Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Spend management platfor › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Spend management platforms for small business buyers

Asked as “spend management platform”, and as “all-in-one spend control software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
55%
Clear leader
55Ramp24BILL Spend & Expense15Zoho Expense07others

55% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−3Since October 2026: 58% → 55%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Ramp held the lead, −3 points on 58%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Ramp55%9%74endorsed leader▼−3Since October 2026: 58% → 55%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.58% → 55%
02BILL Spend & Expense24%15%74accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 31% → 24%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.31% → 24%
03Zoho Expense15%8%24accepted challenger▲+13Since October 2026: 2% → 15%, +13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.2% → 15%
04Brex2%24%49accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
05Spendesk2%18%28accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
06Pleo2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Coupa0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14SAP Concur0%82%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Expensify0%20%40accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Procurify0%11%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Rippling Finance0%10%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
10Airbase0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Precoro0%4%25accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Airwallex0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Ramp55%
02BILL Spend & Expense24%
03Zoho Expense15%
04Brex2%
05Spendesk2%
06Pleo2%
07Precoro0%
08Expensify0%
09Procurify0%
10Airbase0%
11Airwallex0%
12Rippling Finance0%
13Coupa0%
14SAP Concur0%

What they warned about

Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Concur
82%
14 of 17 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Concur is a legacy enterprise tool built for global corporations... notoriously clunky, expensive, and difficult to set up.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
BILL Spend & Expense
15%
11 of 74 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“small businesses should be cautious about or avoid the following spend management platforms... Users frequently report integration issues” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Brex
24%
12 of 49 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Brex targets venture-backed startups and walked away from the small business market entirely in 2022, making it less suitable for bootstrapped small businesses.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Coupa
92%
12 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Enterprise-overkill solutions like Coupa (noted for being "clunky, insipid, and thoroughly confusing")” Kimi K2, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 780 links across 157 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

43 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G238 answers · 61 citations · 13 models
vendor site · BILL36 answers · 64 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Capterra29 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zylo23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ramp22 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Spendesk15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Expensify14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
publisher (Gane)13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best spend management platform”, “spend management platform”, “spend management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Ramp ramp.com55%916246,00049,733770,056$13,5111203
BILL bill.com
BILL Spend & Expense 24%
24%3312,740,0001,063,0011,783,039 company$199,2311197
Zoho parent site
Zoho Expense 15%
15%1945,40052
Brex brex.com2%52460,5001,190328,914$12,238811
Spendesk spendesk.com2%981,0002224,6102
Pleo pleo.io2%532,4001623,5930
Rippling rippling.com
Rippling Spend 2%, Rippling Finance 0%
2%124301,00017,886712,399 company$42,013115
Precoro precoro.com0%3411,000382,96686
Expensify expensify.com0%24674,00093276,29101
Procurify procurify.com0%2784,4004362,225$28214

