November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Expense management · November 2026 Edition

Expense management

Asked as “expense management software”, and as “employee expense reporting tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
31%
Contested · Zoho Expense 29%
31Ramp29Zoho Expense12Expensify27others

31% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−4Since October 2026: 35% → 31%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Ramp held the lead, −4 points on 35%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Ramp31%5%59endorsed leader▼−4Since October 2026: 35% → 31%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.35% → 31%
02Zoho Expense29%0%51accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 21% → 29%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.21% → 29%
03Expensify12%14%65accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 12%
04BILL Spend & Expense6%7%43accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
05Rippling Spend6%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
06Navan4%7%42accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
07Brex4%8%37accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
08Emburse2%15%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09SAP Concur2%43%47criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Rydoo0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Pleo0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Payhawk0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Ramp31%
02Zoho Expense29%
03Expensify12%
04BILL Spend & Expense6%
05Rippling Spend6%
06Navan4%
07Brex4%
08Emburse2%
09SAP Concur2%
10Payhawk0%
11Pleo0%
12Rydoo0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Concur
43%
20 of 47 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“it's often recommended to avoid unless you have a mandatory SAP ERP integration” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Expensify
14%
9 of 65 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Expensify, if your team relies on a very simple mobile workflow. Recent user reviews report that interface changes made submitting expenses more confusing” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
QuickBooks Online Expenses
50%
4 of 8 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Users report bad functionality, being unable to access customers or open invoices on the mobile app, and bad mileage tracking” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
BILL Spend & Expense
7%
3 of 43 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“the two I'd most strongly caution against based on user experiences” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 741 links across 182 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 6 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

28 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · BILL20 answers · 28 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Expensify20 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Capterra16 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ramp14 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Zoho13 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Spendesk12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best expense management software”, “expense management software”, “expense management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Ramp ramp.com31%916246,00049,733770,056$13,5111203
Zoho parent site
Zoho Expense 29%
29%1945,40052
Expensify expensify.com
Expensify 12%, Expensify Collect 0%
12%24674,00093276,29101
BILL bill.com
BILL Spend & Expense 6%
6%3312,740,0001,063,0011,783,039 company$199,231119
Rippling rippling.com
Rippling Spend 6%, Rippling Finance 0%
6%124301,00017,886712,399 company$42,013115
Navan navan.com4%329110,0001,342175,958$2,7161208
Brex brex.com4%52460,5001,190328,914$12,238813
Wave waveapps.com4%363368,000253,218708,86239
Emburse emburse.com2%7018,10024240,700$26651
SAP Concur sap.com2%41474,0005022,214,514$1,25123

