Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Expense management › Small business · September 2026 Edition
Expense management for small business buyers
Asked as “expense management software”, and as “employee expense reporting tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
36%
Contested · Ramp 23%
36Zoho Expense23Ramp19Expensify21others
36% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Ramp vs BILL Spend & ExpenseRamp vs ExpensifyRamp vs NavanRamp vs SAP ConcurZoho Expense vs SpendeskZoho Expense vs Rippling SpendZoho Expense vs BILL Spend & ExpenseZoho Expense vs ExpensifyZoho Expense vs NavanZoho Expense vs SAP ConcurSpendesk vs Rippling SpendSpendesk vs BILL Spend & ExpenseSpendesk vs ExpensifySpendesk vs NavanSpendesk vs SAP ConcurRippling Spend vs BILL Spend & ExpenseRippling Spend vs ExpensifyRippling Spend vs NavanRippling Spend vs SAP ConcurBILL Spend & Expense vs ExpensifyBILL Spend & Expense vs NavanBILL Spend & Expense vs SAP ConcurExpensify vs NavanExpensify vs SAP ConcurNavan vs SAP Concur
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Zoho Expense36%
Zoho Expense36%02Ramp23%
Ramp23%03Expensify19%
Expensify19%04BILL Spend & Expense13%
BILL Spend & Expense13%05Brex6%
Brex6%06Wave2%
Wave2%07SAP Concur0%
SAP Concur0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BILL Spend & Expense15%
8 of 53 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Specific Tools with Significant Complaints ... Poor customer service and protection issues - Hidden fees and unexpected billing” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Expensify13%
7 of 55 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Reddit threads call it a "regrettable choice" with integration failures” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
SAP Concur90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“The following types of expense management tools and platforms should be avoided or approached with extreme caution: ### 1. Legacy Enterprise-Grade Platforms (e.g., SAP Concur, Emburse)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Brex7%
2 of 28 labels negative · 2 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Brex - Common complaints include: Approval issues and spending limit problems - Ineffective receipt scanning” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 913 links across 171 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · G238 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
35 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Airwallex34 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OFX33 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · BILL32 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ramp30 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Mercury21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Rippling17 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 11 models
34 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best expense management software”, “expense management software”, “expense management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoho parent site Zoho Expense 36% | 36% | 194 | 5,400 | 52 | ||||
| Ramp ramp.com | 23% | 916 | 246,000 | 49,733 | 770,056 | $13,511 | 120 | 3 |
| Expensify expensify.com | 19% | 246 | 74,000 | 932 | 76,291 | 0 | 1 | |
| BILL bill.com BILL Spend & Expense 13% | 13% | 331 | 2,740,000 | 1,063,001 | 1,783,039 company | $199,231 | 119 | |
| Brex brex.com | 6% | 524 | 60,500 | 1,190 | 328,914 | $12,238 | 81 | 3 |
| Wave waveapps.com | 2% | 363 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | ||
| Rippling rippling.com Rippling Spend 0% | 0% | 124 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 company | $42,013 | 115 | |
| Airwallex airwallex.com | 0% | 260 | 27,100 | 416 | 420,414 | $56,832 | 45 | |
| Mercury mercury.com | 0% | 182 | 368,000 | 130,988 | 301,244 | $284,811 | 25 | 5 |
| Navan navan.com | 0% | 329 | 110,000 | 1,342 | 175,958 | $2,716 | 120 | 8 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, mercury.com, ramp.com). The first result for “best expense management software” is expensify.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best expense management software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee expense reporting tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top expense management tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best expense management software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an expense management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which expense management tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BILL Spend & Expense, Zoho ExpenseZoho ExpenseChangedMercuryZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense
Four alternatives
Expense 365, Expensify, Navan, Rippling SpendThree alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, RampSix alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Navan, Ramp, Sage Expense Management, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, NavanGPT-5.4 miniRampExpensifyChangedExpensifyagainst: QuickBooks Online ExpensesZoho Expenseagainst: BILL Spend & Expenseno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Xero, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
Brex, Ramp, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
Expensify, RampGemini 3.5 FlashRampExpensifyChangedRampBILL Spend & ExpenseBrex, Rampagainst: SAP Concuragainst: Coupa Expense Management, Emburse, Expensify, SAP Concur, Tipalti
Four alternatives
Airwallex, BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Harvest, Ramp, Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Sage Expense Management, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
