Index › HR › Onboarding and employee experience › Employee engagement surv › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Employee engagement surveys for small business buyers

Asked as “employee engagement survey platform”, and as “employee pulse survey tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · 15Five Engage 21%
27Workleap Officevibe2115Five Engage14ThriveSparrow Engage38others

27% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−14Since October 2026: 41% → 27%, −14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Workleap Officevibe held the lead, −14 points on 41%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Workleap Officevibe27%10%48accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 41% → 27%, −14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.41% → 27%
0215Five Engage21%6%53accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 14% → 21%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 21%
03ThriveSparrow Engage14%0%23accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 0% → 14%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.0% → 14%
04FeedbackPulse9%0%15accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 21% → 9%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.21% → 9%
05SurveyMonkey4%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
06Culture Amp4%63%35criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
07Bonusly2%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08Google Forms Lab in the set2%27%11criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
09Lattice Engagement2%48%31criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Qualtrics EmployeeXM0%80%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Leapsome0%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Forms is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
T03
04
05
06
07
08
L09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Workleap Officevibe27%
0215Five Engage21%
03ThriveSparrow Engage14%
04FeedbackPulse9%
05SurveyMonkey4%
06Culture Amp4%
07Bonusly2%
08Google Forms2%
09Lattice Engagement2%
10Leapsome0%
11Qualtrics EmployeeXM0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lattice Engagement
48%
15 of 31 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget: Lattice Engagement at $4 per seat per month but with a $4,000 annual minimum spend.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
Culture Amp
63%
22 of 35 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid: Platforms that only offer "quote-based" pricing or large annual commitments (like Culture Amp or Lattice at very low headcounts)” Kimi K2, comparative prompt
Qualtrics EmployeeXM
80%
12 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“avoid starting with enterprise-oriented platforms such as Culture Amp or Qualtrics” Perplexity Sonar, direct prompt
Quantum Workplace
80%
4 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget: ... Workleap / Quantum Workplace flat platform fees e.g. $4,999/yr minimum.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 768 links across 266 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · ThriveSparrow30 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group24 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FeedbackPulse23 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FirstHR23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · CultureMonkey11 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Betterworks11 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Paycor10 answers · 10 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best employee engagement survey platform”, “employee engagement survey platform”, “engagement platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Workleap workleap.com
Workleap Officevibe 27%
27%81140767,808 company$7406
15Five Engage 15five.com21%110032,36222
ThriveSparrow thrivesparrow.com
ThriveSparrow Engage 14%
14%43110124,9782
FeedbackPulse feedbackpulse.com9%8320021,1844
SurveyMonkey surveymonkey.com4%64165,0002,0231,683,535$500106
Zoho parent site
Zoho Survey 4%
4%10
Culture Amp cultureamp.com4%35414,800121174,918355
Bonusly bonusly.com2%20014,8007544,59521
Microsoft Forms microsoft.com2%26145,358,109$12,455103
Effy effy.ai
Effy AI 2%
2%77140340,950 company

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (matterapp.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best employee engagement survey platform” is matterapp.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best employee engagement survey platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee pulse survey tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top engagement platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best employee engagement survey platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an employee engagement survey platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which engagement platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SurveyMonkey
Three alternativesSurveyLegend, TINYpulse, Workleap Officevibe
against: Zoho Survey
FeedbackPulse, Workleap OfficevibeChanged
One alternativeTINYpulse
no first choiceZoho Survey
Five alternativesAssembly, CultureMonkey, FeedbackPulse, QuestionPro Workforce, Workleap Officevibe
no first choiceagainst: Braze, Drift, Iterable, Zendesk
GPT-5.4 miniIncogneato, Wotter
One alternativeBenepik
against: Betterworks, Flex Surveys
Workleap OfficevibeChanged
Two alternativesCulture Amp, Nectar
against: Qualtrics EmployeeXM
no first choice
Seven alternativesBenepik, Bonusly, Culture Amp, Incogneato, Nectar, Workvivo, Wotter
Clarity Wave
Two alternativesIncogneato, SurveyMars
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkleap Officevibe
Five alternatives15Five Engage, BambooHR, Gusto, Leapsome, Rippling
against: Lattice Engagement
Workleap OfficevibeHeld
Three alternatives15Five Engage, Leapsome, Polly
Workleap Officevibe
Six alternatives15Five Engage, Bonusly, CultureBot, Donut, Lattice Engagement, Polly
Workleap Officevibe
Four alternativesConnecteam, Google Forms, Microsoft Forms, SurveySparrow
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Workleap Officevibe
Five alternativesBambooHR, Empuls, Gusto, Leapsome, Rippling
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement
against: Adobe Experience Platform, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Perplexity Sonar15Five Engage