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (ramp.com, spendesk.com). The first result for “best expense management software” is expensify.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best expense management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee expense reporting tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top expense management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best expense management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an expense management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which expense management tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Four alternativesAirbase, Paylocity, Rydoo, Spendesk
EmburseChanged
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Rydoo, Zoho Expense
no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Albert, Emburse Spend, Mint, PocketGuard, QuickBooks Online Expenses, QuickBooks Solopreneur
GPT-5.4 miniRamp
Four alternativesBrex, Navan, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur
Rippling SpendChanged
Two alternativesExpensify, Navan
no first choiceZoho Expense
One alternativeExpensify
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashRamp
Three alternativesAirbase, Brex, Navan
against: Emburse, Expensify, QuickBooks Online Expenses, SAP Concur
RampHeld
Three alternativesAirbase, Brex, Navan
against: SAP Concur
Brex, Ramp
Four alternativesExpensify, Fyle, Navan, SAP Concur
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Four alternativesExpensify, Fyle, Wave, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Excel/Google Sheets, Expensify, Ramp, SAP Concur
Perplexity SonarRamp
Seven alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, ITILITE, Navan, Rydoo, Spendesk, Zoho Expense
against: SAP Concur
ExpensifyChanged
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Ramp, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Ramp
Seven alternativesAirwallex, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Navan, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
against: Coupa Expense Management
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.20Ramp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Zoho Expense
against: SAP Concur
Zoho ExpenseChanged
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Navan, Ramp
against: SAP Concur
Ramp, Zoho Expense
Five alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Payhawk, SAP Concur
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesFreshBooks, QuickBooks Online Expenses, Wave
against: Expensify, SAP Concur
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa Expense Management, Expensify, Navan, SAP Concur, Tallie, Webexpenses
Mistral SmallBrex, Expensify, Ramp
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Rippling Spend
against: SAP Concur
NavanChanged
Three alternativesExpensify, Ramp, Zoho Expense
Zoho Expense
Nine alternativesExpensify, FreshBooks, Payhawk, QuickBooks Online Expenses, Ramp, Rippling Spend, Sage Intacct, Tradogram, Wave
Expensify, Zoho Expense
Two alternativesFreshBooks, Wave
against: QuickBooks Online Expenses
no first choiceagainst: Brex, Expensify, Ramp, SAP Concur
DeepSeek V4 FlashRamp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Zoho Expense
ExpensifyChanged
Two alternativesRamp, Zoho Expense
against: SAP Concur
no first choice
Seven alternativesBrex, Expensify, Navan, Payhawk, Ramp, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
BILL Spend & Expense
Four alternativesBrex, Expensify, Ramp, Zoho Expense
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Ramp
Three alternativesExpensify, Rippling Spend, Zoho Expense
against: SAP Concur
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Rydoo, SAP Concur, Webexpenses
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceZoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
no first choiceagainst: Expensify, QuickBooks Online Expenses
Qwen 3.7 FlashRippling Spend
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Ramp
SAP ConcurChanged
Four alternativesBrex, Expensify, Ramp, Zoho Expense
BILL Spend & Expense
Six alternativesAirbase, Expensify, Navan, Pleo, Ramp, Spendesk
against: SAP Concur
Expensify, Ramp, Zoho Expense
Two alternativesPleo, QuickBooks Online Expense
no first choiceagainst: SAP Concuragainst: Coupa Expense Management, Emburse, Expensify, SAP Concur
Kimi K2Ramp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Zoho Expense
Ramp, Zoho ExpenseChanged
Two alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify
Expensify
Five alternativesBrex, Payhawk, Ramp, Spendesk, Zoho Expense
Wave, Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
no first choice
Four alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
against: SAP Concur
against: Expensify, Navan, SAP Concur
GLM 4.7 FlashXZoho Expense
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Ramp
against: SAP Concur
no first choiceChanged
Seven alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Navan, Ramp, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Brex, Ramp
Seven alternativesAirbase, Airwallex, Expensify, Navan, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
no first choiceagainst: ExpenseOnDemand, Ramp, Skovik, Timesheets.com, Veryfi, Weel
MiniMax M2.5Expensify, Ramp
Three alternativesNavan, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
RampChanged
Three alternativesExpensify, Navan, Zoho Expense
Expensify
Four alternativesBrex, Ramp, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Zoho Expense
One alternativeExpensify
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaRamp
Three alternativesBrex, Navan, SAP Concur
RampHeld
Two alternativesExpensify, Navan
no first choiceZoho Expense
Two alternativesExpensify Collect, Ramp
no first choiceagainst: Expensify, Navan, SAP Concur
Muse Glimmer 30BZoho Expense
Five alternativesBrex, Expensify, Navan, Ramp, SAP Concur
Navan, Rippling SpendChanged
Two alternativesExpensify, Ramp
Brex, Ramp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Wave, Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
no first choiceagainst: Mobills - Budget Planner, NerdWallet: Manage Your Money, Wallet: Budget Expense Tracker
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:07yes107 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:06yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:22yes1121 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:39yes105 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:17yes1233 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:45yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:59yes2327 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:52yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:42no028 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:08yes1426 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:14yes1491 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:04yes529 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:52yes413 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:02yes920 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:41yes109 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:04yes24 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:06no012 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:35yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:25yes525 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:35yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:34yes2231 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:38yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:43yes524 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:40yes920 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:46yes1032 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:37yes543 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:49yes313 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:37yes1230 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:15yes97 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:30yes49 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:48no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:00yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:10yes532 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:09yes58 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:40yes2026 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:49yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:41yes1039 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:33yes1036 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:14yes1434 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:19yes1557 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:27yes718 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:56yes1421 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:24no04 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:39yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:58no013 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:35yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:11yes526 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:43yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:24yes2518 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:59yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:46yes516 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:28yes915 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:17yes1319 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:06yes1040 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:07yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:09yes2429 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:21no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:58no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:28no021 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:52yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:08yes533 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:12no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:40yes1540 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:17yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:58yes527 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:25yes1568 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:32no027 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:38no09 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:18yes418 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:04yes1419 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:37yes1911 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:43yes57 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:29yes1526 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:49yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:24yes1024 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:10yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:04yes2526 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:45yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:25yes1031 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:23yes2558 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:19yes1564 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:43yes2552 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:36yes316 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:22yes2334 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com read as BILL Spend & Expense
Coupa read as Coupa Expense Management
Divvy read as BILL Spend & Expense
Divvy (by Bill.com) read as BILL Spend & Expense
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Expense read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Online read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
Rippling read as Rippling Spend
Sage Expense read as Sage Expense Management
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Unresolved, counted raw
Albert
ExpenseOnDemand
Expensya
Mobills - Budget Planner
Moneyspire
NerdWallet: Manage Your Money
PocketGuard
QuickBooks Online Expense
Skovik
Timesheets.com
Veryfi
Wallet: Budget Expense Tracker
Zappi
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Corporate travel managemProcure-to-pay →