Gartner provides technology research and benchmarking insight for executives and their teams
Gane, the publisher, sells software in Competitive intel, where this product is measured. It is measured there by the same method as every other product. How the conflict is handled.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Apollo.io is first at 39%.
Apollo.io is first at 22%.
AlphaSense is first at 25%.
“named in Reddit discussions as more credible alternatives for market intelligence”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
“Choosing technology vendors or understanding analyst views of a market: consider Gartner.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · alternative
“What to Avoid (Unless You Have Budget) | Gartner | $30K–$60K/year per seat; designed for large enterprises”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools like Qualtrics or Gartner unless your budget exceeds $50K+/year”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Excellent for high-level enterprise technology evaluation and IT strategy, but extremely expensive.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Often accused of "pay-to-play" bias... treat rankings as one data point”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Gartner, over the 36 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 6 | View → | |
| 17 | 6 | View → | |
| 14 | 1 | View → | |
| 13 | 3 | View → | |
| 13 | 2 | View → | |
| 12 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 20 of the 36 answers that named Gartner and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Gartner, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |