Expense management
Asked as “expense management software”, and as “employee expense reporting tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
34%
Contested · Zoho Expense 17%
34Ramp17Zoho Expense11Spendesk38others
34% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Ramp vs BILL Spend & ExpenseRamp vs ExpensifyRamp vs NavanRamp vs SAP ConcurZoho Expense vs SpendeskZoho Expense vs Rippling SpendZoho Expense vs BILL Spend & ExpenseZoho Expense vs ExpensifyZoho Expense vs NavanZoho Expense vs SAP ConcurSpendesk vs Rippling SpendSpendesk vs BILL Spend & ExpenseSpendesk vs ExpensifySpendesk vs NavanSpendesk vs SAP ConcurRippling Spend vs BILL Spend & ExpenseRippling Spend vs ExpensifyRippling Spend vs NavanRippling Spend vs SAP ConcurBILL Spend & Expense vs ExpensifyBILL Spend & Expense vs NavanBILL Spend & Expense vs SAP ConcurExpensify vs NavanExpensify vs SAP ConcurNavan vs SAP Concur
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Ramp34%
Ramp34%02Zoho Expense17%
Zoho Expense17%03Spendesk11%
Spendesk11%04Rippling Spend9%
Rippling Spend9%05BILL Spend & Expense9%
BILL Spend & Expense9%06Expensify4%
Expensify4%07Navan4%
Navan4%08SAP Concur2%
SAP Concur2%09Airbase2%
Airbase2%10Brex0%
Brex0%11Emburse0%
Emburse0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Concur32%
13 of 40 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“The most frequently criticized option among users, with consistent themes across G2 and Trustpilot” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Expensify16%
8 of 50 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“A mixed picture — it rates well overall (4.5/5 on G2), but has had a notable drop in sentiment since the "New Expensify" redesign” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
BILL Spend & Expense14%
4 of 28 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“75+ reviews cite integration issues; 50+ mention fraud concerns” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Emburse19%
3 of 16 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Customer service is the dominant complaint — "the absolute worst," email-only” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 824 links across 194 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
44 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G243 answers · 58 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OFX28 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Airwallex23 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ramp18 answers · 36 citations · 9 models
vendor site · BILL18 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Spendesk13 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Capterra12 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
44 answers · 12 models
32 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best expense management software”, “expense management software”, “expense management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramp ramp.com | 34% | 916 | 246,000 | 49,733 | 770,056 | $13,511 | 120 | 3 |
| Zoho parent site Zoho Expense 17% | 17% | 194 | 5,400 | 52 | ||||
| Spendesk spendesk.com | 11% | 98 | 1,000 | 22 | 24,610 | 6 | ||
| Rippling rippling.com Rippling Spend 9% | 9% | 124 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 company | $42,013 | 115 | |
| BILL bill.com BILL Spend & Expense 9% | 9% | 331 | 2,740,000 | 1,063,001 | 1,783,039 company | $199,231 | 119 | |
| Expensify expensify.com | 4% | 246 | 74,000 | 932 | 76,291 | 0 | 1 | |
| Navan navan.com | 4% | 329 | 110,000 | 1,342 | 175,958 | $2,716 | 120 | 8 |
| Wave waveapps.com | 4% | 363 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | ||
| SAP Concur sap.com | 2% | 414 | 74,000 | 502 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 | |
| Airbase airbase.com | 2% | 142 | 14,800 | 577 | 5,429 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, ramp.com, spendesk.com). The first result for “best expense management software” is expensify.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best expense management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee expense reporting tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top expense management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best expense management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an expense management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which expense management tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5NavanRampChangedno first choiceBILL Spend & Expense, Waveno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Ramp
Two alternatives
Ramp, SAP ConcurTwo alternatives
Emburse, Zoho ExpenseOne alternative
Zoho ExpenseGPT-5.4 miniRippling SpendRampChangedRampZoho Expenseagainst: QuickBooks Online Expensesno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Navan, SAP ConcurTwo alternatives
Expensify, SAP ConcurFour alternatives
Airbase, Brex, Expensify, SAP ConcurOne alternative
ExpensifyGemini 3.5 FlashRampRampHeldRampRampagainst: Expensify, SAP Concurno first choiceagainst: SAP Concuragainst: Brex, Expensify, Manual Spreadsheets, SAP Concur
Four alternatives
Airbase, Brex, Navan, Rippling SpendThree alternatives
Airbase, Brex, NavanFive alternatives
Brex, Navan, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, SpendeskTwo alternatives
Wave, Zoho ExpensePerplexity SonarRampagainst: BrexBILL Spend & ExpenseChangedno first choiceZoho Expenseno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Airbase, Expensify, Navan, SAP Concur, SpendeskFour alternatives
Airbase, Expensify, Rippling Spend, SAP ConcurTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, ExpensifyGrok 4.20RampRampHeldRampZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Mobills, SAP Concur
Two alternatives
Navan, SAP ConcurFour alternatives
