Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Spend management platfor › Airbase vs Expensify
Spend management platforms · November 2026 Edition

Airbase vs Expensify

Three of fourteen models named Airbase first on the direct prompt; zero named Expensify. Airbase was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Expensify by ten and Airbase carries 35 labels and Expensify 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Airbase

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

Expensify

criticized challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%38%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3521A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Airbase reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Ramp was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Ramp vs Airbase · Ramp vs Expensify · BILL Spend & Expense vs Airbase

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the spend management platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AirbaseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsExpensify
Direct301 against Expensify
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained021 against Expensify
Scale-constrained001 against Expensify
Negative001 against Airbase · 5 against Expensify
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Airbase and Expensify were named in the same answer forty times, of the 187 answers naming Airbase and the 281 naming Expensify. In those answers Expensify took the first choice five times and Airbase zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Airbase and Expensify stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Airbase Expensify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Airbase on the left and Expensify on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Airbase and Expensify stood in it.

Airbase first, Expensify not the choice

3 of 14 modelsExpensify was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense alternatives: ProcureDesk, Spendesk
Llama 4 MaverickAirbase alternatives: Brex, Procurify, Ramp
Kimi K2Airbase, Ramp alternatives: BILL Spend & Expense, Procurify

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Ramp alternatives: Airbase, Coupa, Procurify
Gemini 3.5 FlashRamp alternatives: Airbase, Brex, Tipalti, Zip
Grok 4.20Ramp alternatives: Airbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Procurify
DeepSeek V4 FlashRamp alternatives: Airbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Spendesk
Qwen 3.7 FlashRamp alternatives: Airbase, BILL Spend & Expense, BrexBusiness, Rippling Spend, Sapling
GLM 4.7 FlashXProcurify alternatives: Airbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Coupa, Ramp, Spendesk, Tipalti
MiniMax M2.5Ramp alternatives: Airbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Procurify

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniRamp alternatives: BILL Spend & Expense, Navan, Payhawk, Procurify, Rippling Spend
Perplexity SonarRamp alternatives: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Payhawk, Procurify
GPT-6 LunaRamp alternatives: BILL Spend & Expense, Paylocity for Finance
Muse Glimmer 30BSpendesk alternatives: Coupa, Precoro, ProcureDesk, Procurify, SAP Concur, Vertice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Airbase0%#10 of 14
Expensify0%#8 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Airbase leads by four points.
Airbase7%#3 of 14
Expensify4%#8 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Airbase2%#9 of 18
Expensify2%#10 of 18
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Airbase

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Airbase is now part of Paylocity, so evaluate product direction, support arrangements, contract terms, and migration implications before committing.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Best for End-to-End Finance Control: Airbase ... widely considered the most comprehensive "super app" for mid-market finance teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best spend management platform for a mid-market B2B company is Airbase” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Expensify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Who Should Avoid It: Companies looking for transparent, predictable pricing models and high-touch customer support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“I would recommend steering clear of it if you can.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“1. Expensify – Starting at $5/user/month - Best for: Small teams needing basic expense tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall Value: Expensify ... widely considered the gold standard for usability” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.