November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Spend management platfor · November 2026 Edition

Spend management platforms

Asked as “spend management platform”, and as “all-in-one spend control software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
45%
Clear leader
45Ramp14BILL Spend & Expense07Airbase34others

45% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 44% → 45%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Ramp held the lead, +1 point on 44%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Ramp45%13%70endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 44% → 45%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.44% → 45%
02BILL Spend & Expense14%18%50accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 15% → 14%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.15% → 14%
03Airbase7%3%35accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 17% → 7%, −10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 7%
04Procurify5%3%34accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
05Brex5%17%42accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
06Spendesk5%6%31accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
07Zoho Expense5%0%14accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
08Expensify4%38%21criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
09Payhawk2%4%23accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
10Precoro2%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14SAP Concur0%43%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Coupa0%39%36criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13SAP Ariba0%38%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Navan0%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Ramp45%
02BILL Spend & Expense14%
03Airbase7%
04Procurify5%
05Brex5%
06Spendesk5%
07Zoho Expense5%
08Expensify4%
09Payhawk2%
10Precoro2%
11Navan0%
12Coupa0%
13SAP Ariba0%
14SAP Concur0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BILL Spend & Expense
18%
9 of 50 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Who Should Avoid It: Fast-moving companies that make frequent vendor payments and cannot afford payment processing holds” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Coupa
39%
14 of 36 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid Coupa unless you have dedicated IT staff to manage its complexity” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Ramp
13%
9 of 70 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Ramp offers a free core product, though some features like budget management and certain ERP integrations require a paid tier” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
SAP Concur
43%
10 of 23 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Who Should Avoid It: Startups, mid-market companies, and SMBs.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 802 links across 184 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

37 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zylo27 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 45 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Capterra25 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · BILL24 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Precoro18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ramp17 answers · 34 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Emburse16 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Spendesk15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Payhawk14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best spend management platform”, “spend management platform”, “spend management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Ramp ramp.com45%916246,00049,733770,056$13,5111203
BILL bill.com
BILL Spend & Expense 14%
14%3312,740,0001,063,0011,783,039 company$199,2311197
Airbase airbase.com7%14214,8005775,429
Procurify procurify.com5%2784,4004362,225$28214
Brex brex.com5%52460,5001,190328,914$12,238811
Spendesk spendesk.com5%981,0002224,6102
Zoho parent site
Zoho Expense 5%
5%1945,40052
Expensify expensify.com4%24674,00093276,29101
Payhawk payhawk.com2%1062,400275,824213
Precoro precoro.com2%3411,000382,96686

