7 categories · RankedExpensify
Expensify is spend management software for receipts and expenses, used by employees, employers, and accounting teams · expensify.com ↗
1 more
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Zoho Expense is first at 48%.
Ramp is first at 31%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
SAP Concur is first at 63%.
Why models recommend it
“1. Expensify – Starting at $5/user/month - Best for: Small teams needing basic expense tracking”MiniMax M2.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“rated 4.5/5 on Capterra; it has its quirks but far fewer "horror stories" than Divvy or Rydoo”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
“Choose Expensify if you want flexibility with existing cards and strong receipt scanning”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
“The Best Overall Value: Expensify ... widely considered the gold standard for usability”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Who Should Avoid It: Companies looking for transparent, predictable pricing models and high-touch customer support.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Avoid if you need robust integrations or reliable automation.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“I would recommend steering clear of it if you can.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Expensify, if your team relies on a very simple mobile workflow. Recent user reviews report that interface changes made submitting expenses more confusing”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Expensify, over the 281 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 230 | 69 | Compare → | |
| 161 | 49 | Compare → | |
| 158 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 144 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 127 | 25 | View → | |
| 84 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 49 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 0 | View → | |
| 34 | 1 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Expensify →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Expensify's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- employees, employers, and accounting teams
- Price stated
- Expensify is completely free to use as an individual. For companies, plans start at $5 per member.
- Starting price
- 5
- Free plan or trial
- free to use as an individual
- Integrations
- 45
- Customers named
- Brooklyn Nets, Roadtrippers, Philz, Aprio Cloud, Amesto, AccordCare, Aviv Clinics, Redmond Accounting
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 246 of the 281 answers that named Expensify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
495 of the 633 domain citations in answers naming Expensify came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 171 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 130 | 17 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2026-01-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2026-02-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2023-07-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2023-12-14 | ||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Best expense management software report or ebook
- 2026-09-23Expensify vs quickbooks report or ebook
- 2026-09-21Expensify september 2026 product update blog
- 2026-09-21Free personal finance software report or ebook
- 2026-09-18Ramp vs Brex vs Expensify vs Navan (2026) report or ebook
- 2026-09-17Corporate Credit Card Software Integration: Connect Your Existing Cards to Expensify report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page expensify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.