Ramp, Wave, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
Fyle, Rippling Spend, Zoho ExpensePerplexity SonarRampagainst: SAP ConcurZoho ExpenseChangedZoho Expenseagainst: FreshBooks, WaveZoho Expenseagainst: Expensify, Rampno first choiceagainst: SAP Concur
Three alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, ExpensifyThree alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, RampOne alternative
BILL Spend & ExpenseGrok 4.20Rampagainst: QuickBooks Online ExpensesExpensifyChangedagainst: QuickBooks Online ExpensesZoho ExpenseZoho Expenseagainst: BILL Spend & Expenseno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Emburse, Expensify, SAP Concur, Sage Expense Management
Two alternatives
Expensify, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, QuickBooks Online Expenses, RampThree alternatives
Expensify, Ramp, WaveFive alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Ramp, Zoho ExpenseMistral SmallExpensify, Zoho ExpenseExpensify, Zoho ExpenseHeldExpensifyZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense
One alternative
RampOne alternative
Rippling SpendFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Pleo, Spendesk, XeroTwo alternatives
Brex, RampDeepSeek V4 FlashRampBILL Spend & ExpenseChangedRampZoho ExpenseBILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Rampagainst: Expensify, SAP Concur
Four alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
Expensify, Ramp, Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
Ramp, WaveThree alternatives
Expensify, Payhawk, Zoho ExpenseLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: Expensify
Three alternatives
FreshBooks, Wave, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, XeroQwen 3.7 FlashRampBILL Spend & ExpenseChangedBILL Spend & Expense, RampZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: CardScan, Expensifyagainst: Excel, Google Sheets, SAP Concur
Three alternatives
Airwallex, Expensify, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
Expensify, SpendeskThree alternatives
Expensify, Rippling Spend, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, ExpensifyKimi K2RampRampHeldRampZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify
Three alternatives
Brex, Expensify, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, ExpensifyFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, SpendeskThree alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp, WaveOne alternative
PayhawkGLM 4.7 FlashXExpensify, RampBILL Spend & ExpenseChangedRampExpensify, Zoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp, Relay
Three alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
Expensify, Ramp, Zoho ExpenseSeven alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Navan, Rippling Spend, Wave, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, RampMiniMax M2.5Zoho ExpenseBrex, ExpensifyChangedRampWave, Zoho ExpenseExpensifyagainst: SAP Concuragainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, SAP Concur, Xero
Four alternatives
Brex, Expensify, Ramp, Rippling SpendOne alternative
Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
Airwallex, RampTwo alternatives
Brex, RhoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 6 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:42 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:39 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:46 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:45 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 37 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:40 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 17 | 54 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 25 | 16 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:31 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 19 | 236 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:41 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:45 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:42 | yes | 35 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 25 | 71 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:32 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:27 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 11 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:49 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:31 | yes | 8 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:33 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 10 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 15 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:53 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 41 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:41 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:46 | yes | 14 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com (formerly Bill) read as BILL Spend & Expense
Certify read as Emburse
Coupa read as Coupa Expense Management
Divvy read as BILL Spend & Expense
Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River Expense) read as Emburse
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Expenses read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Online read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Online expense features read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
Rippling read as Rippling Spend
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Xero Expenses read as Xero
Unresolved, counted raw
CardScan
Everlance
Expense 365
ExpenseIn
Sapling
Stride
Zaggee
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.