Virtual data rooms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “virtual data room”, and as “M&A due diligence data room”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
44%
Clear leader
44Datasite Diligence09Intralinks09SS&C Intralinks38others
44% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−2Since October 2026: 46% → 44%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Datasite Diligence held the lead, −2 points on 46%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Papermark Data Rooms17%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Papermark Data Rooms (17%) replaces Peony Data Room (29% then, 15% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
iDeals27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Datasite Diligence44%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 46% → 44%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
Papermark Data Rooms17%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Papermark Data Rooms (17%) replaces Peony Data Room (29% then, 15% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketiDeals27%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 25% → 27%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseDatasite Diligence44%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 46% → 44%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Datasite Diligence44%17%63endorsed leader▼−2Since October 2026: 46% → 44%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.46% → 44%
Datasite Diligence44%17%63endorsed leader▼−2Since October 2026: 46% → 44%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.46% → 44%02
Intralinks9%28%46criticized challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 18% → 9%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.18% → 9%
Intralinks9%28%46criticized challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 18% → 9%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.18% → 9%03SS&C Intralinks9%0%15accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%
04
SecureDocs9%6%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 11% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.11% → 9%
SecureDocs9%6%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 11% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.11% → 9%05iDeals5%0%35accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 5%
iDeals5%0%35accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 5%06
Ansarada5%5%41accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
Ansarada5%5%41accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%07
FirmRoom4%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
FirmRoom4%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%08
Firmex2%12%43accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
Firmex2%12%43accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%09
DealRoom2%16%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
DealRoom2%16%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Box0%60%15criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Box0%60%15criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10DFIN Venue0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
iDeals vs FirmRoomiDeals vs AnsaradaiDeals vs ShareVaultiDeals vs CapLinkedPapermark Data Rooms vs FirmexPapermark Data Rooms vs SecureDocsPapermark Data Rooms vs FirmRoomPapermark Data Rooms vs AnsaradaPapermark Data Rooms vs ShareVaultPapermark Data Rooms vs CapLinkedFirmex vs SecureDocsFirmex vs FirmRoomFirmex vs AnsaradaFirmex vs ShareVaultFirmex vs CapLinkedSecureDocs vs FirmRoomSecureDocs vs AnsaradaSecureDocs vs ShareVaultSecureDocs vs CapLinkedFirmRoom vs AnsaradaFirmRoom vs ShareVaultFirmRoom vs CapLinkedAnsarada vs ShareVaultAnsarada vs CapLinkedShareVault vs CapLinked
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102S03
040506070809D10
11Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Datasite Diligence44%
Datasite Diligence44%02Intralinks9%
Intralinks9%03SS&C Intralinks9%
04SecureDocs9%
SecureDocs9%05iDeals5%
iDeals5%06Ansarada5%
Ansarada5%07FirmRoom4%
FirmRoom4%08Firmex2%
Firmex2%09DealRoom2%
DealRoom2%10DFIN Venue0%
11Box0%
Box0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Intralinks28%
13 of 46 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“A reviewer gave 1/5 stars saying "Avoid Intralinks at all costs!" citing dated, complicated interface and ongoing bugs” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Datasite Diligence17%
11 of 63 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“it's recommended to avoid Datasite and per-user models like Box if cost predictability is the top priority” Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt
Box60%
9 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Standard corporate tiers of cloud storage (e.g., standard Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, or Microsoft SharePoint without specialized VDR add-ons)... they lack enterprise-grade M&A and due diligence capabilities.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Firmex12%
