November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Identity and access › Secrets · November 2026 Edition

Secrets management

Asked as “secrets management tool”, and as “secrets vault for applications and infrastructure”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Doppler 30%
32HashiCorp Vault30Doppler23Infisical15others

32% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 31% → 32%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.HashiCorp Vault held the lead, +1 point on 31%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01HashiCorp Vault32%21%81endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 31% → 32%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.31% → 32%
02Doppler30%8%59endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 29% → 30%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.29% → 30%
03Infisical23%2%46accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 15% → 23%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 23%
04AWS Secrets Manager6%14%69accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
05Azure Key Vault4%12%58accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%
06Akeyless2%6%34accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
07Google Secret Manager Lab in the set2%14%43accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Bitwarden Secrets Manager0%36%11criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
11CyberArk Conjur0%25%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
101Password0%14%22accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
09OpenBao0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08SOPS0%0%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Secret Manager is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
S08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01HashiCorp Vault32%
02Doppler30%
03Infisical23%
04AWS Secrets Manager6%
05Azure Key Vault4%
06Akeyless2%
07Google Secret Manager2%
08SOPS0%
09OpenBao0%
101Password0%
11CyberArk Conjur0%
12Bitwarden Secrets Manager0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
AWS Secrets Manager
14%
10 of 69 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Not recommended for small teams due to vendor lock-in and complexity.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
HashiCorp Vault
21%
17 of 81 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Often recommended to avoid unless you already have a dedicated platform/security team” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Azure Key Vault
12%
7 of 58 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“sensible for single-cloud deployments, but using each as a separate source of truth can create fragmentation and inconsistent policy across clouds” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Kubernetes Secrets
100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Kubernetes Secrets is a tool that should be used with caution or avoided due to its security limitations and management complexities” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 785 links across 194 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 45 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

39 answers · 52 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Akeyless33 answers · 50 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Infisical28 answers · 45 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OWASP16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GitHub14 answers · 31 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Microsoft11 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G211 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
vendor site · HashiCorp10 answers · 13 citations · 3 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best secrets management tool”, “secrets management tool”, “secrets management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
HashiCorp Vault hashicorp.com32%4005,400317173,934$26297
Doppler doppler.com30%15990,50011,8752,25512
Infisical infisical.com23%1774,400404,742143
AWS parent site
AWS Secrets Manager 6%, AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store 0%
6%195368,000114,001
Azure parent site
Azure Key Vault 4%
4%157301,00047,904
Akeyless akeyless.io2%1381,000163,357$916242
Google Secret Manager cloud.google.com2%1151,000467,405,347
Secret Manager2%
SOPS0%74,0008,602
OpenBao openbao.org0%461,600131,491

