Procure-to-pay for small business buyers
Asked as “procure-to-pay platform”, and as “purchasing software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Precoro 24%
27Ramp24Precoro16Procurify33others
27% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Procurify vs ProcureDeskProcurify vs TipaltiProcurify vs StampliProcurify vs CoupaRamp vs PrecoroRamp vs TradogramRamp vs ProcureDeskRamp vs TipaltiRamp vs StampliRamp vs CoupaPrecoro vs TradogramPrecoro vs ProcureDeskPrecoro vs TipaltiPrecoro vs StampliPrecoro vs CoupaTradogram vs ProcureDeskTradogram vs TipaltiTradogram vs StampliTradogram vs CoupaProcureDesk vs TipaltiProcureDesk vs StampliProcureDesk vs CoupaTipalti vs StampliTipalti vs CoupaStampli vs Coupa
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Ramp27%
Ramp27%02Precoro24%
Precoro24%03Procurify16%
Procurify16%04Tradogram10%
Tradogram10%05BILL6%
BILL6%06Teampay2%
Teampay2%07Spendwise0%
Spendwise0%08SAP Ariba0%
SAP Ariba0%09Coupa0%
Coupa0%What they warned about
Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Coupa83%
25 of 30 labels negative · 12 of 12 models · 12 hard negative
“Described as having a steep learning curve, overwhelming complexity, poor documentation, and inflexible workflows... "expensive and complex for smaller teams."” Kimi K2, negative prompt
SAP Ariba88%
22 of 25 labels negative · 12 of 12 models · 12 hard negative
“small businesses should be cautious about or avoid the following types of procurement platforms: High-Cost, Enterprise-Level Platforms: Solutions like SAP Ariba and Coupa” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Procurify17%
8 of 47 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid platforms like Procurify, Precoro, or Jaggaer.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Alibaba100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 12 models
“businesses are actively looking for alternatives due to common complaints including supplier quality fluctuations, opaque pricing, language barriers, and fraud risks” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
63 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 880 links across 203 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Tradogram40 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Spendflo34 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G232 answers · 58 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G232 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ramp29 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ProcureDesk28 answers · 48 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Procurify17 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · AuraVMS16 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Precoro15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · VNDLY15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best procure-to-pay platform”, “procure-to-pay platform”, “procurement platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramp ramp.com | 27% | 916 | 246,000 | 49,733 | 770,056 | $13,511 | 120 | |
| Precoro precoro.com | 24% | 341 | 1,000 | 3 | 82,966 | 86 | ||
| Procurify procurify.com | 16% | 278 | 4,400 | 43 | 62,225 | $282 | 14 | |
| Tradogram tradogram.com | 10% | 124 | 880 | 4 | 208,129 | 1 | ||
| BILL bill.com | 6% | 374 | 2,740,000 | 1,063,001 | 1,783,039 | $199,231 | 119 | |
| Cflow cflowapps.com | 4% | 17 | ||||||
| ProcureDesk procuredesk.com | 2% | 29 | 720 | 1 | 11,677 | 5 | 5 | |
| Teampay paystand.com | 2% | 11 | 590 | 11 | 59,075 | $55,504 | 51 | |
| Zoho parent site Zoho Inventory 2% | 2% | 8 | 6,600 | 330 | ||||
| Odoo odoo.com | 2% | 122 | 49,500 | 3,053 | 406,262 | $644 | 95 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, learn.g2.com, procuredesk.com). The first result for “best procure-to-pay platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best procure-to-pay platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which purchasing software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top procurement platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best procure-to-pay platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a procure-to-pay platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which procurement platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BILLPrecoroChangedPrecoroagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaCflowno first choiceagainst: 1688.com, Alibaba, SAP
Three alternatives
Cflow, Precoro, ProcurifyTwo alternatives
Amazon Business, SpendwiseFour alternatives
Ramp, Spendflo, Spendwise, TradogramThree alternatives
BILL, Precoro, TradogramGPT-5.4 miniProcurifyagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaPrecoroChangedPrecoro, ProcurifyPrecoroagainst: Coupa, Procurifyno first choicenothing named
One alternative
PrecoroThree alternatives
ProcureDesk, ProcurementExpress.com, SpendwiseThree alternatives
Order.co, Teampay, ZipTwo alternatives
Kissflow Procurement, Zoho InventoryGemini 3.5 FlashPrecoroagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaTradogramChangedPrecoroagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaRamp, Tradogramagainst: Coupa, Procurify, SAP Aribano first choiceagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribaagainst: Coupa, GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Ariba
Four alternatives
ProcureDesk, Procurify, Ramp, TradogramTwo alternatives
Precoro, SpendwiseFive alternatives
ControlHub, Order.co, ProcurementExpress.com, Procurify, TradogramThree alternatives
Airtable, Precoro, SoftrPerplexity SonarProcurifyPrecoroChangedPrecoro, ProcurifyPrecoroagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer, SAP Aribano first choiceagainst: Coupa, GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Order.co, Payhawk, Procurify, Ramp, Rippling Spend, SAP Ariba, Zycus
Four alternatives
BILL, Ramp, Spendwise, TradogramTwo alternatives
Procurify, XeroThree alternatives
Ramp, Spendwise, TradogramTwo alternatives
BILL, RampGrok 4.20PrecoroRamp, TradogramChangedPrecoro, Procurifyagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaRampPrecoro, Procurify, Ramp, Stampliagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribaagainst: Alibaba, Coupa, Global Sources, IndiaMART, SAP Ariba
Four alternatives
Cflow, Procurify, Ramp, SpendwiseThree alternatives
Precoro, ProcureDesk, ProcurifyThree alternatives
ProcurementExpress.com, Ramp, SpendwiseThree alternatives
ProcurementExpress.com, Spendwise, TradogramMistral SmallCflow, PrecoroZoho PurchasesChangedagainst: CoupaPrecoroOdoo, Zoho Inventoryno first choiceagainst: Coupa, Kissflow Procurement, Precoro, SAP Ariba
Two alternatives
Ramp, TeampayThree alternatives
ProcurementFlow, QuickBooks Commerce, SpendwiseFour alternatives
Procurify, Ramp, Spendwise, TradogramThree alternatives
Ramp, Spendwise, TradogramSix alternatives
Airbase, BILL, Divvy, Melio, MineralTree, RampDeepSeek V4 FlashRampTradogramChangedagainst: QuickBooks OnlinePrecoroagainst: Coupa, Kissflow Procurement, SAP AribaRampagainst: Coupa, Kissflow Procurement, Precoro, ProcurifyPrecoro, Procurifyagainst: Alibaba, Coupa, Global Sources, SAP Ariba
