critical RCE vulnerabilities | CVE-2026-60004 (CVSS 9.8)” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 866 links across 248 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 56 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
publisher (Gane)34 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GitHub32 answers · 53 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G231 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GitHub24 answers · 60 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GitLab22 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Microsoft15 answers · 32 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Atlassian15 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GitLab12 answers · 22 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Microsoft12 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub github.com | 68% | 216 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | 42,019,137 | $81 | 14 | |
| GitLab gitlab.com | 20% | 196 | 90,500 | 4,844 | 603,028 | $884 | 66 | 4 |
| Azure parent site Azure DevOps 6%, Azure Repos 0% | 6% | 162 | 301,000 | 47,904 | ||||
| Bitbucket bitbucket.org | 2% | 181 | 33,100 | 1,560 | 22,601 | |||
| GitHub Enterprise Cloud or GitHub Enterprise Server | 2% | |||||||
| Gitea gitea.com Gitea 2%, Gitea/Forgejo 0% | 2% | 62 | 9,900 | 193 | 7,814 | |||
| Perforce Helix Core perforce.com | 0% | 13 | 260 | 11 | 161,450 | $2,860 | 100 | |
| IBM parent site IBM DevOps Code ClearCase 0% | 0% | 2 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| Atlassian Bitbucket Cloud | 0% | |||||||
| Atlassian atlassian.com Atlassian Bitbucket Data Center 0% | 0% | 1 | 4,724,388 company | $5,906 | 61 | 6 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (about.gitlab.com, atlassian.com). The first result for “best source control hosting platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best source control hosting platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Git hosting service would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade source control hosting platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best source control hosting platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a source control hosting platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which source control hosting platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHubGitHub Enterprise Cloud or GitHub Enterprise ServerChangedGitHubGitLab, Giteaagainst: GitHubno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabSix alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, Gitea, Perforce Helix Core, RhodeCodeGPT-5.4 miniGitHubagainst: BitbucketGitHubHeldGitHubGitLabagainst: GitHubGitHubagainst: GitHub
One alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Atlassian Bitbucket Cloud, GitLabGemini 3.5 FlashGitHubGitHubHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHubagainst: AWS CodeCommitAzure DevOpsno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, CVS, Gitea, Gitolite, Gogs, SourceForge, SourceHut, Unmanaged Subversion / SVN, Visual SourceSafe
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, Perforce Helix CoreThree alternatives
Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLabPerplexity SonarGitHubGitHubHeldGitHub, GitLabGitHubagainst: GitLabno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Codeberg, Forgejo, GitHub, Gitea, SourceHut
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Perforce Helix CoreTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket Data Center or CloudGrok 4.20GitHubagainst: Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, BitbucketGitHubHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHub, GitLabagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Gerrit, GiteaAzure DevOpsagainst: Bitbucket, GitHubGitHub, GitLabagainst: Assembla, Bitbucket, RhodeCodeagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
One alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Perforce Helix CoreOne alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure Repos, GiteaMistral SmallGitHubGitHub, GitLabChangedagainst: Azure DevOps, BitbucketGitHubGitHubagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, IBM DevOps Code ClearCase, Perforce Helix CoreDeepSeek V4 FlashGitHubGitLabChangedGitHub, GitLabGitLabagainst: Azure DevOps, GitHubno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, Forgejo, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, SourceForge
Four alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
GitHubThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Gitea/ForgejoOne alternative
GitHubLlama 4 MaverickGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Three alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabQwen 3.7 FlashGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubagainst: GitHub, GitLab CloudGitHubagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabKimi K2GitHub, GitLabGitHubChangedGitHubBitbucketagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLabno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, CodePlex, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, Gogs, Google Code Project Hosting, NeSCForge, SourceForge
One alternative
Azure DevOpsTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabGLM 4.7 FlashXGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitLabagainst: Bitbucketno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitHub.com Free Tier, GitLab
Three alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitHubMiniMax M2.5GitHubGitHub, GitLabChangedGitHub, GitLabGitLabagainst: GitHubno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
Azure DevOpsTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, BitbucketOne alternative
Azure DevOpsGPT-6 LunaGitHubagainst: BitbucketGitHubHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHubagainst: BitbucketGitHubagainst: Bitbucketno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure Repos, GitLabThree alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Azure Repos, GitLabOne alternative
GitLabMuse Glimmer 30BGitHubGitHubHeldGitHub, GitLabAzure DevOpsagainst: GitHub, GitLabno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Two alternatives
Azure Repos, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabFour alternatives
Atlassian Bitbucket Data Center, Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Perforce Helix CoreOne alternative
GitHubBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:30 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:27 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:16 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:08 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:49 | yes | 20 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:58 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:46 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:11 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:02 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 25 | 165 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:12 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:36 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 13 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:49 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:24 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:47 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:09 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:02 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:38 | yes | 6 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 15 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:08 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 24 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:23 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:03 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 24 | 74 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 15 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Atlassian read as Bitbucket
GitHub Enterprise Server read as GitHub
GitLab Self-Managed read as GitLab
GitLab Self-Managed (Community Edition or Enterprise) read as GitLab
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab
GitLab Ultimate (Self-Managed) read as GitLab
Unresolved, counted raw
Atlassian Bitbucket Cloud
Bitbucket Data Center or Cloud
CVS
GCP Source Repositories
GitHub Enterprise Cloud or GitHub Enterprise Server
GitHub.com Free Tier
GitLab Cloud
Google Code Project Hosting
NeSCForge
P4
Unmanaged Subversion / SVN
Visual SourceSafe
self-managed GitLab
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.