5 of 43 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Firmex, for example, says customers can choose document storage in the U.S., Canada, or Germany, while metadata and user information are stored in Canada.” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 944 links across 175 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Intralinks36 answers · 100 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Ideals VDR32 answers · 42 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Capterra27 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CapLinked26 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Datasite25 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Papermark22 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FirmRoom18 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · EthosData18 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Govern 36515 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Orangedox15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 4 models
11 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best virtual data room”, “virtual data room”, “virtual data rooms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datasite Diligence datasite.com | 44% | 147 | 70 | 1 | 21,733 | $10,771 | 63 | |
| Intralinks intralinks.com Intralinks 9%, Intralinks VDRPro 2% | 11% | 114 | 14,800 | 246 | 20,774 | 43 | 5 | |
| SS&C Intralinks | 9% | 26 | ||||||
| SecureDocs securedocs.com | 9% | 84 | 1,000 | 66 | 2,831 | 0 | ||
| iDeals idealsboard.com | 5% | 109 | 74,000 | 124,212 | 3,877 | $55 | 36 | |
| Ansarada ansarada.com | 5% | 90 | 1,300 | 20 | 20,444 | $732 | 25 | |
| FirmRoom firmroom.com | 4% | 60 | 320 | 3 | 6,534 | $78 | 2 | |
| Govern 365 govern365.com | 4% | 5 | ||||||
| Firmex firmex.com | 2% | 111 | 4,400 | 31 | 4,370 | 17 | ||
| DealRoom dealroom.net | 2% | 62 | 1,600 | 67 | 48,196 | 18 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, ethosdata.com, g2.com, idealsvdr.com, intralinks.com, orangedox.com). The first result for “best virtual data room” is visible.vc.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best virtual data room for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which M&A due diligence data room would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade virtual data rooms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best virtual data room for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a virtual data room. What should we look at?”Negative“Which virtual data rooms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Datasite DiligenceDatasite DiligenceHeldDatasite Diligence, IntralinksSecureDocsno first choiceagainst: Box, Intralinks
Three alternatives
Firmex, Ideals VDR, IntralinksTwo alternatives
Intralinks, iDealsThree alternatives
Box, Firmex, iDealsTwo alternatives
CapLinked, DealRoomGPT-5.4 miniDatasite Diligence, SS&C Intralinksagainst: CapLinkedDatasite DiligenceChangedDatasite DiligenceAnsaradaagainst: DealRoomno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Firmex, IntralinksFour alternatives
Ansarada, Firmex, SS&C Intralinks, iDealsOne alternative
Datasite DiligenceGemini 3.5 FlashDatasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksDatasite DiligenceChangedDatasite DiligenceFirmexDatasite Diligenceagainst: Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft SharePoint
Four alternatives
Ansarada, Box, Firmex, iDealsThree alternatives
DealRoom, SS&C Intralinks, iDeals Virtual Data RoomFive alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, Firmex, SS&C Intralinks, iDeals Virtual Data RoomFour alternatives
DealRoom, FirmRoom, Govern 365, iDealsFive alternatives
Ansarada, Box, Firmex, Intralinks, iDealsPerplexity SonarDatasite DiligenceDatasite DiligenceHeldDatasite Diligenceagainst: Box, CapLinkedGovern 365against: Datasite Diligence, Intralinksno first choiceagainst: Box, Google Drive
Three alternatives
DealRoom, Intralinks, iDealsThree alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, Intralinks VDRProSix alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, Doxis, Firmex, SS&C Intralinks, iDealsOne alternative
ShareVaultGrok 4.20Datasite Diligence, IntralinksDatasite DiligenceChangedagainst: Ansarada, DealRoom, FirmexDatasite Diligence, Intralinksagainst: DealRoom, FirmRoomiDealsno first choiceagainst: BlackBerry Workspaces, Box, Brainloop, CapLinked, Citrix ShareFile, Digify, DocSend, ForData, Google Workspace, HighQ, Intralinks, Onehub, SecureDocs, Sterling, Vitrium Security
Three alternatives
Ansarada, FirmRoom, iDealsTwo alternatives
Ideals VDR, SS&C IntralinksThree alternatives
Ansarada, DFIN Venue, iDeals Virtual Data RoomFour alternatives
Ansarada, Datasite Diligence, FirmRoom, IntralinksMistral SmallDatasite Diligence, iDealsDatasite DiligenceChangedno first choiceDealRoom, FirmRoomno first choiceagainst: Firmex VDR
Two alternatives
Firmex, IntralinksThree alternatives
DealRoom, Ideals VDR, IntralinksOne alternative
iDealsEight alternatives
Ansarada, Box, Firmex, Intralinks, Merrill Datasite, SecureDocs, ShareVault, iDealsDeepSeek V4 FlashSS&C IntralinksSS&C IntralinksHeldDatasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksPapermark Data Rooms, SecureDocsagainst: DFIN Venue, Datasite Diligence, Intralinksno first choiceagainst: Box, Dropbox, Firmex, Google Drive, Intralinks, OneDrive, ShareFile
