Apollo.io vs RB2B
One of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; zero named RB2B. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and RB2B by twelve and Apollo.io carries 37 labels and RB2B 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRB2B
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Apollo.io RB2B first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and RB2B on the right.The direct prompt
Apollo.io first, RB2B not the choice
1 of 14 modelsRB2B was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Apollo.io62%#1 of 13RB2B3%#4 of 13Apollo.io29%#2 of 12RB2B4%#6 of 12What the models said about Apollo.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Apollo.io and Bombora are the most frequently recommended due to their balance of affordability, ease of integration, and strong intent signals.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best All-in-One Platform (3rd-Party Intent Data): Apollo.io ... Free tier available; paid plans start around $49 to $99/user/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about RB2B
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Products such as RB2B, Vector, and Warmly can have narrower geographic coverage, with contact-level identification often limited to the United States” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Install RB2B on your website to identify individual visitors, and use Apollo\u2019s basic paid plan to run searches on company intent topics.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Around Choice: RB2B ... widely considered the best ROI tool for small budgets” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.