Product information management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “product information management system”, and as “PIM for product catalog data”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Pimcore 22%
29Inriver PIM22Pimcore20Akeneo PIM29others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Inriver PIM held the lead, +2 points on 27%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Plytix74%Clear leader▼−10Since October 2026: 84% → 74%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Akeneo PIM33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Akeneo PIM (33%) replaces Plytix (34% then, 24% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Inriver PIM29%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Plytix74%Clear leader▼−10Since October 2026: 84% → 74%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketAkeneo PIM33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Akeneo PIM (33%) replaces Plytix (34% then, 24% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseInriver PIM29%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Inriver PIM29%19%59accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.27% → 29%
Inriver PIM29%19%59accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.27% → 29%02
Pimcore22%12%56accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 22%
Pimcore22%12%56accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 22%03Akeneo PIM20%23%65accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 25% → 20%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 20%
Akeneo PIM20%23%65accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 25% → 20%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 20%04
Informatica Product 3606%8%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
Informatica Product 3606%8%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%05
Stibo Systems STEP6%24%42accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 12% → 6%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 6%
Stibo Systems STEP6%24%42accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 12% → 6%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 6%06
Salsify2%25%56criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Salsify2%25%56criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%07
Syndigo2%22%36accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Syndigo2%22%36accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
Pimberly2%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Pimberly2%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Plytix0%38%16criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Plytix0%38%16criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
Sales Layer0%27%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Sales Layer0%27%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09Contentserv0%24%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Akeneo PIM vs Inriver PIMAkeneo PIM vs WISEPIMAkeneo PIM vs SalsifyPlytix vs PimcorePlytix vs Sales LayerPlytix vs Inriver PIMPlytix vs WISEPIMPlytix vs SalsifyPimcore vs Sales LayerPimcore vs Inriver PIMPimcore vs WISEPIMPimcore vs SalsifySales Layer vs Inriver PIMSales Layer vs WISEPIMSales Layer vs SalsifyInriver PIM vs WISEPIMInriver PIM vs SalsifyWISEPIM vs Salsify
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708C09
1011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Inriver PIM29%
Inriver PIM29%02Pimcore22%
Pimcore22%03Akeneo PIM20%
Akeneo PIM20%04Informatica Product 3606%
Informatica Product 3606%05Stibo Systems STEP6%
Stibo Systems STEP6%06Salsify2%
Salsify2%07Syndigo2%
Syndigo2%08Pimberly2%
Pimberly2%09Contentserv0%
10Sales Layer0%
Sales Layer0%11Plytix0%
Plytix0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Akeneo PIM23%
15 of 65 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“criticized heavily for requiring a dedicated engineering team to maintain. It is not recommended for large enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Salsify25%
14 of 56 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“large enterprises should be cautious about or avoid the following ... 1. Salsify - Issues: High per-user and per-SKU pricing, outdated and slow GUI” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Syndigo22%
8 of 36 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Syndigo (High Risk of Disappointment)... Data Reliability: Buyer interviews highlight persistent discrepancies” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Inriver PIM19%
11 of 59 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“2. inRiver - Issues: Limited scalability for large enterprises, lack of advanced features compared to competitors” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 954 links across 207 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 28 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Inriver43 answers · 84 citations · 14 models
32 answers · 54 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · WISEPIM26 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · AtroPIM26 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Pimcore20 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Plytix18 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Akeneo17 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra15 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best product information management system”, “product information management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inriver PIM inriver.com | 29% | 130 | 210 | 4 | 5,120 | 13 | ||
| Pimcore pimcore.com Pimcore 22%, Pimcore Enterprise Edition 2% | 24% | 155 | 880 | 22 | 4,825 | 0 | 2 | |
| Akeneo PIM akeneo.com Akeneo PIM 20%, Akeneo Product Cloud 0% | 20% | 167 | 480 | 15 | 33,435 | 13 | 5 | |
| Informatica informatica.com Informatica Product 360 6%, Informatica PIM 0% | 6% | 38 | 14,800 | 1,414 | 73,321 company | 120 | 7 | |
| Stibo Systems STEP stibosystems.com | 6% | 61 | 170 | 3 | 16,043 | $466 | 8 | |
| Salsify salsify.com | 2% | 117 | 18,100 | 817 | 70,138 | 14 | 9 | |
| Syndigo syndigo.com | 2% | 76 | 4,400 | 163 | 35,614 | $23 | 28 | |
| Pimberly pimberly.com | 2% | 36 | 390 | 2 | 14,005 | |||
| PIM-Plus™ pim-plus.com | 2% | 2 | ||||||
| PIMinto piminto.com | 2% | 10 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akeneo.com, pimcore.com, plytix.com). The first result for “best product information management system” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best product information management system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which PIM for product catalog data would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade product information management systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best product information management system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a product information management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which product information management systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAkeneo PIMChangedAkeneo PIMPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Salsify, Syndigono first choiceagainst: Contentserv, Inriver PIM, KatanaPIM, Pimcore, Salsify
Four alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPFive alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo, SyndigoTwo alternatives
OdooPIM, UnoPimGPT-5.4 miniStibo Systems STEPInriver PIMChangedInriver PIM, Stibo Systems STEPPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIMno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, SalsifyOne alternative
Akeneo PIMFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, SAP Master Data Governance, SalsifyOne alternative
Stibo Systems STEPGemini 3.5 FlashInriver PIMInformatica MDM Product 360ChangedAkeneo PIM, SalsifyPimcoreno first choiceagainst: Adobe Commerce (Magento) core product tables, Akeneo Community Edition, Catsy, Channable, ChannelAdvisor, DataFeedWatch, Jasper PIM, Pimcore Community Edition, Plytix, SAP Master Data Governance, Sales Layer, Shopify Plus native catalog