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bill.com, g2.com, payhawk.com, ramp.com, spendesk.com). The first result for “best spend management platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best spend management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which all-in-one spend control software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top spend management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best spend management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a spend management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which spend management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Ramp
Three alternativesAirbase, Coupa, Procurify
FraxionChanged
Four alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp, Spendesk
Brex, Ramp
Seven alternativesAirbase, Coupa, Navan, Payhawk, Procurify, QuickBooks, Spendflo
BILL Spend & Expense
One alternativeZoho Expense
against: Ramp
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniRamp
Five alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Payhawk, Procurify, Rippling Spend
Payhawk, RampChanged
Two alternativesProcurify, Rippling Finance
against: Coupa
no first choiceBILL Spend & Expense
Two alternativesRamp, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Paychex, Pleo, Ramp, SAP Concur, Spendbase / SecureSpend, Xero
Gemini 3.5 FlashRamp
Four alternativesAirbase, Brex, Tipalti, Zip
against: Coupa, SAP Concur
RampHeld
Five alternativesAirbase, Brex, Payhawk, Spendesk, Zip
no first choice
Eight alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa, Navan, Ramp, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur
Ramp
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Zoho Expense
against: Expensify, SAP Concur
Brex, Ramp, Spendesk
Six alternativesAirbase, Coupa, Navan, SAP Concur, Tipalti, Zip
against: Expensify, SAP Ariba
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, SAP Concur
Perplexity SonarRamp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Payhawk, Procurify
against: Coupa
RampHeld
Five alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Payhawk, Procurify
Ramp
Seven alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa, Navan, Payhawk, SAP Concur, Spendesk
BILL Spend & Expense
Two alternativesPrecoro, Zoho Expense
against: Ramp
no first choiceagainst: Airbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa, Moss, Procurify, Ramp, SAP Concur, Spendesk
Grok 4.20Ramp
Four alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Procurify
against: Brex, Coupa, SAP Concur
RampHeld
Four alternativesAirbase, Brex, Procurify, Rho
against: Navan, SAP Concur
Coupa
Six alternativesBrex, Ivalua, Procurify, Ramp, SAP Ariba, Spendesk
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
no first choice
Three alternativesProcurify, Rho, Spendesk
against: Coupa, SAP Ariba
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Coupa, Expensify, Monarch Money, Payhawk, Spendesk
Mistral SmallAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense
Two alternativesProcureDesk, Spendesk
Brex, RampChanged
Three alternativesAirbase, Procurify, Rho
no first choiceagainst: SAP AribaBILL Spend & Expense, Zoho Expense
Two alternativesAirwallex, Expensify
no first choiceagainst: Monarch, Rocket Money, WalletHub, YNAB
DeepSeek V4 FlashRamp
Four alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Spendesk
RampHeld
Four alternativesAirbase, Brex, Navan, Payhawk
Ramp
Nine alternativesAirbase, Brex, Coupa, Ivalua, Navan, SAP Ariba, SAP Concur, Spendesk, Zip
against: Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Ramp
Three alternativesAirwallex, Spendesk, Zoho Expense
Brex, Ramp
Five alternativesAirbase, Pleo, Procurify, Soldo, Spendesk
against: Coupa, SAP Ariba
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Coupa, Expensify, Ramp, SAP Ariba, SAP Concur
Llama 4 MaverickAirbase
Three alternativesBrex, Procurify, Ramp
no first choiceChangedRamp
Two alternativesAirbase, Brex
BILL Spend & Expense
Three alternativesAirwallex, Brex, Ramp
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashRamp
Five alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, BrexBusiness, Rippling Spend, Sapling
against: Ariba, Coupa, Expensify
AirbaseChanged
Two alternativesProcurify, Ramp
SAP Ariba
Five alternativesCoupa, Navan, Precoro, Rho, Spendesk
Expensify
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Dext Prepare, Ramp, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa, EveryDollar, Honeydue, Navan, Pleo, Ramp, Rocket Money, SAP Concur, YNAB
Kimi K2Airbase, Ramp
Two alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Procurify
against: Brex
Procurify, RampChanged
Three alternativesAirbase, Payhawk, Precoro
Coupa
Nine alternativesAirbase, Brex, Ivalua, Payhawk, Precoro, Procurify, Ramp, SAP Ariba, Spendesk
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
Spendesk
Four alternativesPayhawk, Precoro, Procurify, Ramp
against: Coupa, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Ariba
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Corpay Complete, Coupa, Expensify, Navan, Ramp
GLM 4.7 FlashXProcurify
Six alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Coupa, Ramp, Spendesk, Tipalti
RampChanged
Eight alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Payhawk, Precoro, Procurify, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, Spendesk
Coupa, SAP Ariba
Ten alternativesAirwallex, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Emburse, Precoro, Procurify, Ramp, Rho, SAP Concur, Spendesk
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Four alternativesExpensify, Moss, Tradogram, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Corpay Spend Management
MiniMax M2.5Ramp
Three alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Procurify
Procurify, Rippling SpendChanged
Two alternativesPayhawk, Rho
no first choice
Nine alternativesBrex, Coupa, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, Pleo, Procurify, Ramp, SAP Ariba, Spendesk, Zip
Expensify
Three alternativesAirwallex, BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaRamp
Two alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Paylocity for Finance
RampHeld
Two alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex
Brex, Ramp
Six alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Coupa, Navan, Payhawk, Paylocity for Finance, SAP Concur
BILL Spend & Expense
Two alternativesRamp, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp, SAP Concur
Muse Glimmer 30BSpendesk
Six alternativesCoupa, Precoro, ProcureDesk, Procurify, SAP Concur, Vertice
Precoro, ProcureDeskChanged
Three alternativesAirbase, Navan, Procurify
Ramp
Nine alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa, Precoro, Procurify, Rippling Spend, SAP Ariba, SAP Concur
Ramp
Four alternativesAirwallex, Brex, Expensify Submit, Zoho Expense
against: Coupa, Precoro
no first choiceagainst: Expensify, Ramp, Weel
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:45yes158 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:29yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:37yes1025 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:48yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:17yes1531 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:25yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:28yes2222 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:58yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:42no033 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:27yes1430 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:41yes1351 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:47yes1445 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:42yes314 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:06yes1328 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:02yes109 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:39yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:25yes921 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:20yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:07yes524 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:38yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:06yes2433 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:17yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:44yes527 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:59yes1745 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:02yes1434 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:59yes846 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:28yes414 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:44yes1420 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:45yes108 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:07yes38 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:52no019 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:36yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:23yes536 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:46yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:57yes2342 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:52yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:08yes528 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:03yes1256 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:32yes1945 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:13yes1434 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:27yes831 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:59yes2238 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:51yes187 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:24yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:26no019 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:36yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:11yes528 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:53yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:50yes2422 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:48yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:46no028 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:09yes1033 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:11yes1567 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:32yes530 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:59yes312 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:13yes1422 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:52no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:00no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:23no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:03yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:11yes1434 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:37no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:56yes1829 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:20yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:05no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:38yes2130 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:34yes2034 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:42no048 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:18yes319 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:14no07 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:38yes199 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:53yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:45no017 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:22yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:08yes2439 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:41yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:42yes2231 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:17yes94 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:19yes1039 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:59yes2355 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:26yes2476 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:06no019 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:54yes217 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:52yes2425 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com (formerly Divvy) read as BILL Spend & Expense
Corpay read as Corpay Complete
Divvy read as BILL Spend & Expense
Divvy (by Tipalti) read as BILL Spend & Expense
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Oracle Fusion read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Oracle Procurement Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Paylocity read as Paylocity for Finance
Rippling read as Rippling Spend
Unresolved, counted raw
BrexBusiness
EveryDollar (Ramsey Solutions)
Expensify Submit
Honeydue
Monarch Money
Oracle Fusion Procurement
Sapling
Spendbase
Spendbase / SecureSpend
TechnologyAdvice
WalletHub
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Procure-to-payStrategic sourcing →