Telecom expense management
Asked as “telecom expense management platform”, and as “wireless and telecom bill management service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
18%
Contested · Brightfin 14%
18vCom Solutions14Brightfin14Genuity54others
18% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: vCom Solutions (18%) replaces Genuity (19% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.vCom Solutions leads at 18%, replacing Genuity, which led at 19% and stands at 14% now: 4 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Genuity35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
vCom Solutions18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: vCom Solutions (18%) replaces Genuity (19% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageEnterprise
Tangoe One Telecom53%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →
Genuity35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketvCom Solutions18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: vCom Solutions (18%) replaces Genuity (19% then, 14% now), 4 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageEnterpriseTangoe One Telecom53%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 42% → 53%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01vCom Solutions18%6%17accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 12% → 18%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 18%
vCom Solutions18%6%17accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 12% → 18%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 18%02
Brightfin14%10%42accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 4% → 14%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 14%
Brightfin14%10%42accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 4% → 14%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 14%03Genuity14%7%15accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 19% → 14%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.19% → 14%
Genuity14%7%15accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 19% → 14%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.19% → 14%04ExpenseLogic7%0%33accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
05LINQ Qonnect4%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
06
Temforce4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Temforce4%0%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%07
Lightyear2%0%19accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 15% → 2%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.15% → 2%
Lightyear2%0%19accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 15% → 2%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.15% → 2%08
Sakon2%23%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Sakon2%23%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%09
Calero2%39%28criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Calero2%39%28criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%10Tangoe One Telecom2%46%37criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Tangoe One Telecom2%46%37criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
vCom Solutions vs LINQ QonnectvCom Solutions vs TemforcevCom Solutions vs LightyearvCom Solutions vs SakonBrightfin vs GenuityBrightfin vs ExpenseLogicBrightfin vs LINQ QonnectBrightfin vs TemforceBrightfin vs LightyearBrightfin vs SakonGenuity vs ExpenseLogicGenuity vs LINQ QonnectGenuity vs TemforceGenuity vs LightyearGenuity vs SakonExpenseLogic vs LINQ QonnectExpenseLogic vs TemforceExpenseLogic vs LightyearExpenseLogic vs SakonLINQ Qonnect vs TemforceLINQ Qonnect vs LightyearLINQ Qonnect vs SakonTemforce vs LightyearTemforce vs SakonLightyear vs Sakon
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203E04
L05
0607080910M11
M12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01vCom Solutions18%
vCom Solutions18%02Brightfin14%
Brightfin14%03Genuity14%
Genuity14%04ExpenseLogic7%
05LINQ Qonnect4%
06Temforce4%
Temforce4%07Lightyear2%
Lightyear2%08Sakon2%
Sakon2%09Calero2%
Calero2%10Tangoe One Telecom2%
Tangoe One Telecom2%11Mobil0%
12Motus0%
What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tangoe One Telecom46%
17 of 37 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“I'd specifically avoid or heavily vet Tangoe given the combination of SEC fraud charges, a real data breach with personal data exposure” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Calero39%
11 of 28 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Platforms with Explicit Cons in Reviews (e.g., Calero): High overall ratings ... but recurring complaints include delays in data reporting, slow changes to configurations” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Sakon23%
5 of 22 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Another platform with a high negative rating (80%), Sakon is criticized for similar reasons, including outdated systems and poor user experiences.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Cimpl
50%
