Apollo.io vs Dealfront
One of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; zero named Dealfront. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Dealfront by twelve and Apollo.io carries 37 labels and Dealfront 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDealfront
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Apollo.io Dealfront first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and Dealfront on the right.The direct prompt
Apollo.io first, Dealfront an alternative
1 of 14 modelsDealfront was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Apollo.io62%#1 of 13Dealfront10%#2 of 13Apollo.io29%#2 of 12Dealfront5%#4 of 12What the models said about Apollo.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Apollo.io and Bombora are the most frequently recommended due to their balance of affordability, ease of integration, and strong intent signals.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best All-in-One Platform (3rd-Party Intent Data): Apollo.io ... Free tier available; paid plans start around $49 to $99/user/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Dealfront
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“If you currently have no intent data, start small with a tool like Leadfeeder or a lighter tier of a larger provider to build a baseline.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses, Apollo.io or Leadfeeder offer the best combination of price and functionality.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.