Four alternatives
Precoro, Procurify, Teampay, TradogramFour alternatives
Precoro, Procurify, Xero, Zoho Books / Zoho InventoryFour alternatives
Procurify, Ramp, Spendwise, TradogramOne alternative
TradogramTwo alternatives
BILL, Rippling SpendLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceProcurifyChangedno first choiceRampno first choiceagainst: Coupa, Procurify, SAP Ariba
Three alternatives
Order.co, Tipalti, TradogramTwo alternatives
Precoro, TeampayQwen 3.7 FlashBILLagainst: CoupaCin7 CoreChangedagainst: UnleashedProcurify, Rampagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaRampBILLagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAPagainst: Alibaba, Amazon Business, Costco Corporate, DHgate, Fiverr Enterprise, Made-in-China, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Ariba, Upwork
Three alternatives
Procurify, Rippling Spend, Zoho InvoiceTwo alternatives
VNDLY, Zoho InventoryFour alternatives
Kissflow Procurement, Precoro, Tradogram, ZaproFour alternatives
Spendwise, Tradogram, Xero, Zoho BooksFour alternatives
AvidXchange, Procurify, Ramp, TipaltiKimi K2Precoro, Rampagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaProcurify, RampChangedPrecoro, TradogramRampagainst: ProcurifyPrecoro, Procurifyagainst: Coupa, SAP Ariba
Three alternatives
ProcureDesk, Procurify, TeampayTwo alternatives
Precoro, TradogramThree alternatives
ProcureDesk, Procurify, SpendwiseFive alternatives
BILL, Odoo, Spendwise, Tradogram, Zoho InventoryOne alternative
TradogramGLM 4.7 FlashXProcureDeskagainst: RampTradogramChangedagainst: ProcurementExpress.comno first choiceRampagainst: Jaggaer, Precoro, Procurifyno first choiceagainst: Amazon Business, Coupa, Jaggaer, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, Procurify, Ramp, SAP Ariba
Two alternatives
Procurify, TradogramFive alternatives
Cin7 Core, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Odoo, Pipefy, Zoho InventoryThree alternatives
Cflow, Spendwise, Zoho InventoryMiniMax M2.5Ramp, TeampayProcurifyChangedPrecoro, SpendwiseRampno first choiceagainst: Coupa, SAP Ariba, Workday P2P/T&E
Two alternatives
Precoro, StampliFour alternatives
Pipefy, ProcureDesk, Teampay, TradogramTwo alternatives
Ramp, TradogramFour alternatives
Pipefy, Tradogram, Xero, Zoho BooksBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:55 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:40 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:50 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:21 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:26 | yes | 30 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:38 | yes | 16 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:36 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:52 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:24 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:21 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:37 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:48 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:03 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:53 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:50 | yes | 28 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:30 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:03 | yes | 17 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:10 | yes | 9 | 61 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:04 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:02 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:26 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:55 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:18 | yes | 18 | 54 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:20 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:14 | yes | 23 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:45 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:26 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 19:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:24 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:31 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:07 | yes | 9 | 127 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:11 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:39 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:17 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:58 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:08 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:35 | yes | 39 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:51 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:49 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:03 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:10 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:28 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:42 | yes | 30 | 201 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:09 | yes | 10 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:58 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:04 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:19 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:56 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:29 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:34 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 18 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:09 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:30 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:53 | yes | 14 | 100 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:40 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:22 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:00 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:19 | yes | 14 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:50 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:03 | yes | 41 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:47 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:15 | yes | 27 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:01 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:13 | no | 0 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:58 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:40 | yes | 30 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:46 | yes | 22 | 48 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ariba read as SAP Ariba
Bill.com read as BILL
Kissflow read as Kissflow Procurement
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Oracle Procurement read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Oracle Procurement Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Rippling read as Rippling Spend
Workday P2P (Procure-to-Pay) read as Workday P2P/T&E
Unresolved, counted raw
Costco Corporate
ProcurementFlow
Shopify B2B / Shopify Plus
SparkLayer
Updoot
Zoho Purchases
inFlow
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.