Workforce planning · November 2026 Edition
Homebase vs 4PLAN HR
Zero of fourteen models named Homebase first on the direct prompt; zero named 4PLAN HR. Homebase was named by ten of the fourteen models and 4PLAN HR by seven and Homebase carries 10 labels and 4PLAN HR 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in twelve categories this edition.
4PLAN HR
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share11%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 20; printed, not drawn.
Labels1015A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Homebase reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Homebase · ChartHop vs 4PLAN HR · Pigment vs Homebase
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HomebaseFirst choices, of fourteen models4PLAN HRDirect00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained60
Scale-constrained03
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Homebase and 4PLAN HR stood in it.
| Model | Direct4H | Paraphrase4H | Comparative4H | Budget-constrained4H | Scale-constrained4H | Negative4H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | | 4H | 4H | |||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 4H | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | 4H | | 4H | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4H | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | 4H | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 4H | | 4H | 4H |
Homebase4H 4PLAN HR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Homebase on the left and 4PLAN HR on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Homebase and 4PLAN HR stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Deel Workforce Planning, Monday.com, Planful, Rotageek, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2ChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Dayforce, Planful, TeamOhana, UKG Pro Workforce Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Centage, Disprz, Orgvue, Planful, Prophix, Vena
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, Paylocity alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Rippling, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, HiBob, Rippling
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Pigment, TeamOhana alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Runn, Saviom, TeamOhana
Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning
Mistral SmallDisprz alternatives: ChartHop, Orgvue, Planful
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Pigment, Planful, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 MaverickChartHop alternatives: Vena
MiniMax M2.5Disprz alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Orgvue, Planful, TeamOhana
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, TeamOhana
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
4PLAN HR is not named for this buyer.
Homebase11%#4 of 154PLAN HR—not named
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Homebase0%#– of 144PLAN HR0%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about Homebase
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about 4PLAN HR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Demo 2–3 dedicated tools — ChartHop, 4PLAN HR, and either Pigment (if Finance uses it) or Planful/Prophix” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Dedicated tools: 4PLAN HR, Pigment, or similar platforms designed for mid-market” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“If you have about 500 employees or more, demo 4PLAN HR” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared
ChartHop vs HomebaseChartHop vs 4PLAN HRPigment vs HomebasePigment vs 4PLAN HRHomebase vs TeamOhanaHomebase vs PlanfulHomebase vs Workday Adaptive PlanningHomebase vs ConnecteamTeamOhana vs 4PLAN HR4PLAN HR vs Planful4PLAN HR vs Workday Adaptive Planning4PLAN HR vs ConnecteamAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full workforce planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.