4 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“niche ones like Billingbooth, Cimpl/Upland Cimpl, Softeligent): These often have zero or very few verified reviews.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 921 links across 160 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 39 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · GetApp44 answers · 63 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra42 answers · 68 citations · 11 models
35 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G229 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mindglobal21 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sourceforge19 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra19 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra16 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Tellennium14 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Socium IT13 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 9 models
34 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 3 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vCom Solutions vcomsolutions.com | 18% | 30 | 260 | 4 | 263 | ||
| Brightfin brightfin.com | 14% | 109 | 720 | 1 | 138 | 8 | |
| Genuity gogenuity.com | 14% | 52 | 4,400 | 189 | 1,691 | 0 | |
| ExpenseLogic | 7% | 10 | 0 | ||||
| LINQ Qonnect | 4% | ||||||
| Temforce temforce.com | 4% | 26 | 20 | 0 | 92 | ||
| Mindglobal mindglobal.com | 4% | 24 | 210 | 2 | 167 | 9 | |
| OneBill onebillsoftware.com | 4% | 17 | |||||
| Lightyear lightyear.ai | 2% | 64 | 33,100 | 17,745 | 33,552 | 22 | 4 |
| Sakon sakon.com | 2% | 85 | 1,000 | 196 | 583 | 2 | 3 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, mindglobal.com, tellennium.com, uplandsoftware.com). The first result for “best telecom expense management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which wireless and telecom bill management service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top telecom expense management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a telecom expense management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which telecom expense management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5MindglobalvCom SolutionsChangedTangoe One TelecomGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Five alternatives
Calero, ClearSight, Lightyear, Sakon, vCom SolutionsTwo alternatives
ClearSight, LightyearFive alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Cass Information Systems, Lightyear, SakonOne alternative
LightyearGPT-5.4 miniValicom Clearview, vCom SolutionsSakon Telecom Expense ManagementChangedno first choicevManageragainst: Motusno first choiceagainst: Motus MMS
Three alternatives
Brightfin, Sakon TEM, Tangoe One TelecomTwo alternatives
LINQ Qonnect, Valicom ClearviewFive alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Lightyear, Tangoe One Telecom, TellenniumOne alternative
SpikeFli AnalyticsGemini 3.5 FlashvCom SolutionsvCom SolutionsHeldCalero, Tangoe One TelecomBluewave, SpyGlassagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomBrightfin, Calero, Sakon, vCom Solutionsagainst: Brightfin, Calero, Expensify, Ramp, Tangoe One Telecom
Four alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Mindglobal, SakonFour alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Lightyear, MindglobalFive alternatives
Brightfin, Cass Information Systems, Sakon, TailWind, vCom SolutionsEight alternatives
Brightfin, Expensify, Lightyear, MobilSense / Sakon Mobile, Ramp, Valicom, Zoho Expense, vCom SolutionsPerplexity SonarvCom Solutionsagainst: BrightfinComviewChangedTangoe One Telecomagainst: MotusLightyearagainst: Calero, Cimpl, Tangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Brightfin, Calero-MDSL, Cimpl, Genuity, Tangoe One Telecom
Two alternatives
Lightyear, Upland CimplThree alternatives
Clearview, ExpenseLogic, LINQ QonnectSeven alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Lightyear, Sakon, Tellennium, Upland Cimpl, vCom SolutionsThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Genuity, MicrocallGrok 4.20Brightfinagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomBrightfin, LINQ QonnectChangedagainst: Mobil, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomTangoe One Telecomagainst: Navan, Paycom, SAP ConcurGenuityagainst: Zoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: Auditel Inc., Billingbooth, Calero, Cimpl, Softeligent, Upland Cimpl, WinBill, Wireless Watchdogs
Four alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Genuity, Mobil, zLinqOne alternative
ExpenseLogicSix alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Cimpl, ExpenseLogic, Mindglobal, SakonFour alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, LINQ Qonnect, MobilFour alternatives
Calero-MDSL, Cass Information Systems, Tangoe One Telecom, TemforceMistral SmallBrightfin, ExpenseLogicExpenseLogic, OneBillChangedExpenseLogic, vManagerGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
One alternative
MotusTwo alternatives
LINQ Qonnect, MotusSix alternatives
