November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Identity and access › MFA › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Multi-factor authentication for small business buyers

Asked as “MFA solution”, and as “multi-factor authentication tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 67 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · Microsoft Entra ID 28%
37Cisco Duo28Microsoft Entra ID07Google Authenticator27others

37% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−3Since October 2026: 40% → 37%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Cisco Duo held the lead, −3 points on 40%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Cisco Duo37%4%71endorsed leader▼−3Since October 2026: 40% → 37%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.40% → 37%
02Microsoft Entra ID28%0%56accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 29% → 28%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.29% → 28%
03Google Workspace 2-Step Verification Lab in the set7%0%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 7% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 7%
04Google Authenticator Lab in the set7%24%34accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
05Microsoft Authenticator6%5%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
06JumpCloud Protect1%0%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 1% → 1%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 1%
07Okta Verify1%32%37criticized challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 7% → 1%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 1%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Auth00%17%24accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 0%
08YubiKey0%10%29accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Authy0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Workspace 2-Step Verification is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models four times of 52. Google Authenticator is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models five times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Cisco Duo37%
02Microsoft Entra ID28%
03Google Workspace 2-Step Verification7%
04Google Authenticator7%
05Microsoft Authenticator6%
06JumpCloud Protect1%
07Okta Verify1%
08YubiKey0%
09Auth00%
10Authy0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Okta Verify
32%
12 of 37 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Fine for tiny teams, but once you scale, the per‑user pricing jumps to $6–$17/month, which may exceed your budget.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Google Authenticator
24%
8 of 34 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Standard TOTP authenticator apps (like Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator in basic mode, Authy, etc.) are better than SMS but still have limitations” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Auth0
17%
4 of 24 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Developer-oriented; not the easiest choice for non-technical teams just wanting to protect their SaaS logins.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt
Cisco Duo
4%
3 of 71 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Using "Approve/Deny" prompts on mobile apps (common in Duo or Okta) is popular but has specific vulnerabilities known as MFA Fatigue or Push Bombing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 697 links across 164 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 20 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

