HubSpot Sales Hub vs Outreach
One of fourteen models named HubSpot Sales Hub first on the direct prompt; three named Outreach. Both were named by all fourteen models and HubSpot Sales Hub carries 60 labels and Outreach 61, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales engagement platforms page.
By framing
HubSpot Sales HubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOutreach
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, HubSpot Sales Hub and Outreach were named in the same answer 159 times, of the 756 answers naming HubSpot Sales Hub and the 309 naming Outreach. In those answers Outreach took the first choice forty times and HubSpot Sales Hub nineteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
HubSpot Sales Hub Outreach first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HubSpot Sales Hub on the left and Outreach on the right.The direct prompt
HubSpot Sales Hub first, Outreach not the choice
1 of 14 modelsOutreach was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Outreach first, HubSpot Sales Hub an alternative
3 of 14 modelsHubSpot Sales Hub was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
HubSpot Sales Hub23%#2 of 14Outreach2%#9 of 14HubSpot Sales Hub17%#3 of 12Outreach9%#4 of 12Outreach52%#1 of 9HubSpot Sales Hub2%#4 of 9What the models said about HubSpot Sales Hub
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Avoid HubSpot Sales Hub if you're scaling beyond a few users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
What the models said about Outreach
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid heavy enterprise tools like Outreach, Salesloft, or LinkedIn Sales Navigator add-ons” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Outreach if you're not a large enterprise with dedicated implementation support” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid - Outreach and Salesloft: ... overkill for limited budgets.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“It is widely considered the most robust and flexible platform... However, it can be complex to set up and is expensive.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Outreach has the deepest sequence builder, best-in-class A/B testing, and revenue intelligence layered on top.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Outreach for complex enterprise sales processes, strong governance, and advanced orchestration.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.