Workforce identity and SSO
Asked as “workforce identity platform”, and as “single sign-on and identity provider for employees”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Microsoft Entra ID27Okta Workforce Identity19JumpCloud08others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026=heldSince October 2026: 46% → 46%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Microsoft Entra ID held the lead, ±0 points on 46%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
JumpCloud55%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 48% → 55%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Microsoft Entra ID46%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 46% → 46%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID53%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 49% → 53%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
JumpCloud55%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 48% → 55%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Entra ID46%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 46% → 46%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID53%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 49% → 53%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Entra ID46%11%72endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 46% → 46%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.46% → 46%
Microsoft Entra ID46%11%72endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 46% → 46%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.46% → 46%02
Okta Workforce Identity27%26%73criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 23% → 27%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.23% → 27%
Okta Workforce Identity27%26%73criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 23% → 27%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.23% → 27%03JumpCloud19%4%49accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 9% → 19%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 19%
JumpCloud19%4%49accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 9% → 19%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 19%04
OneLogin5%7%41accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 20% → 5%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 5%
OneLogin5%7%41accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 20% → 5%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 5%05
Google Cloud Identity Lab in the set2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Google Cloud Identity Lab in the set2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07
Ping Identity0%31%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Ping Identity0%31%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%27%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%27%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
IBM Verify0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
IBM Verify0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
CyberArk Identity0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CyberArk Identity0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Cloud Identity is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to head
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Entra ID46%
Microsoft Entra ID46%02Okta Workforce Identity27%
Okta Workforce Identity27%03JumpCloud19%
JumpCloud19%04OneLogin5%
OneLogin5%05Google Cloud Identity2%
Google Cloud Identity2%06CyberArk Identity0%
CyberArk Identity0%07Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%08SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%09IBM Verify0%
IBM Verify0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Ping Identity31%
12 of 39 labels negative · 11 of 14 models
“Enterprise Platforms (e.g., Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping): Deep features, complex pricing, potentially heavy admin overhead.” Kimi K2, scale prompt
Okta Workforce Identity26%
19 of 73 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Okta without careful tenant hardening and incident-readiness. Its integration breadth is strong, but recent security concerns mean you should validate administrative controls” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Microsoft Entra ID11%
8 of 72 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Microsoft Entra ID when your estate is not Microsoft-centered. It can be excellent for Microsoft 365, but non-Microsoft integrations and the best value are less compelling outside that ecosystem.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud27%
4 of 15 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Do not buy SailPoint or Saviynt unless you have at least one senior Identity Engineer on staff.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 776 links across 203 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 49 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Corma34 answers · 55 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Okta22 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OneLogin21 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Microsoft15 answers · 30 citations · 7 models
vendor site · JumpCloud14 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SSOJet12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Ping Identity11 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 7 models
7 answers · 4 models
7 answers · 5 models
7 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 46% | 46% | 499 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Okta Workforce Identity okta.com | 27% | 202 | 390 | 8 | 1,959,740 | 118 | 2 | |
| JumpCloud jumpcloud.com | 19% | 365 | 12,100 | 244 | 108,479 | $8,612 | 80 | |
| OneLogin onelogin.com OneLogin 5%, OneLogin SSO 0% | 5% | 116 | 60,500 | 562 | 315,519 | 0 | ||
| Google Cloud google.dev Google Cloud Identity 2% | 2% | 53 | 165,000 | 7,596 | 881,346 | 109 | ||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Duo 2% | 2% | 189 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| CyberArk cyberark.com CyberArk Identity 0% | 0% | 54 | 22,200 | 1,253 | 147,793 company | $62 | 0 | |
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 0%, ForgeRock Identity Platform 0% | 0% | 264 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| SailPoint Identity Security Cloud sailpoint.com | 0% | 186 | 320 | 3 | 58,881 | 46 | ||
| IBM parent site IBM Verify 0% | 0% | 86 | 201,000 | 34,098 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forrester.com, okta.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best workforce identity platform” is thectoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce identity platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which single sign-on and identity provider for employees would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top workforce identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce identity platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a workforce identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce identity platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedagainst: Ping IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginTwo alternatives
Auth0, JumpCloudFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudFour alternatives
Keycloak, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping Identity PingONEGPT-5.4 miniOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Ping Identityno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginFive alternatives
Oracle Identity Governance, Ping Identity, PingOne for Workforce, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity CloudOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identityno first choiceagainst: SailPoint Identity Security Cloudagainst: BambooHR, CA SiteMinder, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, One Identity, OneLogin, Oracle Access Manager, Ping Identity, Rippling IT, Workday
Two alternatives
JumpCloud Open Directory Platform, Rippling ITTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
Authentik, Google Cloud Identity, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginFour alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Rippling ITPerplexity SonarOkta Workforce Identityagainst: Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: JumpCloud, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Three alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginSix alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDGrok 4.20Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedagainst: Google Workspace with Cloud IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, miniOrangeMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudOne alternative
JumpCloudThree alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping IdentityMistral SmallMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: CyberArk Identity, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginTwo alternatives
OneLogin, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, OneLoginChangedagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloudagainst: Active Directory, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ
Three alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginOne alternative
JumpCloudThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, WSO2 Identity PlatformTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginLlama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldno first choiceCisco Duono first choiceagainst: Auth0, Oracle Identity Governance, SailPoint IdentityIQ
Two alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginFour alternatives
LastPass, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Ping Identityagainst: Cisco Secure, Delinea, IBM Verify, Oracle Identity Governance, SAP, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
One alternative
OneLogin SSOTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginThree alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginKimi K2JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDJumpCloudChangedOkta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identityagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDGLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityHeldOkta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudno first choiceagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus
Two alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginFour alternatives
Corma, Keycloak, OneLogin, WorkOSEight alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudThree alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, WSO2 Identity PlatformMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityChangedagainst: Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloud, OneLoginno first choicenothing named
One alternative
JumpCloudTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, JumpCloud, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, miniOrangeGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldMicrosoft Entra IDGoogle Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, Google Cloud Identity, JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityMuse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Entra IDOneLoginChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Authentik, Azure AD Identity Protection, IBM ISAM, Keycloak, Microsoft Defender for Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle Identity Governance, Ping Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, Shibboleth, SimpleSAMLphp
Two alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, SSOJetBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:28 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 10 | 66 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:04 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:06 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:05 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 21 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:59 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:59 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:50 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 6 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:13 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 19 | 82 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 7 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:18 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:55 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:57 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:50 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 20 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 5 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:26 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:45 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:13 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:37 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:49 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:56 | no | 0 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 15 | 88 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:10 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:17 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:21 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:01 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 25 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:50 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:04 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 14 | 107 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:43 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
Google Workspace read as Google Cloud Identity
IBM read as IBM Verify
Microsoft read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra (formerly Azure AD) read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta (Workforce Identity Cloud) read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta Workforce read as Okta Workforce Identity
Oracle read as Oracle Identity Governance
Ping read as Ping Identity
Rippling read as Rippling IT
Rippling (IT Cloud / Identity) read as Rippling IT
SailPoint read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Saviynt read as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
CA SiteMinder (Broadcom)
Google Workspace-centric solutions
Hideez Workforce Identity
Jump Cloud
JumpCloud Open Directory Platform
Shibboleth
SimpleSAMLphp
Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.