One alternativeWorkleap Officevibe
against: Culture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Workleap OfficevibeChanged
Three alternatives15Five Engage, Matter, ThriveSparrow Engage
against: Google Forms
Bonusly
Three alternatives15Five Engage, Connecteam, Workleap Officevibe
against: Brevo, Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement
ThriveSparrow Engage
Two alternatives15Five Engage, Zoho Survey
against: Workleap Officevibe
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.20Workleap Officevibe
Two alternativesFeedbackPulse, ThriveSparrow Engage
against: 15Five Engage, Culture Amp, Gallup Access, Google Forms, Lattice Engagement, Leapsome, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SurveyMonkey
ThriveSparrow EngageChanged
Five alternatives15Five Engage, Lattice Engagement, Microsoft Viva Glint, SurveySparrow, Workleap Officevibe
against: Culture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Workleap Officevibe
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Bonusly, Connecteam, Leapsome
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement
Google Forms, Microsoft Forms
Two alternativesHappily Surveys, Workleap Officevibe
against: 15Five Engage, Bonusly, Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Leapsome
Workleap Officevibe
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Jotform, Leapsome, Sogolytics
against: Culture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
against: Discord, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit, Telegram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X, YouTube
Mistral SmallSurveyMonkey
Three alternativesPeopleGoal, Teamflect, Workleap Officevibe
15Five Engage, FeedbackPulseChanged
One alternativeMicrosoft Viva Glint
Workleap Officevibe
Five alternatives15Five Engage, Bonusly, Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Matter
Engagedly
Three alternatives15Five Engage, ThriveSparrow Engage, Workleap Officevibe
no first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Salesforce Service Cloud
DeepSeek V4 Flash15Five Engage
Three alternativesSurveyMonkey, ThriveSparrow Engage, Workleap Officevibe
against: Culture Amp
15Five EngageHeld
Three alternativesFeedbackPulse, ThriveSparrow Engage, Workleap Officevibe
against: Culture Amp, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Workleap Officevibe
Five alternatives15Five Engage, Bonusly, Connecteam, Leapsome, Nectar
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement
ThriveSparrow Engage
Three alternatives15Five Engage, Effy AI, SurveyMonkey
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Quantum Workplace, Workleap Officevibe
ThriveSparrow Engage
Three alternatives15Five Engage, FeedbackPulse, Small Improvements
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Workleap Officevibe
against: Hootsuite, HubSpot, Outreach, SalesLoft, Sprout Social
Llama 4 MaverickWorkleap Officevibe
Two alternatives15Five Engage, Leapsome
FeedbackPulseChanged
Three alternatives15Five Engage, Culture Amp, ThriveSparrow Engage
Bonusly
Ten alternativesAchievers, Assembly, ClearCo, Culture Amp, CultureMonkey, Lattice Engagement, Motivosity, Nectar, Perkbox, WorkTango
ThriveSparrow Engage
Three alternatives15Five Engage, FeedbackPulse, Leapsome
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 Flash15Five Engage
Two alternativesLeapsome, Workleap Officevibe
15Five Engage, Workleap OfficevibeChanged
One alternativeFeedbackPulse
against: Jotform, SurveyMonkey
Workleap Officevibe
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Connecteam, Lattice Engagement, Mentimeter
against: Culture Amp, Motivosity
FeedbackPulse
Two alternativesGoogle Forms, ThriveSparrow Engage
against: 15Five Engage, Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Microsoft Viva Glint, Qualtrics EmployeeXM
15Five Engage, Lattice Engagement
Three alternativesBetterteam, TINYpulse, Workleap Officevibe
against: Culture Amp, Google Forms, Microsoft Viva Glint, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SurveyMonkey
against: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Hootsuite, HubSpot, Mailchimp, Outreach, SalesLoft, Salesforce, Sprout Social, Wishpond, Zoho Campaigns
Kimi K215Five Engage, FeedbackPulse
Two alternativesSurveyMonkey, Workleap Officevibe
against: Culture Amp, Quantum Workplace
Workleap OfficevibeChanged
Two alternatives15Five Engage, FeedbackPulse
against: Culture Amp
15Five Engage, Bonusly
One alternativeDonut
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement, Leapsome
Happily.ai, Zoho Survey
One alternativePeopleGoal
Culture Amp
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Leapsome, ThriveSparrow Engage, Workleap Officevibe
nothing named
GLM 4.7 FlashXWorkleap Officevibe
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Lattice Engagement, Motivosity, ThriveSparrow Engage
15Five EngageChanged
Two alternativesMatter, ThriveSparrow Engage
against: Workleap Officevibe
15Five Engage, Bonusly
Seven alternativesConnecteam, Lattice Engagement, Leapsome, Motivosity, ThriveSparrow Engage, WorkTango, Workleap Officevibe
against: Culture Amp, Kudos, Quantum Workplace
ThriveSparrow Engage
Five alternatives15Five Engage, Bonusly, Google Forms, Leapsome, Microsoft Forms
against: Lattice Engagement
no first choiceagainst: Gong, Outreach, SalesLoft
MiniMax M2.5Workleap Officevibe
One alternativeSurveyMonkey
against: Culture Amp, Lattice Engagement
ThriveSparrow EngageChanged
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Matter, SurveyMonkey, Workleap Officevibe
Bonusly
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Connecteam, Lattice Engagement, Workleap Officevibe
Effy AI
Two alternatives15Five Engage, ThriveSparrow Engage
Culture Amp
Four alternatives15Five Engage, Enalyzer, Lattice Engagement, TINYpulse
against: Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SurveyMonkey Engage
nothing named
GPT-6 Luna15Five Engage
Two alternativesCulture Amp, Lattice Engagement
15Five EngageHeldno first choice15Five Engage
Two alternativesMicrosoft Forms, Zoho People
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BWorkleap Officevibe
Three alternatives15Five Engage, Bonusly, ThriveSparrow Engage
ThriveSparrow EngageChanged
Two alternatives15Five Engage, FeedbackPulse
Workleap Officevibe
Six alternatives15Five Engage, Awardco, Bonusly, Lattice Engagement, Matter, TINYpulse
Bonusly
Six alternatives15Five Engage, Effy AI, Matter, SurveyMonkey, Tap My Back, ThriveSparrow Engage
