Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Telecom expense mgmt › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Telecom expense management for small business buyers
Asked as “telecom expense management platform”, and as “wireless and telecom bill management service”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · Lightyear 9%
35Genuity09Lightyear09Temforce46others
35% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Genuity held the lead, −1 point on 36%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Genuity35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
vCom Solutions18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: vCom Solutions (18%) replaces Genuity (19% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Tangoe One Telecom53%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →
Genuity35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketvCom Solutions18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: vCom Solutions (18%) replaces Genuity (19% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseTangoe One Telecom53%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Genuity35%0%35endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.36% → 35%
Genuity35%0%35endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.36% → 35%02
Lightyear9%0%25accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.14% → 9%
Lightyear9%0%25accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.14% → 9%03
Temforce9%0%10accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 9%
Temforce9%0%10accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 9%04Mobil7%0%12accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
05ExpenseLogic6%0%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
06
Zoho Expense4%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Zoho Expense4%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%07vCom Solutions4%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
vCom Solutions4%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%08
Brightfin2%0%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Brightfin2%0%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09Microcall2%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10LINQ Qonnect2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Datagate2%44%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Sakon0%100%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Sakon0%100%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15Tangoe One Telecom0%83%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tangoe One Telecom0%83%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Calero0%80%25criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Calero0%80%25criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12vManager0%10%10accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
vCom Solutions vs LINQ QonnectvCom Solutions vs TemforcevCom Solutions vs LightyearvCom Solutions vs SakonBrightfin vs GenuityBrightfin vs ExpenseLogicBrightfin vs LINQ QonnectBrightfin vs TemforceBrightfin vs LightyearBrightfin vs SakonGenuity vs ExpenseLogicGenuity vs LINQ QonnectGenuity vs TemforceGenuity vs LightyearGenuity vs SakonExpenseLogic vs LINQ QonnectExpenseLogic vs TemforceExpenseLogic vs LightyearExpenseLogic vs SakonLINQ Qonnect vs TemforceLINQ Qonnect vs LightyearLINQ Qonnect vs SakonTemforce vs LightyearTemforce vs SakonLightyear vs Sakon
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203M04
E05
060708M09
L10
D11
v12
131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Genuity35%
Genuity35%02Lightyear9%
Lightyear9%03Temforce9%
Temforce9%04Mobil7%
05ExpenseLogic6%
06Zoho Expense4%
Zoho Expense4%07vCom Solutions4%
vCom Solutions4%08Brightfin2%
Brightfin2%09Microcall2%
10LINQ Qonnect2%
11Datagate2%
12vManager0%
13Sakon0%
Sakon0%14Calero0%
Calero0%15Tangoe One Telecom0%
Tangoe One Telecom0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tangoe One Telecom83%
30 of 36 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Tangoe One Telecom - due to its legacy architecture that requires significant manual data entry during implementation, which can be problematic for small to mid-sized companies.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Calero80%
20 of 25 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Calero is described as a complex database that is not "set-it-and-forget-it."... less suitable for small businesses with limited resources” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Sakon100%
15 of 15 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“designed for large multinational organizations ... users report manual validation work to keep data accurate, with high costs” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Datagate
44%
8 of 18 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid If Budget Is Tight | Datagate | $300/month | Built more for MSPs” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 934 links across 156 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 39 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
50 answers · 85 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Capterra49 answers · 80 citations · 14 models
vendor site · GetApp48 answers · 95 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G229 answers · 54 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra17 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Sourceforge16 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
16 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GetApp16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
44 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 9 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genuity gogenuity.com | 35% | 52 | 4,400 | 189 | 1,691 | 0 | |
| Lightyear lightyear.ai | 9% | 64 | 33,100 | 17,745 | 33,552 | 22 | 4 |
| Temforce temforce.com | 9% | 26 | 20 | 0 | 92 | ||
| Mobil | 7% | ||||||
| ExpenseLogic | 6% | 10 | 0 | ||||
| Zoho parent site Zoho Expense 4% | 4% | 194 | 5,400 | 52 | |||
| vCom Solutions vcomsolutions.com | 4% | 30 | 260 | 4 | 263 | ||
| OneBill onebillsoftware.com | 4% | 17 | |||||
| Brightfin brightfin.com | 2% | 109 | 720 | 1 | 138 | 8 | |
| Microcall microcall.com | 2% | 26 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (uplandsoftware.com). The first result for “best telecom expense management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which wireless and telecom bill management service would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top telecom expense management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a telecom expense management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which telecom expense management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GenuityDatagate, MobilityCentral, Telgoo5ChangedGenuityGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero-MDSL, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Workday Financial Management
One alternative
ExpensifyTwo alternatives
T-Mobile Business Wireless Expense Management Support, Verizon Business Mobile Expense ManagementThree alternatives
Brightfin, Tellennium, vCom SolutionsGPT-5.4 miniGenuity, LightyearvCom SolutionsChangedExpenseLogicagainst: vManagerWinBillagainst: SpikeFli Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Asignet, Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Upland Cimpl
