Index › IT › Products › ServiceNow Archer · November 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

ServiceNow Archer

servicenow.com ↗

–Too few to rank
1/14Models named it
0First choices
3Warnings
November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.
Ranked inCyber risk quantification #112 mid-marketThird-party risk management #93
What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. ServiceNow Archer has 2.

Why models recommend it

No positive label carried a quote.

What gives them pause

“you may not have a dedicated team of 10 people to manage a massive Enterprise GRC ... suite like IBM OpenPages or ServiceNow Archer”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scale-constrained question · warning
“These tools may lack the granular analytical rigor of RiskLens”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as ServiceNow Archer, over the 3 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

At a glance

Stated on ServiceNow Archer's own site, not checked by Gane.

Visit servicenow.com ↗

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

By model

How each model answered on ServiceNow Archer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionWarningLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00022
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000