Telecom expense management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “telecom expense management platform”, and as “wireless and telecom bill management service”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53Tangoe One Telecom06Sakon06Upland Cimpl35others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Tangoe One Telecom held the lead, +11 points on 42%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Genuity35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
vCom Solutions18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: vCom Solutions (18%) replaces Genuity (19% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Tangoe One Telecom53%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.This page
Genuity35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketvCom Solutions18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: vCom Solutions (18%) replaces Genuity (19% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseTangoe One Telecom53%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Tangoe One Telecom53%17%64endorsed leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.42% → 53%
Tangoe One Telecom53%17%64endorsed leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.42% → 53%02
Sakon6%8%51accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 6%
Sakon6%8%51accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 6%03
Upland Cimpl6%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
Upland Cimpl6%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%04
Calero4%11%44accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 12% → 4%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 4%
Calero4%11%44accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 12% → 4%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 4%05
Mindglobal4%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Mindglobal4%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06Cimpl4%9%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
07
Tellennium4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Tellennium4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
Lightyear2%10%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Lightyear2%10%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Calero-MDSL0%29%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09
Brightfin0%7%43accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Brightfin0%7%43accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10Cass Information Systems0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11ExpenseLogic0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
vCom Solutions vs LINQ QonnectvCom Solutions vs TemforcevCom Solutions vs LightyearvCom Solutions vs SakonBrightfin vs GenuityBrightfin vs ExpenseLogicBrightfin vs LINQ QonnectBrightfin vs TemforceBrightfin vs LightyearBrightfin vs SakonGenuity vs ExpenseLogicGenuity vs LINQ QonnectGenuity vs TemforceGenuity vs LightyearGenuity vs SakonExpenseLogic vs LINQ QonnectExpenseLogic vs TemforceExpenseLogic vs LightyearExpenseLogic vs SakonLINQ Qonnect vs TemforceLINQ Qonnect vs LightyearLINQ Qonnect vs SakonTemforce vs LightyearTemforce vs SakonLightyear vs Sakon
One product takes 53% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tangoe One Telecom17%
11 of 64 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Tangoe One Telecom is mentioned as a platform to avoid or be highly cautious about due to issues such as invoice upload delays of up to 3 weeks.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Calero11%
5 of 44 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“caution if your needs emphasize cutting-edge AI, flawless scalability for 10k+ devices, or if internal vendor health matters” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Sakon8%
4 of 51 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Also received a high negative rating (80%) and is similarly flagged for issues that could impact reliability” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Calero-MDSL
29%
4 of 14 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“criticized for high costs and complexity, especially under pricing models that charge a percentage of total telecom spend” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 975 links across 177 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 39 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Capterra41 answers · 66 citations · 13 models
35 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
33 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
vendor site · GetApp27 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mindglobal25 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow25 answers · 25 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Socium IT24 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Tellennium21 answers · 44 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sakon17 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 12 models
33 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 13 models
25 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tangoe One Telecom tangoe.com | 53% | 134 | 0 | 3,425 | $63,203 | 6 | 2 | |
| Sakon sakon.com | 6% | 85 | 1,000 | 196 | 583 | 2 | 3 | |
| Upland Cimpl uplandsoftware.com | 6% | 25 | 10 | 0 | 67,149 | $1,203 | 26 | 6 |
| Calero calero.com | 4% | 93 | 3,600 | 296 | 1,930 | $4,743 | 14 | |
| Mindglobal mindglobal.com | 4% | 24 | 210 | 2 | 167 | 9 | ||
| Cimpl | 4% | 110 | 1 | |||||
| Tellennium tellennium.com | 4% | 25 | 320 | 1 | 709 | 14 | 6 | |
| Vigilis vigilis.io | 4% | 13 | 70 | 27 | 0 | |||
| Lightyear lightyear.ai | 2% | 64 | 33,100 | 17,745 | 33,552 | 22 | 4 | |
| Stratix stratixcorp.com | 2% | 7 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, mindglobal.com, sakon.com, tellennium.com, uplandsoftware.com). The first result for “best telecom expense management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best telecom expense management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which wireless and telecom bill management service would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade telecom expense management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a telecom expense management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which telecom expense management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Tangoe One TelecomMindglobalChangedTangoe One TelecomTangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Brightfin, Sakon, Upland CimplTwo alternatives
Calero-MDSL, Tangoe One TelecomFive alternatives
Asignet, Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Lightyear, SakonTwo alternatives
Calero, SakonGPT-5.4 miniSakon, Tangoe One TelecomTangoe One TelecomChangedCalero, Tangoe One TelecomSakon, Tangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Asignet, Cimpl, Lightyear, Management of Things / Tellennium, Valicom Clearview
Two alternatives
Brightfin, Tellennium MoTThree alternatives
Calero, RadiusPoint, Valicom ClearviewTwo alternatives
Brightfin, SakonOne alternative
