Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Workforce planning › TeamOhana vs 4PLAN HR
Workforce planning · November 2026 Edition

TeamOhana vs 4PLAN HR

One of fourteen models named TeamOhana first on the direct prompt; zero named 4PLAN HR. TeamOhana was named by nine of the fourteen models and 4PLAN HR by seven and TeamOhana carries 17 labels and 4PLAN HR 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

TeamOhana

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

4PLAN HR

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share5%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 20; printed, not drawn.
Labels1715A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, TeamOhana reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs TeamOhana · ChartHop vs 4PLAN HR · Pigment vs TeamOhana

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamOhanaFirst choices, of fourteen models4PLAN HR
Direct10
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained03
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where TeamOhana and 4PLAN HR stood in it.
ModelDirect4HParaphrase4HComparative4HBudget-constrained4HScale-constrained4HNegative4H
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.204H4H
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash4H
Kimi K24H4H
GLM 4.7 FlashX4H
MiniMax M2.54H
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B4H4H4H
TeamOhana4H 4PLAN HR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, TeamOhana on the left and 4PLAN HR on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where TeamOhana and 4PLAN HR stood in it.

TeamOhana first, 4PLAN HR not the choice

1 of 14 models4PLAN HR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Pigment, TeamOhana alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Runn, Saviom, TeamOhana
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Pigment, Planful, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Deel Workforce Planning, Monday.com, Planful, Rotageek, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2ChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Dayforce, Planful, TeamOhana, UKG Pro Workforce Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning
MiniMax M2.5Disprz alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Orgvue, Planful, TeamOhana
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, TeamOhana
Muse Glimmer 30BChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Centage, Disprz, Orgvue, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, Paylocity alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Rippling, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, HiBob, Rippling
Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning
Mistral SmallDisprz alternatives: ChartHop, Orgvue, Planful
Llama 4 MaverickChartHop alternatives: Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
4PLAN HR is not named for this buyer.
TeamOhana0%#11 of 15
4PLAN HR—not named
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
TeamOhana5%#4 of 20
4PLAN HR5%#5 of 20
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
TeamOhana leads by two points.
TeamOhana2%#7 of 14
4PLAN HR0%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about TeamOhana

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Choose ChartHop or TeamOhana if HR and Recruiting are heavily involved” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with TeamOhana if you want a purpose-built, easy-to-implement solution” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: TeamOhana” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about 4PLAN HR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Demo 2–3 dedicated tools — ChartHop, 4PLAN HR, and either Pigment (if Finance uses it) or Planful/Prophix” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Dedicated tools: 4PLAN HR, Pigment, or similar platforms designed for mid-market” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“If you have about 500 employees or more, demo 4PLAN HR” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.