Two alternatives
Brightfin, TellenniumTwo alternatives
Expertel iQ, OneBillFive alternatives
Brightfin, LINQ Qonnect, Motus, OneBill, SpikeFli AnalyticsOne alternative
ClearviewGemini 3.5 FlashLightyearagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomvCom SolutionsChangedagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomLightyearagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomLightyearagainst: Calero, Cass, Tangoe One TelecomRipplingagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecomagainst: Calero, Cass Information Systems, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Four alternatives
Brightfin, Genuity, vCom Solutions, zLinqThree alternatives
Lightyear, RadiusPoint, Wireless WatchdogsSix alternatives
Expensify, Mindglobal, RadiusPoint, Ramp, Valicom, vCom SolutionsFour alternatives
Expensify, Genuity, Ramp, vCom SolutionsThree alternatives
Brex, Lightyear, RampPerplexity SonarGenuityagainst: Cimpl, Tangoe One TelecomLINQ QonnectChangedagainst: DatagateGenuityagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomLightyearagainst: Calero, Cimpl, Tangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Calero-MDSL, DMI, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Tellennium, Upland Cimpl, vCom Solutions
Three alternatives
ClearSight TEMs, ExpenseLogic, LightyearTwo alternatives
SutiWEM, WinBillSeven alternatives
Brightfin, ClearSight, Clearview, ExpenseLogic, Lightyear, Motus, vManagerThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Expensify, GenuityGrok 4.20Genuityagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomGenuityHeldagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomBrightfinagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, WidePointMobilagainst: Datagateno first choiceagainst: Tangoe One Telecomagainst: Billingbooth, Datagate, Kloudville, NetPlus Telecommunications Expense Management, OneBill, Sakon, SutiWEM, Tangoe TEM, Vigilis, WinBill
Two alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogicThree alternatives
Lightyear, Mobil, TemforceFour alternatives
ExpenseLogic, LINQ Qonnect, Mobil, TemforceOne alternative
ExpenseLogicMistral SmallGenuityGenuity, LightyearChangedBrightfin, ExpenseLogic, Genuity, LINQ Qonnect, MicrocallGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Lightyear, vManagerThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Motus, Tangoe One TelecomTwo alternatives
Datagate, LightyearTwo alternatives
ExpenseLogic, MicrocallDeepSeek V4 FlashGenuityExpenseLogicChangedagainst: WinBillBrightfin, ExpenseLogic, Microcallagainst: Tangoe One TelecomTemforceagainst: Calero, OneBill, Tangoe One Telecom, TellenniumMobile X Suiteagainst: Tangoe One Telecomagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Two alternatives
ExpenseLogic, LightyearTwo alternatives
Datagate, TellenniumTwo alternatives
Datagate, MotusThree alternatives
Mobil(X) Suite, Vigilis, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
Brightfin, Cimpl, TemforceLlama 4 MaverickGenuityno first choiceChangedGenuityGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Four alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Lightyear, Zoho Expense, vManagerOne alternative
LightyearThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Microcall, WidePointQwen 3.7 FlashExpenseLogic, Genuityagainst: Datagate, Tangoe One TelecomMobilChangedExpenseLogic, Mobilagainst: Datagate, Tangoe One TelecomZoho ExpenseGenuityagainst: Convergys/Allegro, Datagate, Tangoe One Telecom, WidePoint, vantage Circle
Two alternatives
Brightfin, MotusTwo alternatives
ResalePartners, WidePointThree alternatives
Brightfin, LINQ Qonnect, MicrocallTwo alternatives
ExpenseLogic, TemforceThree alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, MicrocallKimi K2Genuity IT Admin SuiteGenuityChangedGenuityMobil, Temforceagainst: Datagate, OneBillno first choiceagainst: Calero, Cass, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Brightfin, Mobil, TemforceThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Lightyear, zLinqFive alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, Mobil, Sakon TEM, Tangoe One TelecomTwo alternatives
Fibi B2B, MicrocallGLM 4.7 FlashXBrightfinOneBillChangedMobilTemforceno first choiceagainst: Tangoe TEM
Three alternatives
ExpenseLogic, LINQ Qonnect, MotusThree alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, WinBillFour alternatives
Brightfin, Datagate, Microcall, MotusThree alternatives
Mindglobal, Mobil, Zoho ExpenseMiniMax M2.5GenuityExpenseLogic, OneBillChangedExpenseLogicagainst: Tangoe One TelecomTemforce, Zoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, vCom vManagerTwo alternatives
Mobil, TimelyBillTwo alternatives
Datagate, MicrocallTwo alternatives
Datagate, MicrocallGPT-6 LunaVigilisRadiusPoint's ExpenseLogicChangedGenuityagainst: Tangoe or Calero, Upland CimplGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
One alternative
LightyearOne alternative
TRAK CommunicationsThree alternatives
Lightyear, vCom Solutions, vManagerMuse Glimmer 30BMicrocall, Temforceagainst: DatagateGenuityChangedMicrocall, Mobil(X) SuiteGenuity, Mobilno first choiceagainst: Calero, Granite Telecommunications, Tangoe One Telecom, Tangoe TEM, vCom Solutions
Two alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Mobil(X) SuiteTwo alternatives
Lightyear, vManagerSix alternatives
Brightfin, Datagate, ExpenseLogic, MobilityCentral, Motus, OneBillBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 12 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 18 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 23 | 147 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 19 | 57 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 15 | 66 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 20 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 72 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 17 | 71 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 7 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 21 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 21 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 13 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:57 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:26 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:41 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:25 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Lightyear.ai read as Lightyear
Tangoe read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One read as Tangoe One Telecom
vCom read as vCom Solutions
Unresolved, counted raw
AT&T Premier
Apple Business Manager
Boostforce
BroadSoft
Cognosos
Convergys/Allegro
Expertel iQ
Granite Telecommunications
Jamf
Mobile X Suite
NetPlus Telecommunications Expense Management
ResalePartners
RingCentral/Zoom Phone
Rippling IT
SimpleMDM
Soroco Scout
T-Mobile Business Wireless Expense Management Support
TRAK Communications
Tangoe or Calero
Tekton Billing
Telgoo5
Tessco
TimelyBill
Vcomz
Verizon Business Mobile Expense Management
Verizon Wireless Portal
Verizon or AT&T business portals
Visage
ZOEY
vantage Circle
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.