Recruiting CRM and sourcing for small business buyers
Asked as “candidate sourcing tool”, and as “recruiting CRM”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
23%
Contested · Manatal 21%
23Pin21Manatal11Zoho Recruit45others
23% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Lever vs PinLever vs hireEZLever vs LinkedIn RecruiterLever vs SeekOutGem vs ManatalGem vs Zoho RecruitGem vs PinGem vs hireEZGem vs LinkedIn RecruiterGem vs SeekOutManatal vs Zoho RecruitManatal vs PinManatal vs hireEZManatal vs LinkedIn RecruiterManatal vs SeekOutZoho Recruit vs PinZoho Recruit vs hireEZZoho Recruit vs LinkedIn RecruiterZoho Recruit vs SeekOutPin vs hireEZPin vs LinkedIn RecruiterPin vs SeekOuthireEZ vs LinkedIn RecruiterhireEZ vs SeekOutLinkedIn Recruiter vs SeekOut
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04F05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Pin23%
Pin23%02Manatal21%
Manatal21%03Zoho Recruit11%
Zoho Recruit11%04Juicebox4%
Juicebox4%05Fetcher4%
06LinkedIn Recruiter4%
LinkedIn Recruiter4%07Gem2%
Gem2%08Workable2%
Workable2%09Loxo0%
Loxo0%10Breezy HR0%
Breezy HR0%11ContactOut0%
ContactOut0%12SeekOut0%
SeekOut0%13hireEZ0%
hireEZ0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
LinkedIn Recruiter58%
18 of 31 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Enterprise-Grade Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) (e.g., Workday, Oracle Taleo, high-tier Enterprise LinkedIn Recruiter)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Coupa Sourcing100%
6 of 6 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Enterprise source-to-pay suites (SAP Ariba, Coupa, Workday P2P, GEP, JAGGAER). These get explicitly bad reviews for small teams.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
SAP Ariba100%
6 of 6 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Enterprise tools like SAP Ariba, Coupa, or Jaggaer were built for Fortune 500 teams with dedicated implementation budgets and months of onboarding time” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
hireEZ50%
7 of 14 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid hireEZ unless you have a dedicated recruiter and larger budget — it's powerful but overkill for most small B2B companies.” Kimi K2, direct prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 813 links across 246 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
46 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Pin35 answers · 65 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Leonar31 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Lever16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Metaview15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Juicebox15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Intervue14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Reddit12 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Gem11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best candidate sourcing tool”, “candidate sourcing tool”, “sourcing tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pin pin.com | 23% | 104 | 368,000 | 243,385 | 24,375 | 28 | 2 | |
| Manatal manatal.com | 21% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | ||
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 11% | 11% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Recruit CRM recruitcrm.io | 9% | 109 | 2,400 | 149 | 6,950 | 18 | ||
| Juicebox juicebox.ai | 4% | 92 | 49,500 | 976 | 40,220 | $2,850 | 88 | 5 |
| Fetcher | 4% | 2,900 | 113 | |||||
| Apollo.io apollo.io | 4% | 14 | 33,100 | 396 | 111,608 | 94 | ||
| HubSpot hubspot.com HubSpot CRM 4% | 4% | 7 | 368,000 | 9,776 | 2,276,428 company | $83,922 | 76 | |
| LinkedIn parent site LinkedIn Recruiter 4% | 4% | 108 | 11,100,000 | 77,031 | ||||
| Gem gem.com | 2% | 182 | 246,000 | 225,116 | 16,291 | 10 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 7 of them are among the sites the models cited here (hiretruffle.com, juicebox.ai, metaview.ai, peoplemanagingpeople.com, pin.com, reddit.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best candidate sourcing tool” is hiretruffle.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best candidate sourcing tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which recruiting CRM would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top sourcing tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best candidate sourcing tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a candidate sourcing tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which sourcing tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5LinkedIn RecruiterHubSpot CRM, PipedriveChangedPinagainst: LinkedIn RecruiterMetaview, Pinno first choiceagainst: Coupa Sourcing, Jaggaer, SAP Ariba
Three alternatives
Manatal, Metaview, WorkableThree alternatives
Freshsales, Monday.com Sales CRM, Zoho CRMThree alternatives
ContactOut, Manatal, WorkableTwo alternatives
Manatal, Zoho RecruitGPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn RecruiterHubSpot CRMChangedagainst: SalesforceLinkedIn Recruiteragainst: GreenhouseZoho Recruitagainst: ZoomInfo Talentno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Gem, LoxoTwo alternatives
Pipedrive, Zoho CRMFive alternatives
AmazingHiring, Gem, SeekOut, Wellfound, hireEZOne alternative
GetProspectGemini 3.5 FlashApollo.ioagainst: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOutRecruit CRMChangedJuiceboxagainst: LinkedIn RecruiterPinagainst: LinkedIn RecruiterGemagainst: LinkedIn Recruiter, Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting
Five alternatives
Fetcher, Gem, Juicebox, LinkedIn Recruiter, NoonFive alternatives
Gem, Lever, Loxo, Manatal, WorkableFour alternatives
Fetcher, Leonar, Loxo, SignalHireEight alternatives
Breezy HR, HiredAI, Hunter.io, Manatal, Recruit\u2019em, Snov.io, Wellfound, Zoho RecruitSix alternatives
Ashby, ContactOut, Juicebox, Lusha, Pin, WellfoundPerplexity SonarPinRecruit CRMChangedPinManatal, Pinno first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, ContactOut, LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, Workday Recruiting
Three alternatives
Juicebox, Manatal, hireEZThree alternatives
HubSpot Sales Hub, Manatal, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
Fetcher, LinkedIn Recruiter, Loxo, Manatal, hireEZGrok 4.20Zoho RecruitZoho RecruitHeldJuicebox, Leonar, Manatal, PinIndeedagainst: LinkedIn, LinkedIn Recruiter, Workableno first choiceagainst: 1688, AliExpress, Alibaba, Coupa Sourcing, Global Sources, LinkedIn Recruiter, Made-in-China.com, SAP Ariba, SAP S/4HANA
Six alternatives
Breezy HR, Fetcher, Juicebox, LinkedIn Recruiter, Pin, WorkableThree alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, ManatalTwo alternatives
ContactOut, LoxoFive alternatives
Breezy HR, Fetcher, Juicebox, Wellfound, Zoho RecruitMistral SmallFetcher, Manatalagainst: PinManatalChangedGemagainst: hireEZManatal, Pinagainst: LinkedIn Recruiterno first choiceagainst: Coupa Sourcing, SAP Ariba
Two alternatives
Nimble, Recruit CRMFour alternatives