37 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CISA32 answers · 55 citations · 12 models
31 answers · 60 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Microsoft16 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Okta15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Protectimus14 answers · 14 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best mfa solution”, “mfa solution”, “mfa solutions”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Cisco parent site
Cisco Duo 37%
37%189165,00048,352
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Entra ID 28%, Microsoft Authenticator 6%, Microsoft 365 3%
37%4992,240,000403,136
Google Workspace workspace.google.com
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification 7%
7%17368,0007,42240,583,075$2,344
Google Titan google.dev
Google Authenticator 7%, Google Titan 0%
7%60165,0002,858881,346109
WorkOS workos.com3%3012,10010733,47875
JumpCloud Protect jumpcloud.com1%321706108,479$8,612807
Okta Verify okta.com1%12249,5001,3221,959,740118
Built-in MFA from Microsoft or Google1%
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) with Free Tier or Microsoft 365 Built-in MFA1%
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) with Microsoft Authenticator1%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aimultiple.com, microsoft.com, reddit.com). The first result for “best mfa solution” is miniorange.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best MFA solution for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-factor authentication tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top MFA solutions for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best MFA solution for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a MFA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which MFA solutions should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Five alternativesAuthy, Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Authenticator
Google Authenticator, Microsoft AuthenticatorChanged
Two alternativesCisco Duo, Okta Verify
Google Authenticator
Four alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, LastPass MFA, Microsoft Entra ID
Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Four alternativesAuthy, Built-in MFA in Google Workspace, Built-in MFA in Microsoft 365, Cisco Duo
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra ID
Two alternativesCisco Duo, Okta Verify
Cisco DuoChanged
One alternativeMicrosoft Entra ID
Cisco Duo
Four alternativesGoogle Authenticator, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Three alternativesGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Hardware security keys, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Auth0, Cisco Duo
Built-in MFA from Microsoft or Googlenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCisco Duo, WorkOS
Nine alternatives1Password, Auth0, Bitwarden, Clerk, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Entra ID, Stytch, YubiKey
Cisco Duo, WorkOSHeld
Four alternativesAuth0, Clerk, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco Duo, Google Prompts, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternatives1Password, Bitwarden, YubiKey
against: Okta Verify
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesCisco Duo, UserLock
against: YubiKey
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, JumpCloud Protect
nothing named
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, YubiKey
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDChanged
Five alternativesAuth0, Descope, JumpCloud Protect, Stytch, WorkOS
Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, YubiKey
against: Google Authenticator, Okta Verify
Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, miniOrange
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft 365nothing named
Grok 4.20Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) with Microsoft Authenticator
Two alternativesCisco Duo, Okta Verify
Cisco DuoChanged
Three alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Authenticator or Azure AD MFA, YubiKey
against: Okta Verify
Cisco Duo
Four alternativesAuth0, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) with Free Tier or Microsoft 365 Built-in MFA
Three alternativesCisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
no first choice
Seven alternatives1Password, Cisco Duo, Google Workspace context-aware access, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, YubiKey
against: Google Authenticator
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Entra ID
One alternativeCisco Duo
Cisco DuoChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Microsoft Entra ID
Five alternativesAuth0, Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, LastPass MFA, OneLogin MFA
Google Authenticator
Three alternativesCisco Duo, OTPLESS, miniOrange
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashCisco Duo
One alternativeMicrosoft Entra ID
Cisco DuoHeld
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Google Authenticator
Cisco Duo
Three alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, YubiKey
against: Auth0, Google Authenticator
Cisco Duo
Four alternativesAuthy, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID
against: YubiKey
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, YubiKey
against: Cisco Duo, Okta Verify
against: Authy, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, YubiKey
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceJumpCloud ProtectChanged
Three alternativesAuth0, Gatekeeper, Google Authenticator
no first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeGoogle Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) / Google Authenticator
Cisco DuoChanged
One alternativeOkta Verify
Cisco Duo
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud Identity, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Okta Verify
Cisco Duo
Three alternativesAuth0, Microsoft Entra ID, miniOrange
Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, Google's native MFA, YubiKey
against: Okta Verify
against: Cisco Duo, Okta Verify
Kimi K2Cisco Duo
Three alternativesAuth0, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco DuoHeld
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesAuth0, JumpCloud Protect
against: Okta Verify
Cisco Duo
Two alternativesGoogle Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeCisco Duo
against: Google Authenticator
GLM 4.7 FlashXCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesGoogle Authenticator, Okta Verify
Cisco DuoChanged
Three alternativesAuth0, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Five alternativesAuth0, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, JumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify, YubiKey
Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesAuthy, Cisco Duo
against: Auth0, OTPLESS, Okta Verify, Protectimus
Cisco Duo
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
against: Ping Identity MFA
nothing named
MiniMax M2.5Cisco Duo
Two alternativesManageEngine ADSelfService Plus, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco DuoHeld
Three alternatives1Password, LastPass MFA, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Four alternativesGoogle Authenticator, JumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Auth0, Google Authenticatorno first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeCisco Duo
Microsoft Entra IDChanged
One alternativeCisco Duo
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect
against: Okta Verify
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativepasskeys or FIDO security keys
against: SMS
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeJumpCloud Protect
against: Okta Verify
Cisco DuoChanged
Two alternativesDescope, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesAuthy, Google Authenticator, JumpCloud Protect
against: Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA
Cisco Duo
Two alternativesGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Google Authenticator
no first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:44no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:09yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:52no013 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:06yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:31yes526 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:55yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:29yes2031 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:16yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:17yes1222 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:16yes1428 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:11yes1866 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:14yes541 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:09yes38 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:28yes1317 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:06no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:49yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:28no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:37yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:28yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:19yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:45yes2323 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:26yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:30yes1019 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:23yes1541 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:02yes1029 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:44yes528 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:40yes210 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:01yes2227 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:05yes1511 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:46yes36 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:07no020 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:49yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:27yes515 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:18yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:47yes2442 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:41yes84 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:12yes939 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:44yes1936 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:51yes1839 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:53yes520 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:13yes514 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:25yes1232 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:18no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:49no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:51yes621 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:11yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:22yes512 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:25yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:39yes2428 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:17yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:41yes521 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:06yes1026 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:45yes1947 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:47yes545 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:05yes313 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:30yes1219 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:06no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:59no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:07no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:35yes107 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:45yes511 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:10no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:06yes1952 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:34yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:54yes534 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:00yes1320 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:35yes1422 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:01no0119 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:53yes210 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 18:19no04 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:22yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:47yes35 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:35no016 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:09yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:32yes1013 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:48yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:49yes2143 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:45yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:43yes1343 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:27yes1444 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:35yes2454 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:46yes1039 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:20yes313 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 18:15yes1419 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google 2-Step Verification read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
Google 2-Step Verification (2SV) read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
Google Workspace read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
Google's built-in 2-step verification read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
JumpCloud read as JumpCloud Protect
LastPass read as LastPass MFA
LastPass Business read as LastPass MFA
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra (Azure AD) read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Verify
Okta Adaptive MFA read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity (SMB tiers) read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
OneLogin by One Identity read as OneLogin MFA
RSA read as RSA SecurID
Unresolved, counted raw
Azure AD Entra ID
Azure AD MFA
Built-in MFA from Microsoft or Google
Built-in MFA in Google Workspace
Built-in MFA in Microsoft 365
ESET Secure Authentication
Google Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) / Google Authenticator
Google Prompts
Google Workspace Admin
Google Workspace context-aware access
Google's native MFA
Hardware security keys
LoginTC
Microsoft Authenticator or Azure AD MFA (now Entra ID)
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) with Free Tier or Microsoft 365 Built-in MFA
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) with Microsoft Authenticator
Rublon
SMS
Titan Security Key
UserLock
WatchGuard AuthPoint
authenticator apps
passkeys or FIDO security keys
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Identity verificationNHI management →