Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition
Pingboard vs Orgvue
Two of fourteen models named Pingboard first on the direct prompt; zero named Orgvue. Pingboard was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Orgvue by nine and Pingboard carries 35 labels and Orgvue 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share5%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels3510A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Pingboard reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Pingboard · ChartHop vs Orgvue · Organimi vs Pingboard
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PingboardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgvue
Direct20
Paraphrase011 against Pingboard · 3 against Orgvue
Comparative40
Budget-constrained001 against Pingboard
Scale-constrained111 against Pingboard
Negative204 against Pingboard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Pingboard and Orgvue stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Pingboard Orgvue first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Pingboard on the left and Orgvue on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Pingboard and Orgvue stood in it.
Pingboard first, Orgvue not the choice
2 of 14 modelsOrgvue was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Orgvue is not named for this buyer.
Pingboard18%#2 of 13Orgvue—not namedMid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Orgvue leads at enterprise.
Orgvue15%#3 of 13Pingboard0%#12 of 13What the models said about Pingboard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Updates are mostly manual unless you set up custom automation, and it lacks native HRIS-level directory syncing” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“simple org chart software (like Pingboard) lacks the data-driven modeling needed for strategic planning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“those are more HR-platform style products and can cost more than a simple diagramming tool” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Better alternatives: ... Tools with built‑in employee directories and live updates (e.g., Pingboard, ChartHop, Organimi, Ingentis, etc.)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“A dedicated org chart + directory tool — it keeps charts automatically current by syncing with your HR system” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most mid-market B2B companies find Pingboard or ChartHop to be the sweet spot” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Orgvue
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Invest in Orgvue/Ingentis only if you have dedicated budget for complex workforce costing and global compliance requirements.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd generally recommend Orgvue if your main need is organizational design plus workforce planning” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tools like *ChartHop*, *OrgVue*, or *Pingboard*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for Deep Enterprise-Grade Modeling: Orgvue ... Caveat: Higher learning curve and significantly higher price point” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
ChartHop vs PingboardChartHop vs OrgvueOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs OrgvueLucidchart vs PingboardLucidchart vs OrgvueFunctionly vs PingboardFunctionly vs OrgvueOrgChart vs PingboardOrgChart vs OrgvuePingboard vs MiroOrgvue vs MiroAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full org charts standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.