Brightfin, Cimpl, Lightyear, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, WidePointDeepSeek V4 FlashExpenseLogicagainst: Tangoe One TelecomGenuityChangedagainst: Tangoe One TelecomTangoe One TelecomGenuityagainst: Brightfin, Datagateno first choiceagainst: Asentinel, CMP, MOBI, Tangoe One Telecom
Two alternatives
Brightfin, TemforceFour alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, ExpenseLogic, SakonSix alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Sakon, Upland Software, Valicom, vManagerTwo alternatives
ExpenseLogic, MicrocallLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldAsignetno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashBrightfin, Tangoe One TelecomBrightfinChangedMobil(X) SuiteFibi, Telanalysisagainst: Tangoe One TelecomPogo Telecom, Temario, Xplore, iTECagainst: TMM, Verint, Zingermanagainst: IBM, Rev.io, Tangoe One Telecom, Temenos
Two alternatives
ExpenseLogic, MobilThree alternatives
Mindglobal, Mobil, Tangoe One TelecomFour alternatives
Brightfin, Datagate Telecom Billing, LINQ Qonnect, TemforceThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Genuity IT Admin Suite, MicrocallKimi K2vCom Solutionsagainst: CalerozLinqChangedagainst: Tangoe One Telecomno first choiceTemforceno first choiceagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, Tangoe One TelecomTwo alternatives
Brightfin, GenuityThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, SpikeFli Analytics, TelecomBilling.NetGLM 4.7 FlashXExpenseLogic, OneBillBrightfinChangedBrightfinGenuityno first choiceagainst: Tangoe TEM
Three alternatives
Brightfin, Motus, TemforceTwo alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Tangoe TEMFour alternatives
Calero, ExpenseLogic, Motus, Tangoe One TelecomFour alternatives
Microcall, Mobil, SRS Telecom Smart Billing, Zoho ExpenseMiniMax M2.5BrightfinvCom SolutionsChangedCimplTemforceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ExpenseLogic, vManagerThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, LINQ Qonnect, MotusNine alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, LINQ Qonnect, Mobil, Motus, Sakon, SpikeFli Analytics, Tangoe One Telecom, vManagerThree alternatives
Datagate, Mobil, Sierra GoldGPT-6 LunaClearviewvCom SolutionsChangedno first choiceagainst: Valicom ClearviewGenuityagainst: vCom Solutionsno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Two alternatives
Upland Cimpl, vCom SolutionsThree alternatives
Brightfin, GoExceed, TellenniumMuse Glimmer 30BMindglobal, vCom SolutionsLINQ Qonnect, vCom Solutions vManagerChangedTangoe One Telecom, Tangoe TEMGenuityagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecomno first choiceagainst: Billingbooth, Calero Telecom Expense Management, Cimpl, Datagate, Sakon TEM, Tangoe TEM
Four alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, ExpenseLogic, ValicomTwo alternatives
Mobil, WidePointFive alternatives
Brightfin, Clearview, ExpenseLogic, Sakon, Upland CimplTwo alternatives
Mobil, TemforceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 12 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 18 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 14 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 88 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 7 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 22 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 9 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 22 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 9 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 17 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 24 | 85 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 6 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 21 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 13 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 24 | 134 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:00 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:02 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 9 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:21 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 24 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 19 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 23 | 86 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Lightyear.ai read as Lightyear
Tangoe read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (Tangoe One) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One (Entry-Level) read as Tangoe One Telecom
vCom read as vCom Solutions
vCom (vManager) read as vCom Solutions
Unresolved, counted raw
Auditel Inc.
Bluewave
CMP
CSG
Calero Telecom Expense Management
Datagate Telecom Billing
Eracent
Fibi (Fibi B2B)
Holafly
Matrix Telecom
MobilSense / Sakon Mobile
Pogo Telecom
SRS Telecom Smart Billing
Sakon Telecom Expense Management (TEM)
Softeligent
Sprint (now T-Mobile) TEM
SpyGlass
TMM
Telanalysis
TelecomBilling.Net
Temario
Temis TEM
Upland Software (Cimpl)
Valor
Valyant
Verint
Wavenet
Xplore
Zingerman
iTEC
vCom Solutions vManager
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.