BrightfinGemini 3.5 FlashCalero, Tangoe One TelecomTangoe One TelecomChangedTangoe One TelecomTangoe One TelecomCalero, Tangoe One Telecomagainst: Expensify, Lightyear
Three alternatives
Brightfin, Cass Information Systems, SakonFour alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Cass Information Systems, SakonFive alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Cass Information Systems, Lightyear, SakonThree alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, SakonTwo alternatives
Brightfin, SakonPerplexity SonarTangoe One TelecomTangoe One TelecomHeldCalero, Tangoe One TelecomUpland Cimplno first choiceagainst: Apptio, Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, ComSci, Genuity, MOBI, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Zylo, vCom Solutions
Five alternatives
Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Lightyear, Sakon, Upland CimplFour alternatives
Calero-MDSL, Cass Information Systems, Sakon, WidePointFour alternatives
Brightfin, Cass Information Systems, Sakon, Upland CimplFour alternatives
Brightfin, Lightyear, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomGrok 4.20Mindglobalagainst: Microcall, MobilTangoe One TelecomChangedTangoe One TelecomLightyearno first choiceagainst: Brightfin, Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Four alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Lightyear, Tangoe One TelecomFour alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Cass Information Systems, SakonFour alternatives
Calero, Cimpl, Sakon, TellenniumFive alternatives
Calero, Mindglobal, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, VigilisMistral SmallUpland CimplTangoe One TelecomChangedLightyearVigilisno first choiceagainst: Calero-MDSL, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Five alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Management of Things by Tellennium, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomTwo alternatives
Calero, SakonFour alternatives
Calero, ExpenseLogic, TailWind, TemforceTwo alternatives
Brightfin, WidePointDeepSeek V4 FlashTangoe One TelecomTangoe One TelecomHeldTangoe One TelecomTangoe One Telecom, Tellenniumagainst: Vigilisno first choiceagainst: Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, SakonTwo alternatives
Brightfin, MobilSix alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Mindglobal, Sakon, Upland Cimpl, vCom SolutionsTwo alternatives
Calero, TemforceLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceTangoe One TelecomChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Calero, ExpenseLogic, SakonQwen 3.7 FlashCalero Solutions, Tangoe One TelecomAtriumChangedMindglobal, Tangoe One TelecomTangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Tangoe One Telecom
Five alternatives
Brightfin, Cass Information Systems, Mindglobal, Mobil, SakonFour alternatives
Conductor, EY, Genpact, KPMGFour alternatives
Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Cass Information Systems, SakonFour alternatives
Calero-MDSL, Cimpl, Mindglobal, VigilisKimi K2Cimpl, Tangoe One TelecomTangoe One TelecomChangedagainst: Cass Information SystemsTangoe One TelecomStratix, Upland Cimplno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Two alternatives
Brightfin, CaleroThree alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, SakonSix alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Cass Information Systems, Sakon, Tellennium, zLinqTwo alternatives
Sakon, vCom vManagerGLM 4.7 FlashXTangoe One TelecomTellenniumChangedCimpl, Tangoe One TelecomVigilisno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom, WorldWide Technology
Two alternatives
Brightfin, CimplThree alternatives
Arcadia, DMI, TemforceNine alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Cass Information Systems, Datagate, ExpenseLogic, Lightyear, Mindglobal, Mobil, SakonFour alternatives
Brightfin, Cimpl, Lightyear, Tangoe One TelecomMiniMax M2.5Cimplagainst: TemforceRadiusPoint, Tangoe One TelecomChangedCimpl, Tangoe One TelecomLINQ Qonnect, Stratix Telecom Expense Managementno first choiceagainst: Your telecom carrier's native TEM toolsagainst: Calero-MDSL, Tangoe One Telecom
Four alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, Lightyear, Tangoe One TelecomFour alternatives
Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Mindglobal, SakonFive alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Lightyear, Sakon, TellenniumTwo alternatives
Tangoe One Telecom, Upland CimplGPT-6 LunaSakonTangoe One TelecomChangedno first choiceTangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Tangoe One TelecomTwo alternatives
Calero, SakonEight alternatives
Asignet, Brightfin, Calero, Mindglobal, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Tellennium Management of Things, Upland CimplTwo alternatives
Brightfin, SakonMuse Glimmer 30BTangoe One TelecomUpland Tangoe's Tangoe One TelecomChangedCalero, Tangoe One TelecomTangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe TEM
Four alternatives
Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Sakon, VigilisTwo alternatives
Calero, Upland CimplThree alternatives
Brightfin, Sakon, Upland Software / CimplThree alternatives
Calero, Calero-MDSL, CimplBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:32 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 16 | 15 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 17 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 25 | 80 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 18 | 49 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 14 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 11 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:45 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:10 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 14 | 65 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:24 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 24 | 78 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 22 | 78 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 25 | 80 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Tangoe read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (One Platform) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (Tangoe One Telecom) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (Tangoe One) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (now an Oracle company) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One (Tangoe TEM) read as Tangoe One Telecom
vCom read as vCom Solutions
vCom (vManager) read as vCom Solutions
Unresolved, counted raw
Aparavi
Asignet or Clearview
Atrium
CGI Inc.
Calero Solutions
Calvi
Conductor (Tempest)
Cwira
Genpact
Genuity or WidePoint
Indus Telecom
LINQ
Management of Things / Tellennium
Management of Things by Tellennium
Microland
Mobilise
Mytem360
NTT DATA / Dimension Data
Optery
Stratix Telecom Expense Management
Tangoe MMS
Tellennium MoT
Upland Software / Cimpl
Upland Tangoe's Tangoe One Telecom
Verba
Vodafone Group Plc / Vodafone Business
Vodafone or AT&T Managed TEM Services
WorldWide Technology
Your telecom carrier's native TEM tools
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.