ContactOut, Humanly, Loxo, ManatalTwo alternatives
Juicebox, NoonDeepSeek V4 FlashJuicebox, Pinagainst: LinkedIn Recruiter, hireEZRecruit CRMChangedContactOut, Loxoagainst: ZoomInfoJuiceboxagainst: LinkedIn Recruiterno first choiceagainst: Beamery, LinkedIn Recruiter, iCIMSagainst: Coupa Sourcing, GEP SMART, Gem, Jaggaer, LinkedIn Recruiter, SAP Ariba, SeekOut, Workday P2P, hireEZ
Two alternatives
Gem, ManatalThree alternatives
Nimble, Pin, Zoho RecruitSix alternatives
Breezy HR, Gem, JazzHR, SeekOut, Zoho Recruit, hireEZThree alternatives
Manatal, Wiza, Zoho RecruitLlama 4 MaverickPinNimbleChangedno first choicePinno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Intervue, SourcrLabFour alternatives
Bullhorn, Recruit CRM, Recruiterflow, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Loxo, ManatalFour alternatives
Fetcher, Juicebox, Leonar, ManatalQwen 3.7 FlashFetcherZoho RecruitChangedagainst: BullhornGem, ManatalPinagainst: Greenhouse, Juicebox, Lever, hireEZno first choiceagainst: AliExpress, Oracle NetSuite, SAP, Temu
Two alternatives
Breezy HR, PinTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, Recruit CRMThree alternatives
ContactOut, Loxo, WaalaxyTwo alternatives
Indeed, ManatalKimi K2Manatal, Pinagainst: hireEZManatal, Recruit CRMChangedLoxo, ManatalManatalagainst: LinkedIn RecruiterWorkableagainst: AdSpy, Alibaba, Coupa Sourcing, Global Sources, LinkedIn Recruiter, Made-in-China.com, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, PiPiAds, SAP Ariba
One alternative
WorkableTwo alternatives
Loxo, WorkableSix alternatives
ContactOut, Fetcher, Gem, Leonar, Lusha, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Juicebox, PinThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Greenhouse, JazzHRGLM 4.7 FlashXManatalagainst: SeekOutManatalHeldagainst: HubSpot CRM, PipedriveGem, Loxoagainst: hireEZApollo.ioagainst: LinkedIn Recruiterno first choiceagainst: Alibaba-style platforms
Six alternatives
100Hires, ContactOut, Gem, Juicebox, Pin, hireEZTwo alternatives
Recruit CRM, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
Humanly, Juicebox, Manatal, Pin, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Boolean Builder, Zoho RecruitMiniMax M2.5no first choiceLever, Zoho RecruitChangedLeonar, LoxoManatal, Pinno first choiceagainst: LinkedIn Recruiteragainst: Coupa Sourcing, GEP SMART, Jaggaer, LinkedIn Recruiter, SAP Ariba, SeekOut, hireEZ
Two alternatives
Manatal, WorkableFour alternatives
Gem, Juicebox, LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Juicebox, LoxoThree alternatives
Juicebox, Loxo, PinBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:28 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:08 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:37 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:42 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:10 | yes | 38 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:08 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 16 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 21:41 | yes | 8 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:06 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:04 | yes | 12 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:36 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:46 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:49 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:36 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:41 | yes | 28 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:12 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:18 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:28 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:41 | yes | 15 | 79 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:20 | yes | 6 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:05 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:54 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:47 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:01 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:43 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:55 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:58 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:58 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:23 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:54 | yes | 8 | 48 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:07 | yes | 28 | 104 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:40 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:48 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:57 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:53 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:56 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:52 | yes | 33 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:35 | yes | 16 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:04 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:24 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:50 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:55 | yes | 24 | 99 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:33 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:26 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:35 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:52 | yes | 12 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:18 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:31 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:42 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:35 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:11 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:54 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:58 | yes | 15 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:35 | yes | 7 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:05 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:33 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:10 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:02 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:27 | yes | 24 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:55 | yes | 18 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:27 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:23 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:28 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:40 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Apollo read as Apollo.io
Breezy read as Breezy HR
Coupa read as Coupa Sourcing
GEP read as GEP SMART
Google X-Ray read as Google X-Ray Search
HubSpot read as HubSpot CRM
Made-in-China read as Made-in-China.com
Noon AI read as Noon
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
Unresolved, counted raw
1688
AdSpy
Alibaba-style platforms
Boolean Builder
CJ Dropshipping
Cin7 Core
Connecting Odds
Data Miner
Doba
GetProspect
Monday.com Sales CRM
Oberlo
PiPiAds
Recruit\u2019em
SAP S/4HANA
SaleHoo
SourcrLab
Spendwise
Temu
Text Blaze
Workday P2P
Zapro
Zoho Inventory
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.