against: Lattice Engagement, Quantum Workplace, Workleap Officevibe
no first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:18yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:56yes111 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:02yes1023 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:09yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:29yes531 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:04yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:03yes2326 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:39yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:27yes1125 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:55yes1047 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:33yes2164 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:53yes555 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:22yes413 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:56yes1020 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:21yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:43yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:53no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:59yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:09yes529 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:32yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:24yes2217 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:49yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:38yes527 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:16yes1529 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:55yes2051 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:07yes833 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:35yes214 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:45yes1018 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:27yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:51yes37 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:43no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:55yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes1029 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:56yes58 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:03yes2432 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:40yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:44yes1037 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:50yes1953 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:59yes1963 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:09yes1358 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:20no02 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:19yes1424 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:25yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:33yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:30yes1217 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:13yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:09yes1051 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:16yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:57yes2322 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:55yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:03yes1029 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:51yes516 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:44yes921 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:07yes514 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:15yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:35yes1326 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:13no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:07no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:53no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:53yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:14yes533 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:53no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:56yes2337 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:02yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:23no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:55yes1420 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:00yes1395 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:23no018 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:22yes115 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:49yes1323 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:35yes2010 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:05no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:00no017 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:38yes103 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:12yes1052 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:58yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:16yes2427 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:07yes105 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:18yes2451 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:55yes2546 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:54yes2567 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:32no035 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:51yes210 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:00yes1518 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
15Five read as 15Five Engage
15Five (Engage Tier) read as 15Five Engage
15Five (Engage module) read as 15Five Engage
15Five (Engage plan) read as 15Five Engage
15Five (Engage) read as 15Five Engage
Gallup read as Gallup Access
Glint read as Microsoft Viva Glint
Lattice read as Lattice Engagement
Officevibe read as Workleap Officevibe
Officevibe (Workleap) read as Workleap Officevibe
Officevibe (by Workleap) read as Workleap Officevibe
Officevibe (now Workleap) read as Workleap Officevibe
Peakon read as Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics EmployeeXM
QuestionPro read as QuestionPro Workforce
ThriveSparrow read as ThriveSparrow Engage
Workleap read as Workleap Officevibe
Workleap (Officevibe) read as Workleap Officevibe
Workleap (formerly Officevibe) read as Workleap Officevibe
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Experience Platform (Marketo Enterprise)
Clarity Wave
Constant Contact
ConvertKit
CultureBot
Happily
Matter Surveys
Oracle Eloqua
SocialPilot
SurveyMonkey Engage
Wishpond
Zoho Campaigns
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Video interviewingGiving & volunteering →