Five alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Contentserv, Inriver PIM, Pimcore Enterprise EditionFive alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Akeneo Enterprise Edition, ContentservPerplexity SonarInriver PIMPimcoreChangedAkeneo PIMPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPno first choiceagainst: AtroPIM, Censhare, Pimcore, Salsify, Syndigo
Five alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, Sales Layer, SalsifyFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, SyndigoSeven alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salesforce Product Information Management, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoOne alternative
PimberlyGrok 4.20Syndigoagainst: Plytix, Sales Layer, SalsifyInriver PIMChangedagainst: 1WorldSync, SyndigoAkeneo PIMPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIMno first choiceagainst: Pimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Catsy, Contentserv, IBM, Oracle PIM, Pimberly, Plytix
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Stibo Systems STEPThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimberly, PimcoreSix alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Bluestone PIM, PIM-Plus™Mistral SmallInformatica Product 360Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIMChangedInformatica PIMAkeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360no first choiceagainst: Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigo
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, SalsifyThree alternatives
Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoSeven alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Contentserv, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoOne alternative
PimcoreDeepSeek V4 FlashAkeneo PIM, Inriver PIMAkeneo PIMChangedInformatica Product 360against: Contentserv, SAP Master Data GovernancePimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Contentserv, Inriver PIM, Pimberly, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigo
Four alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPThree alternatives
Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPSeven alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Oracle Product Hub, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoOne alternative
PlytixLlama 4 MaverickAkeneo PIMInriver PIM, NovicellChangedno first choiceAkeneo PIMno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, WISEPIMTwo alternatives
Pimcore, PlytixQwen 3.7 FlashSalsifyAkeneo PIMChangedAkeneo PIMPimcoreno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigo
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Inriver PIM, SalsifyFour alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIMKimi K2Inriver PIMInriver PIMHeldagainst: Catsy, PlytixAkeneo PIMPimcore Enterprise Editionagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPno first choiceagainst: Catsy, Informatica Product 360, Plytix, Sales Layer
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, SalsifyThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Stibo Systems MDM/STEPFive alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, SyndigoOne alternative
PimberlyGLM 4.7 FlashXAkeneo PIM, Inriver PIMPimberly, Stibo Systems STEPChangedInformatica Product 360against: Stibo Systems STEPPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Syndigo
Three alternatives
Pimcore, Sales Layer, SalsifyThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, SalsifyOne alternative
PimberlyMiniMax M2.5no first choiceInriver PIM, PimcoreChangedAkeneo Product CloudPIMintono first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore
Three alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Contentserv, Salesforce Data CloudFour alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore Platform, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPTwo alternatives
PIM Layer, WISEPIMGPT-6 LunaInriver PIMStibo Systems STEPChangedno first choiceagainst: PimcorePimcoreagainst: Agility PIMno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, SAP Commerce
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, SalsifySix alternatives
Akeneo Product Cloud, Inriver PIM, Salesforce (Informatica) Product 360, Salsify PXM, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigo Product Experience CloudMuse Glimmer 30BAkeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIMInriver PIMChangedAkeneo PIMPIM-Plus™against: Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigo
Four alternatives
Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoOne alternative
Akeneo PIMSeven alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigo, WISEPIMThree alternatives
PIMinto, Pimcore, WISEPIMBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:06 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 2 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 22 | 210 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 82 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:20 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:24 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:53 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:14 | yes | 22 | 61 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 21 | 46 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 8 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 23 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:45 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 18 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 19 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 26 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:38 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:47 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:45 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:55 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 14 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 1 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:15 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 25 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 21 | 84 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 24 | 104 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akeneo read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Akeneo Product Cloud) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Community Edition) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Enterprise / Cloud Edition) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo Enterprise read as Akeneo PIM
InRiver read as Inriver PIM
InRiver (by Aprimo) read as Inriver PIM
Informatica read as Informatica Product 360
Informatica (Product 360) read as Informatica Product 360
Inriver read as Inriver PIM
Oracle read as Oracle Product Hub
SAP read as SAP Master Data Governance
Salesforce read as Salesforce Commerce Cloud
Stibo Systems read as Stibo Systems STEP
Stibo Systems (STEP / Product Experience Data Cloud) read as Stibo Systems STEP
Stibo Systems (STEP PIM) read as Stibo Systems STEP
Stibo Systems (STEP Platform) read as Stibo Systems STEP
Stibo Systems (STEP) read as Stibo Systems STEP
inRiver read as Inriver PIM
inriver read as Inriver PIM
Unresolved, counted raw
Acquia
Adobe Commerce (Magento) core product tables
Akeneo Enterprise Edition
BitBag
Centric Software
Comestri PIM
DataFeedWatch
Informatica MDM Product 360
Informatica Master Data Management
Informatica-style MDM tools
Manufactured
Novicell
PIM Layer
Pimcore Enterprise Edition
Pimcore Platform
Pimlayer ENTERPRISE+
SAP Commerce
SAP Product Content Hub
Salesforce (Informatica) Product 360
Salesforce Product Information Management
Shopify Plus native catalog
Stibo Systems MDM/STEP
Syndigo Product Experience Cloud
VirtoCommerce
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.