Planhat vs Totango
One of fourteen models named Planhat first on the direct prompt; zero named Totango. Both were named by all fourteen models and Planhat carries 49 labels and Totango 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer success platforms page.
By framing
PlanhatFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTotango
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Planhat and Totango were named in the same answer 109 times, of the 187 answers naming Planhat and the 176 naming Totango. In those answers Totango took the first choice five times and Planhat six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Planhat Totango first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Planhat on the left and Totango on the right.The direct prompt
Planhat first, Totango an alternative
1 of 14 modelsTotango was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Planhat2%#6 of 9Totango2%#7 of 9Planhat10%#3 of 9Totango10%#2 of 9What the models said about Planhat
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Called "useless" in some threads, possibly due to rollout or fit, with complaints about it not delivering intended value.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve for customization... Some users report it as "useless"” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“ChurnZero or Planhat are generally considered the best balance of functionality and usability” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Mid-market companies wanting a balance of power and ease of use | 3–4 months | Strong admin experience, clean UX, and fast implementation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · alternative
“Flexible for mid-market, with strong analytics, segmentation, and growth tools. Scales to enterprise but starts simpler.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · alternative
What the models said about Totango
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid Totango if your team prioritizes ease of use and daily friction reduction over deep customization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Approach with caution—particularly problematic if you need reliable health scoring or fast support.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Totango has broad features in theory but consistent complaints about UX speed, bugs and slow support make it a risk” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Gainsight and Totango lead with depth, compliance, and flexibility.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Free / Freemium Option: Totango (Starter Plan)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.