Expensify, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, Zoho ExpenseFive alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, RampMistral SmallSpendeskExpensify, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, SpendeskChangedZoho ExpenseZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: Brex, Dext, Expensify, Ramp, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Three alternatives
Emburse, Procurify, RampTwo alternatives
Payhawk, PleoNine alternatives
Airbase, Brex, Expensify, FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online Expenses, Ramp, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, RampDeepSeek V4 FlashRampRampHeldagainst: SAP ConcurRampZoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: SAP Concuragainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Emburse, Expensify, SAP Concur, Sage Expense Management
Four alternatives
Airwallex, Brex, Navan, SAP ConcurFour alternatives
Expensify, Navan, Rippling Spend, Zoho ExpenseSix alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Expensify, Navan, SAP Concur, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
Expensify, RampLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceSpendeskChangedno first choiceBILL Spend & Expense, Ramp, Zoho Expenseno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Emburse, Expensify, PaylocityQwen 3.7 FlashRampPleoChangedno first choiceZoho Expenseagainst: SAP, SAP Concurno first choiceagainst: Expensify, SAP Concur
Three alternatives
Navan, SAP Concur, SpendeskTwo alternatives
Expensify, SpendeskSix alternatives
Brex, Emburse, Expensify, Ramp, SAP Concur, Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
Expensify, Fyle, Ramp, WaveKimi K2Navan, Rampagainst: SAP ConcurRamp, SpendeskChangedRampBILL Spend & ExpenseAirbase, Rampagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Emburse, Expensify, SAP Concur, Sage Expense Management
Two alternatives
Expensify, Rippling SpendThree alternatives
Emburse, Navan, Rippling SpendEight alternatives
AppZen, BILL Spend & Expense, Coupa Expense Management, Expensify, Fyle, Navan, SAP Concur, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
ExpensePoint, Zoho ExpenseOne alternative
NavanGLM 4.7 FlashXRampRippling SpendChangedagainst: SAP ConcurNavan, SAP ConcurWaveno first choiceagainst: Emburse, Expensify, Ramp
Four alternatives
Expensify, Navan, Paylocity, SAP ConcurFive alternatives
Airwallex, Expensify, Navan, Ramp, RydooSix alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Ramp, Rippling Spend, Xero, Zoho ExpenseTwo alternatives
Flowlu, Zoho ExpenseMiniMax M2.5Rippling SpendExpensify, SpendeskChangedno first choiceAirwallex, Zoho Expenseno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Airbase, Emburse, Navan, SAP ConcurTwo alternatives
Navan, PleoThree alternatives
ExpensePoint, Expensify, RampBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:45 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:39 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:31 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:34 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 31 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 6 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 28 | 112 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:40 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 24 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 17 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 6 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:39 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 14 | 78 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 27 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:32 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:43 | yes | 10 | 54 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:28 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:36 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:45 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:41 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:34 | yes | 22 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:30 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:48 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:40 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:39 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 11 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:46 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:33 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:44 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:41 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 8 | 93 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:40 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 17:30 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 17:35 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 17:37 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 41 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:27 | yes | 29 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 17:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 17:44 | yes | 18 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 17:46 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 17:38 | yes | 24 | 102 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:47 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL read as BILL Spend & Expense
Bill.com read as BILL Spend & Expense
Certify read as Emburse
Coupa read as Coupa Expense Management
Divvy read as BILL Spend & Expense
Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River) read as Emburse
Emburse Expense Professional (formerly Certify) read as Emburse
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Online read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
Rippling read as Rippling Spend
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Unresolved, counted raw
Mobills
Oracle NetSuite Expenses
Trigo
UiPath Assist
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.