Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Workforce planning › Homebase vs Connecteam
Workforce planning · November 2026 Edition

Homebase vs Connecteam

Zero of fourteen models named Homebase first on the direct prompt; zero named Connecteam. Homebase was named by ten of the fourteen models and Connecteam by ten and Homebase carries 10 labels and Connecteam 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Homebase

accepted challenger

Named in twelve categories this edition.

Connecteam

accepted challenger

Named in eighteen categories this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 20; printed, not drawn.
Labels1013A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Homebase reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Homebase · ChartHop vs Connecteam · Pigment vs Homebase

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HomebaseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConnecteam
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against Connecteam
Budget-constrained62
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Homebase and Connecteam were named in the same answer 248 times, of the 382 answers naming Homebase and the 718 naming Connecteam. In those answers Connecteam took the first choice fifty-six times and Homebase sixty-seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Homebase and Connecteam stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Homebase Connecteam first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Homebase on the left and Connecteam on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Homebase and Connecteam stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, Paylocity alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Rippling, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, HiBob, Rippling
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Pigment, TeamOhana alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Runn, Saviom, TeamOhana
Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning
Mistral SmallDisprz alternatives: ChartHop, Orgvue, Planful
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Pigment, Planful, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 MaverickChartHop alternatives: Vena
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Deel Workforce Planning, Monday.com, Planful, Rotageek, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2ChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Dayforce, Planful, TeamOhana, UKG Pro Workforce Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning
MiniMax M2.5Disprz alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Orgvue, Planful, TeamOhana
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, TeamOhana
Muse Glimmer 30BChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Centage, Disprz, Orgvue, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Homebase11%#4 of 15
Connecteam11%#5 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Homebase leads by seven points.
Homebase11%#3 of 20
Connecteam4%#8 of 20
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Connecteam is not named for this buyer.
Homebase0%#– of 14
Connecteam—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Homebase

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Connecteam

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Not a strategic planning tool.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Connecteam's free plan if you have 10 or fewer employees, as it offers the most comprehensive feature set at no cost.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.