Two alternatives
Datasite Diligence, iDealsOne alternative
Datasite DiligenceFour alternatives
Ansarada, DFIN Venue, Firmex, iDealsOne alternative
FirmRoomLlama 4 MaverickDatasite Diligence, Intralinks, iDealsno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Box, Datasite Diligenceno first choiceagainst: Box, Datasite Diligence, Dropbox, Intralinks
Three alternatives
Intralinks, Peony Data Room, SecureDocsQwen 3.7 FlashIntralinksDatasite Diligence, IntralinksChangedDatasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksAnsaradano first choiceagainst: Datasite Diligence, Intralinks, Merrill Datasite
Five alternatives
Ansarada, Datasite Diligence, Ideals VDR, SecureDocs, ShareFileOne alternative
AnsaradaThree alternatives
DealRoom, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data RoomsTwo alternatives
Firmex, SecureDocsKimi K2Datasite Diligence, Intralinks VDRProDatasite Diligence®ChangedDatasite Diligence, IntralinksGovern 365against: Datasite Diligence, Intralinksno first choiceagainst: Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive
One alternative
iDeals Virtual Data RoomTwo alternatives
Firmex, IntralinksThree alternatives
Ansarada, Firmex, iDealsTwo alternatives
Firmex, iDealsGLM 4.7 FlashXDatasite Diligence, IntralinksDatasite DiligenceChangedDatasite DiligenceCapLinkedno first choiceagainst: Datasite Diligence, Intralinks
Two alternatives
Ansarada, iDealsThree alternatives
DealRoom, Intralinks, iDealsFour alternatives
Ansarada, DealRoom, SS&C Intralinks, iDealsTwo alternatives
FirmRoom, eDataRoomsMiniMax M2.5Datasite Diligence, SS&C IntralinksDatasite DiligenceChangedno first choiceSecureDocsFirmRoomagainst: Datasite Diligence, Firmex, Intralinks
Three alternatives
Ansarada, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data RoomFive alternatives
Ansarada, Brainloop, Firmex, Intralinks, iDealsThree alternatives
Datasite Diligence, Intralinks, OrangedoxFour alternatives
Box, Datasite Diligence, Intralinks, iDealsGPT-6 LunaDatasite DiligenceDatasite DiligenceHeldDatasite Diligence, SS&C Intralinksagainst: AnsaradaSecureDocsagainst: Datasite Diligence, Intralinksno first choiceagainst: Box, DealRoom, Firmex, ShareFile
Three alternatives
Ansarada, Firmex, IntralinksTwo alternatives
Ansarada, SS&C Intralinks VDRProThree alternatives
DFIN Venue, Firmex, iDealsOne alternative
FirmexMuse Glimmer 30BDatasite DiligenceDatasite DiligenceHeldSS&C Intralinks DealCentre AIAnsarada, SecureDocsagainst: Datasite Diligence, Intralinksno first choiceagainst: Datasite Diligence, Firmex, Intralinks
Two alternatives
Intralinks, iDeals Virtual Data RoomOne alternative
SS&C IntralinksTwo alternatives
Datasite Diligence, iDeals Virtual Data RoomThree alternatives
CapLinked, Firmex, Papermark Data RoomsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 20 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 23 | 114 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 12 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 24 | 94 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:55 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 15 | 64 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 24 | 158 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 6 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 25 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 15 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 23 | 96 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 22 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:19 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:16 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 23 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:38 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:02 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 23 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
DFIN read as DFIN Venue
Datasite read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (Datasite Diligence) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (Diligence + Blueflame AI) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (EQ) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (Merrill Datasite) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (Merrill) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (by KKR) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (formerly Mergerware) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (formerly Merrill Datasite) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (formerly Merrill DatasiteOne) read as Datasite Diligence
Datasite (formerly Merrill) read as Datasite Diligence
Papermark read as Papermark Data Rooms
Peony read as Peony Data Room
Unresolved, counted raw
BlackBerry Workspaces
Datasite Diligence®
DealRoom.net
DocuVault
DocullyVDR
ForData
Intralinks DealCentre AI
Microsoft SharePoint
SS&C Intralinks DealCentre AI
SS&C Intralinks VDRPro
Sterling
Trumpet
Vitrium Security
eDataRooms
iDeals Virtual Data Rooms
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.