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bill.com, g2.com, ramp.com, spendesk.com). The first result for “best spend management platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best spend management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which all-in-one spend control software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top spend management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best spend management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a spend management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which spend management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceBILL Spend & ExpenseChanged
Two alternativesBrex, Ramp
BILL Spend & Expense
Three alternativesAirbase, Expensify, Pleo
against: Zoho Expense
BILL Spend & Expense
Three alternativesExpensify, Ramp, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: Brex, Ramp
GPT-5.4 miniBILL Spend & Expense
Two alternativesBrex, Ramp
BILL Spend & Expense, RampChanged
Two alternativesAirbase, Brex
against: Expensify
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Four alternativesBrex, Expensify, Rippling Finance, Zoho Expense
against: Navan, Payhawk, Procurify, SAP Concur
BILL Spend & Expense, Zoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, ProSpend
Gemini 3.5 FlashRamp
Three alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex
RampHeld
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Rho
Ramp
Five alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Pleo, Spendesk
BILL Spend & Expense
Three alternativesBrex, Ramp, Zoho Expense
Brex, Ramp
Two alternativesAirbase, Navan
against: Expensify, SAP Concur
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa, Expensify, SAP Concur
Perplexity SonarRamp
Six alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Pleo, Precoro, Procurify, Spendesk
against: Expensify
BILL Spend & ExpenseChanged
Five alternativesExpensify, Precoro, Procurify, Ramp, Spendesk
BILL Spend & Expense
Seven alternativesBrex, Expensify, Navan, Pleo, Ramp, Spendesk, Zoho Expense
Zoho Expense
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Precoro, Ramp
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa, Procurify, Ramp, SAP Ariba, SAP Concur, Spendesk
Grok 4.20Ramp
Six alternativesAirwallex, BILL Spend & Expense, Precoro, Procurify, Rippling Finance, Spendesk
RampHeld
Two alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Rippling Finance
against: Brex
Ramp
Four alternativesBrex, Precoro, Procurify, Spendesk
against: Coupa, Ivalua, SAP Ariba
Zoho Expense
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, ExpensePoint, Ramp, Rippling Spend
against: Coupa, SAP Concur
Ramp
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Rippling Spend
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Melio
Mistral SmallRamp
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Precoro
RampHeld
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Precoro
Ramp
Five alternativesAirwallex, ExpensePoint, Precoro, Spendesk, Team Procure
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Rippling Finance, Zoho Expense
DeepSeek V4 FlashBILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
One alternativeBrex
RampChanged
One alternativeBILL Spend & Expense
against: Brex
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Three alternativesAirwallex, Brex, Spendesk
against: Emburse
Ramp
One alternativeZoho Expense
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Three alternativesBrex, Expensify, Pleo
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Intuit QuickBooks, Ramp, SAP Concur, Spendesk
Llama 4 MaverickRamp
Two alternativesPrecoro, Procurify
RampHeld
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Precoro, Rippling Finance
Precoro
Five alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Procurify, Ramp
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Precoro, Ramp
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Ramp
Qwen 3.7 FlashRamp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Precoro, Spendesk
BILL Spend & ExpenseChanged
One alternativeRamp
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Three alternativesPrecoro, Spendesk, Team Procure
against: Coupa
Rippling Spend
Three alternativesEnvoice, FreshBooks, Ramp
against: Navan, SAP Concur
Pleo
Five alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Navan, Ramp
against: Ariba, Coupa
against: Coupa, SAP Concur
Kimi K2BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Four alternativesBrex, Expensify, Precoro, Procurify
BILL Spend & Expense, RampHeldagainst: BrexBILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Five alternativesAirwallex, Brex, Pleo, Spendesk, Zoho Expense
Ramp, Zoho Expense
Two alternativesExpensify, Rippling Spend
Ramp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Payhawk, Pleo
against: Coupa, SAP Concur
against: Brex, Coupa, Mercury, SAP Concur
GLM 4.7 FlashXRamp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Precoro, Procurify
RampHeld
Five alternativesAirbase, BILL Spend & Expense, Pleo, Precoro, Spendesk
Brex, Ramp
Four alternativesAirwallex, Expensify, Spendesk, Zoho Expense
Zoho Expense
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp, Rippling Spend
no first choiceagainst: Coupa, SAP Concuragainst: Coupa, Ivalua, Navan, Ramp, SAP Concur, Spendesk
MiniMax M2.5Ramp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Rippling Spend, Spendesk
SpendeskChanged
One alternativeBILL Spend & Expense
against: Airbase
Airwallex, Ramp
Three alternativesPrecoro, Procurify, Spendesk
Ramp
Two alternativesPEX, Zoho Expense
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, SAP Concur
GPT-6 LunaRamp
Two alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex
RampHeld
One alternativeBILL Spend & Expense
Ramp
Four alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Zoho Expense
Ramp
One alternativeBILL Spend & Expense
no first choice
Two alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
against: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Ramp, SAP Concur
Muse Glimmer 30BBILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Three alternativesBrex, Precoro, Procurify
RampChanged
Five alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Pleo, Precoro, Procurify, Spendesk
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Three alternativesAirbase, Brex, Pleo
against: Spendesk
Zoho Expense
Three alternativesBILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp
against: Coupa, Precoro
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Ramp, Spendesk
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:35no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:20yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:06yes1021 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:53yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:21yes524 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:46yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:22yes2019 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:28yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:41yes1545 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:05yes536 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:19yes1519 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:47yes1021 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:48yes413 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:34yes1119 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:41yes188 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:49yes55 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:32yes724 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:34yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:29yes523 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:35yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:19yes2220 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:29yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:47no028 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:17yes1525 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:39yes1038 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:54no090 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:22yes317 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:52yes1219 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:26yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:45yes38 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:20yes1324 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:06yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:15yes942 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:08yes55 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:40yes2224 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:32yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:51yes528 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:59yes1061 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:47yes15136 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:08yes515 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:05yes522 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:39yes2346 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:52yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:58yes24 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:50yes817 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:16yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes526 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:25yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:42yes2216 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:38yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:11yes528 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:14yes1537 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:33yes870 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:43yes1436 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:44yes212 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:58yes1415 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:34no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:56no04 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:36no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:10yes107 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes1030 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:46no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:52yes1922 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:32yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:37yes521 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:23yes1526 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:34yes1322 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:29no085 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:24yes315 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:54yes1423 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:02yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:16yes36 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:47yes920 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:18yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:29yes931 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:14yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:49yes2440 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:28yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:39yes1538 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:42yes2523 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:01yes2365 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:20yes2552 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:42yes420 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:20yes1325 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL read as BILL Spend & Expense
BILL (BILL Spend & Expense) read as BILL Spend & Expense
BILL (formerly Bill.com) read as BILL Spend & Expense
BILL.com read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com (or Bill) read as BILL Spend & Expense
Divvy read as BILL Spend & Expense
Divvy (by Bill.com) read as BILL Spend & Expense
Divvy (by SmartSuite) read as BILL Spend & Expense
Paylocity read as Paylocity for Finance
Rippling read as Rippling Spend
Unresolved, counted raw
Extend
QuickBooks built-in tools
Zaggle
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Procure-to-payStrategic sourcing →