Apollo.io vs HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
One of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; one named HubSpot Breeze Intelligence. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and HubSpot Breeze Intelligence by eight and Apollo.io carries 37 labels and HubSpot Breeze Intelligence 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in eleven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHubSpot Breeze Intelligence
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Apollo.io and HubSpot Breeze Intelligence were named in the same answer 198 times, of the 1129 answers naming Apollo.io and the 258 naming HubSpot Breeze Intelligence. In those answers HubSpot Breeze Intelligence took the first choice eight times and Apollo.io seventy-nine.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Apollo.io HubSpot Breeze Intelligence first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and HubSpot Breeze Intelligence on the right.The direct prompt
Apollo.io first, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence not the choice
1 of 14 modelsHubSpot Breeze Intelligence was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.HubSpot Breeze Intelligence first, Apollo.io not the choice
1 of 14 modelsApollo.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Apollo.io62%#1 of 13HubSpot Breeze Intelligence0%#10 of 13Apollo.io29%#2 of 12HubSpot Breeze Intelligence4%#7 of 12Apollo.io2%#– of 9HubSpot Breeze Intelligence0%#– of 9What the models said about Apollo.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Apollo.io and Bombora are the most frequently recommended due to their balance of affordability, ease of integration, and strong intent signals.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best All-in-One Platform (3rd-Party Intent Data): Apollo.io ... Free tier available; paid plans start around $49 to $99/user/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Premium product; reviewers note it's expensive for smaller teams” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.