Index › GTM › Sales › Sales engagement › Apollo.io vs HubSpot Sales Hub
Sales engagement platforms · November 2026 Edition

Apollo.io vs HubSpot Sales Hub

Five of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; one named HubSpot Sales Hub. Both were named by all fourteen models and Apollo.io carries 66 labels and HubSpot Sales Hub 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Apollo.io

accepted challenger

San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.

HubSpot Sales Hub

accepted challenger

By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.

First-choice share30%17%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels6660A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Apollo.io reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Salesloft was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Salesloft vs Apollo.io · Salesloft vs HubSpot Sales Hub · Apollo.io vs Outreach

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales engagement platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHubSpot Sales Hub
Direct51
Paraphrase33
Comparative10
Budget-constrained85
Scale-constrained00
Negative105 against Apollo.io · 5 against HubSpot Sales Hub
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Apollo.io and HubSpot Sales Hub were named in the same answer 191 times, of the 1129 answers naming Apollo.io and the 756 naming HubSpot Sales Hub. In those answers HubSpot Sales Hub took the first choice twenty-eight times and Apollo.io fifty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Apollo.io and HubSpot Sales Hub stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Apollo.io HubSpot Sales Hub first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and HubSpot Sales Hub on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Apollo.io and HubSpot Sales Hub stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Claude Haiku 4.5Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub alternatives: Amplemarket

Apollo.io first, HubSpot Sales Hub an alternative

4 of 14 modelsHubSpot Sales Hub was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20Apollo.io alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach, Salesloft
DeepSeek V4 FlashApollo.io alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Salesloft
Llama 4 MaverickApollo.io, Outreach, Salesloft
Kimi K2Apollo.io, Salesloft alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach
Gemini 3.5 FlashSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, Gong Engage, HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach
Perplexity SonarOutreach alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub, Klenty, Salesloft
Mistral SmallSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub, Kixie, Outreach
Qwen 3.7 FlashSalesloft alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach
GLM 4.7 FlashXSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, Kixie, Mixmax
MiniMax M2.5Salesloft alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach
GPT-6 LunaSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach
Muse Glimmer 30BOutreach, Salesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Apollo.io leads by twenty-seven points.
Apollo.io50%#1 of 14
HubSpot Sales Hub23%#2 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Apollo.io leads by thirteen points.
Apollo.io30%#2 of 12
HubSpot Sales Hub17%#3 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Apollo.io2%#5 of 9
HubSpot Sales Hub2%#4 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Apollo.io

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about HubSpot Sales Hub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Avoid HubSpot Sales Hub if you're scaling beyond a few users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.