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akeyless.io, github.com, infisical.com). The first result for “best secrets management tool” is tigergate.dev.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best secrets management tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which secrets vault for applications and infrastructure would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top secrets management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best secrets management tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a secrets management tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which secrets management tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, HashiCorp Vault
against: CyberArk Secrets Manager
AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key VaultChanged
Three alternatives1Password, Dashlane, HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault
Four alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, CyberArk Secrets Manager, Infisical
against: Azure Key Vault
Doppler
Three alternativesBitwarden Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical
no first choiceagainst: Kubernetes Secrets
GPT-5.4 miniHashiCorp Vault
Two alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault
against: Akeyless, Doppler
HashiCorp VaultHeld
Two alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault
HashiCorp Vault
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager
Google Secret Manager
Two alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashDoppler, Infisical
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager
against: HashiCorp Vault
DopplerChanged
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical
HashiCorp Vault
Seven alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Infisical, OpenBao
Infisical
Six alternativesAWS Systems Manager Parameter Store, Azure Key Vault, Bitwarden Secrets Manager, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, SOPS
against: AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault
Three alternativesAkeyless, Doppler, Infisical
against: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Secrets Manager, Google Secret Manager
against: 1Password, HashiCorp Vault, KeePass, Kubernetes `Secret`, git-crypt, git-secret, pass
Perplexity SonarInfisical
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Doppler
against: HashiCorp Vault
DopplerChanged
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Infisical, OpenBao
against: HashiCorp Vault
Akeyless, HashiCorp Vault
Eight alternatives1Password, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Infisical, OpenBao
Infisical
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, Google Secret Manager
against: HashiCorp Vault
no first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Kubernetes Secrets
Grok 4.20HashiCorp Vault
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Passwork
against: CyberArk Secrets Manager
DopplerChanged
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical, OpenBao
HashiCorp Vault
Six alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Infisical
Infisical
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, SOPS
no first choice
Three alternativesAkeyless, Doppler, Infisical
against: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault
against: AWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Ansible Vault, Azure Key Vault, Bitwarden Secrets Manager, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Gopass, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical, KeePass, Sealed Secrets, pass
Mistral SmallHashiCorp Vault
Four alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur
HashiCorp VaultHeld
Three alternativesAkeyless, Doppler, Infisical
HashiCorp Vault
Seven alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur Secrets Manager, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Infisical, SOPS
HashiCorp Vault
Three alternativesAkeyless, Doppler, Infisical
no first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp Vault
DeepSeek V4 FlashDoppler, Infisical
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, HashiCorp Vault
Doppler, HashiCorp VaultChanged
One alternativeInfisical
HashiCorp Vault
Seven alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Infisical
Infisical
One alternativeHashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, Infisical
nothing named
Llama 4 MaverickDoppler
Two alternativesAkeyless, HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp VaultChangedno first choiceInfisical
Three alternativesDoppler, OpenBao, SOPS
no first choiceagainst: Kubernetes Secrets
Qwen 3.7 FlashHashiCorp Vault
Four alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Infisical
DopplerChanged
Four alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Bitwarden Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault
Six alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, SOPS, Sealed Secrets
Doppler, Infisical
One alternativeBitwarden Secrets Manager
against: AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault
no first choice
Four alternatives1Password, AWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, HashiCorp Vault
against: CyberArk Secrets Manager
against: HashiCorp Vault, Kubernetes Native Secrets
Kimi K2Doppler
Three alternatives1Password, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical
DopplerHeld
One alternativeHashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, Infisical
against: Doppler
Infisical
Two alternativesOpenBao, SOPS
against: AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault
Akeyless, HashiCorp Vault
Two alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault
against: 1Password, Bitwarden Secrets Manager, CyberArk Conjur, Delinea Secret Server, Doppler, Google Secret Manager
against: Ansible Vault, HashiCorp Vault, Keytar, dotenv / .env Files, kubernetes-external-secrets
GLM 4.7 FlashXHashiCorp Vault
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Infisical
against: CyberArk Conjur
AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key VaultChanged
One alternativeHashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault
Eight alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, Infisical, OpenBao, SOPS
against: 1Password, CyberArk Conjur
Doppler
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical
against: Bitwarden Secrets Manager, CyberArk Secrets Manager
HashiCorp Vault
Four alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, Keeper Secrets Manager
against: CyberArk Conjur
against: Ansible Vault, Bitwarden Secrets Manager, Passbolt, Puppet hiera-eyaml, aws-vault, kubernetes-external-secrets, pass
MiniMax M2.5HashiCorp Vault
Five alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, Doppler
DopplerChanged
Four alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical
HashiCorp Vault
Six alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, Doppler, Google Secret Manager
HashiCorp Vault, Infisical
Two alternativesAkeyless, Doppler
against: AWS Secrets Manager
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaDoppler
Two alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Infisical
against: HashiCorp Vault
AWS Secrets ManagerChanged
Three alternativesAzure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault
no first choice
Six alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Doppler, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Infisical
Secret Manager
Three alternativesInfisical, Parameter Store, Secrets Manager
no first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GitHub Actions Secrets, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Kubernetes Secrets, Terraform state
Muse Glimmer 30BDoppler
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp VaultChanged
Three alternativesAWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Doppler
Doppler, HashiCorp Vault
Seven alternatives1Password, AWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless Secrets Management, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, Google Secret Manager, Infisical
Infisical
Four alternativesAkeyless, Doppler, HashiCorp Vault Community / OpenBao, SOPS
no first choiceagainst: Kubernetes Secrets
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:36no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:37yes55 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:41yes1427 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:34yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:35yes512 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:32yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:10yes1918 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:57yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:53no025 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:43yes1524 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:21yes23162 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:22yes524 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:10yes419 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:48yes1318 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:58no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:01yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:26no017 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:49yes105 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:51yes1514 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:49yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:06yes2351 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:43yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:20no028 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:16yes1519 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:29yes2338 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:15yes523 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:49yes411 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:11yes1524 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:36yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:40yes67 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:38yes1124 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:23yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:35yes519 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:28yes59 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:44yes1823 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:36yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:20yes532 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:43yes1540 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:40yes2250 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:48yes517 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:12yes618 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:56yes1327 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:19yes169 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:24yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:20no017 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:48yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:36yes57 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:32yes56 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:56yes1518 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:31yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:36yes1544 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:27yes921 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:54no020 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:22yes2044 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:57yes312 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:43yes1418 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:45no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 19:33no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:00no020 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:40yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:31yes564 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:35no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:33yes2356 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:30yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:25no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:56yes1556 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:43yes1338 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:18yes1325 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:27yes215 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:11yes1325 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:55yes2012 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:13no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:57yes931 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:35yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:55yes1919 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:57yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 18:46yes2120 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:56yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:05yes2060 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:57yes2552 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:27yes2350 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:19no029 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:42yes515 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:20yes2131 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BeyondTrust read as BeyondTrust Password Safe
Bitwarden read as Bitwarden Secrets Manager
CyberArk read as CyberArk Secrets Manager
Delinea read as Delinea Secret Server
Thycotic read as Delinea Secret Server
Unresolved, counted raw
Age
Akeyless Secrets Management
Berglas
CyberArk Conjur Secrets Manager
ESO Enterprise Secrets Manager
External Secrets Operator - ESO
Google Cloud KMS
Gopass
HashiCorp Vault Community / OpenBao
Keytar (Node.js library)
Kubernetes `Secret`
Leapp
Puppet hiera-eyaml
Secrets Manager
Secrets Store CSI driver
Terraform state
aws-vault
dotenv / .env Files
external-secrets-operator
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← PAMWorkforce identity →